Effector independence

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 253-270

  Park, Jin Hoon ^a   Shea, Charles H ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Effector transfer; Generalized motor program; Parameter learning; Sequence learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036720343     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222890209601944     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon Press.
2. Castiello, U., Stelmach, G. E., & Lieberman, A. N. (1993). Temporal dissociation of the prehension pattern in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 31, 395-402.
3. Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Skill acquisition: An event approach with special reference to searching for the optimum of a function of several variables. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 1-40). New York: Academic Press.
4. Gelfand, I. M., & Tsetlin, M. (1971). Mathematical modeling of mechanisms of the central nervous system. In I. M. Gelfand, V. Gurfinkel, S. Fomin, & M. Tsetlin (Eds.), Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Henningsen, H., Ende-Henningsen, B., & Gordon, A. M. (1995). Asymmetric control of bilateral isometric finger forces. Experimental Brain Research, 105, 304-311.
6. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
7. Jordan, M. I. (1995). The organization of action sequences: Evidence from a relearning task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 179-192.
8. Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeanerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 77-110). Hillsdale; NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
10. Kelso, J. A. S. (1981). Contrasting perspectives on order and regulation in movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 437-457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Kelso, J. A. S., Putnam, C., & Goodman, D. (1983). On the spacetime structure of human inter-limb coordination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 347-375.
12. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
13. Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 13-35). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51-59.
15. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 79-83.
16. Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., & Little, M. (2000). Effects of modeled auditory information on a sequential timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 349-356.
17. Lai', Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 10-24.
18. Langley, D. J., & Zelaznik, H. N. (1984). The acquisition of time properties associated with a sequential motor skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 275-301.
19. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112-136). New York: Wiley.
20. Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Pizot, E. (1988). Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 24-37.
21. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problem of flexibility and fluency in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483-506.
22. Merton, P. A. (1972). How we control the contraction of our muscles. Scientific American, 226, 30-37.
23. Newell, K. M. (1981). Skill learning. In D. H. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 203-226). New York: Wiley.
24. Povel, D., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107-123.
25. Raibert, M. H. (1977). Motor control and learning in a state space model. (Tech. Rep. AI-M-351). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
26. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1990). On choosing between movement sequences: Comments on Rose (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 439-444.
27. Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munro, E. M. (1987). Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: Tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 193-203.
28. Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372-393.
29. Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86-102.
30. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Saltzman, E. (1984). A motor-program editor. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 51-61). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
31. Rosenbaum, D. A., Saltzman, E., & Kingman, A. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences. In S. Komblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 119-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
33. Schmidt, R. A. (1985). The search for invariance in skilled movement behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 188-200.
34. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
35. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
36. Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (1996). The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 59-68.
37. Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., Sidaway, B., & Anderson, D. I. (1994). The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized motor programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 330-338.
38. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice condition: Effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139-152.
39. Shea, C. H., & Park, J.-H. (2001). Segmental and sequential control of timing sequences: Performance and learning effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 27-36.
41. Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., Park, J.-H., & Gaunt, B. (2001). Effects of modeled auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 127-138.
42. Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 119-125.
43. Stadler, M. A. (1989). On the learning of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 1061-1069.
44. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., & Turock, D. L. (1990). Hierarchical control in the execution of action sequences: Tests of two invariance properties. In M. Jeanerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 3-55). Hillsdale; NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
46. Tangeman, P. T., Banaitis, D. A., & Williams, A. K. (1990). Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: Changes in functional performance. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 876-880.
47. Weiss, P., Stelmach, G. E., & Hefter, H. (1997). Programming of a movement sequence in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 120, 91-102.
48. Whitacre, C., & Shea, C. H. (2000). The performance and learning of generalized motor programs: Relative (GMP) and absolute (parameter) errors. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 163-175.
49. Winstein, C. J., Merians, A. S., & Sullivan, K. J. (1999). Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 37, 975-987.
50. Wright, C. E. (1990). Generalized motor programs: Reexamining claims of effector independence in writing. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 294-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 32-38.
52. Wulf, G. (1992). Reducing knowledge of results can produce context effects in movements of the same class. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 71-84.
53. Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.
54. Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
55. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameter learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.