Assessment of the mobile bag method for estimation of in vivo starch digestibility

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 265-271

  Ghoorchi, T ^a,b   Lund, P ^a   Larsen, M ^a   Hvelplund, T ^a   Hansen Moller J ^a   Weisbjerg, M R ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

cereals; in vivo; legumes; mobile bag; starch digestibility

Indexed keywords

STARCH;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAIRYING; DIGESTION; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FECES; FEMALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SMALL INTESTINE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DIGESTION; FECES; FEMALE; INTESTINE, SMALL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STARCH;

AVENA FATUA; HORDEUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84872073591     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001504     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A kerlind M, Weisbjerg MR, Eriksson T, Thøgersen R, Uden P, Olafsson BL, Harstad OM and Volden H 2011. Feed analysis and digestion methods. In Norfor - The Nordic feed evaluation system. EAAP publication (ed. Volden H) no. 130, pp. 41-54. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands
2. Bach Knudsen KE 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 319-338 (Pubitemid 127400664)
3. Crocker LM, DePeters EJ, Fadel JG, Perez-Monti H, Taylor SJ, Wyckoff JA and Zinn RA 1998. Influence of processed corn grain in diets of dairy cows on digestion of nutrients and milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2394-2407 (Pubitemid 128461047)
4. Focant M, Van Hoecke A and Vanbelle M 1990. The effect of two heat treatment (steam flaking and extrusion) on the digestion of Pisum sativum in the stomach of heifers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 28, 303-313
5. Gallant DJ, Bouchet B, Buleon A and Perez S 1992. Physical characteristics of starch granules and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46 (suppl. 2), S3-S16
6. Goelema JO, Smits A, Vaessen LM and Wemmers A 1999. Effects of pressure toasting, expander treatment and pelleting on in vitro and in situ parameters of protein and starch in a mixture of broken peas, lupins and faba beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology 78, 109-126 (Pubitemid 29167275)
7. Harmon DL, Yamka RM and Elam NA 2004. Factors affecting intestinal starch digestion in ruminants: A review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 309-318 (Pubitemid 39588053)
8. Holm J, Lundquist I, Bjöck I, Eliasson AC and Asp NG 1988. Relationship between degree of gelatinisation, digestion rate in vitro, and metabolic response in rats. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 1010-1016
9. Huhtanen P and Sveinbjörnsson P 2006. Evaluation of methods for estimating starch digestibility and digestion kinetics in ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 130, 95-113 (Pubitemid 44308689)
10. Huntington GB 1997. Starch utilization by ruminants: From basics to the bunk. Journal of Animal Science 75, 852-867 (Pubitemid 127446807)
11. Hvelplund T 1985. Digestibility of rumen microbial protein and undegraded dietary protein estimated in the small intestine of sheep or by in sacco procedure. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Supplementum 25, 132-144
12. Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg MR and Andersen LS 1992. Estimation of the true digestibility of rumen undegraded protein in the small intestine of ruminants by the mobile bag technique. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 42, 34-39
13. Jarosz L, Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg MR and Borg Jensen B 1994. True digestibility of protein in the small intestine and the hind gut of cows measured with the mobile bag technique using N-labelled roughage. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 44, 146-151
14. Larsen M, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR and Hvelplund T 2009. Digestion site of starch from cereals and legumes in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 153, 236-248
15. McNiven MA, Weisbjerg MR and Hvelplund T 1995. Influence of roasting or sodium hydroxide treatment of barley on digestion in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 1106-1115
16. Mills JAN, France J and Dijkstra J 1999. A review of starch digestion in the lactating dairy cow and proposals for a mechanistic model. 2. Postruminal starch digestion and small intestinal glucose absorption. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 8, 451-481
17. Nocek JE and Tamminga S 1991. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3598-3629
18. Norberg E, Volden H and Harstad OM 2007. Technical note: Assessment of recovery site of mobile nylon bags for measuring ileal digestibility of starch in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 418-421 (Pubitemid 350042872)
19. Offner A and Sauvant D 2004. Prediction of in vivo starch digestion in cattle from in situ data. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 41-56 (Pubitemid 38051430)
20. Owens FN, Zinn RA and Kim YK 1986. Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1634-1648
21. Prestløkken E and Rise O 2003. Protein and amino acid digestibility in dairy cows measured with mobile nylon bag recovered in ileum or faeces. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 53, 11-20 (Pubitemid 36590190)
22. SAS Institute 2005. Statistical Analysis System, version 9.1 (release TS1M3). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
23. Tothi R, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR and Hvelplund T 2003. Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evacuation and in situ techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology 104, 71-94 (Pubitemid 36280313)
24. Vanhatalo A and Ketoja E 1995. The role of the large intestine in post-ruminal digestion of feeds measured by the mobile-bag method in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 491-505
25. Varvikko T and Vanhatalo A 1990. The effect of differing types of cloth and of contamination by non-feed nitrogen on intestinal digestion estimates using porous synthetic-fibre bags in a cow. British Journal of Nutrition 63, 221-229 (Pubitemid 20134253)
26. Voight J, Piatkowski B, Engelmann H and Rudolph E 1985. Measurement of the postruminal digestibility of crude protein by the bag technique in cows. Archiv für Tiernährung 35, 555-562
27. Volden H (ed.) 2011. Norfor - The Nordic feed evaluation system. EAAP publication No. 130. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 180 pp.
28. Volden H and Harstad OM 1995. Effect of rumen incubation on the true indigestibility of feed protein in the digestive tract determined by nylon bag techniques. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 45, 106-115
29. WeisbjergMR,Hvelplund T, Hellberg S, Olsson S and Sanne S 1996. Effective rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of individual amino acids in different concentrate determined in situ. Animal Feed Science and Technology 62, 179-188 (Pubitemid 126366325)
30. Yu P, Goelema JO, Leury BJ, Tamminga S and Egan AR 2002. An analysis of the nutritive value of heat processed legume seeds for animal production using the DVE/OEB model: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 99, 141-176 (Pubitemid 34961429)