A meta‐analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1989, Pages 303-306

  Schwenk, Charles ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989029856     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250100309     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy
2. Inquiry method goal difficulty and context effects on performance
3. Participation, satisfaction and productivity: a meta‐analytic review
4. The comparative effectiveness of dialectical inquiry and devil's advocacy: the impact of task biases on previous research findings
5. Effects of inquiry methods and ambiguity tolerance on prediction performance
6. Devil's advocacy in managerial decision making
7. Inquiry method effects on prediction performance
8. Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance
9. Meta‐analysis of facial identification studies
10. Shared influence and organizational behavior: a meta‐analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participant‐outcome relationships