The DSM revision as a social psychological process: A commentary on Blashfield and Reynolds

Journal of Personality Disorders

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 830-834

  Lilienfeld, Scott O ^a   Watts, Ashley L ^a   Smith, Sarah Francis ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; NOTE; PERSONALITY DISORDER; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; PERSONALITY DISORDERS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84871944465     PISSN: 0885579X     EISSN: 19432763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.6.830     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bartley, W. W. (1984). The retreat to commitment. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
2. Blashfield, R. K., & Reynolds, S. M. (2012). An invisible college view of the DSM-5 personality disorder classification. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(6), 821-829.
3. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the fivefactor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
4. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl R. Popper (pp. 412-463). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
5. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1969). Personality structure and measurement. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
6. Frances, A. J., & Widiger, T. (2012). Psychiatric diagnosis: Lessons from the DSM-IV past and cautions for the DSM-5 future. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 109-130.
7. Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issue from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291-315). New York: Springer.
8. Honderich, T. (Ed.). (1995). Genetic fallacy. In The Oxford companion to philosophy (pp. 331). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Kirk, S. A., & Kutchins, H. (1992). The selling of the DSM: The rhetoric of science in psychiatry. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
10. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
11. Lynn, S. J., Berg, J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., Accardi, M., et al. (2012). Dissociative disorders. In M. Hersen & D. C. Beidel (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (pp. 497-538). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
12. MacDougall, C., & Baum, F. (1997). The devil's advocate: A strategy to avoid groupthink and stimulate discussion in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 532-541.
13. Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55.
14. Maule, A. J., and Edland, A. C. (1997). The effect of time pressure on judgement and decision making. In R. Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 189-204). London: Routledge.
15. Maule, A. J., Hockey, G. R. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of time pressure on decisionmaking under uncertainty: Changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica, 104, 283-301.
16. Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 39-58.
17. O'Donohue, W. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2007). Science is an essential safeguard against human error. In W. T. O'Donohue & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 3-27). New York: Routledge.
18. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51-71.
19. Schwenk, C. (2006). A meta analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy dialectical inquiry. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 303-306.
20. Spitzer, R. L. (2009, July 2). APA and DSM-V: Empty promises. Psychiatric Times, 2. Retrieved October 21, 2012, from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1425844
21. Svenson, O., & Maule, J. (Eds.). (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision-making. New York: Plenum.
22. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment: Vol. II. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 261-292). London: Sage.
23. Widiger, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2000). Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 946-963.