In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 227-235

  Czasch, Pascal ^a   Ilie, Nicoleta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bulk fill; Composite; Degree of conversion; Macromechanical properties; Micromechanical properties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871933493     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ferracane JL (2011) Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 27: 29-38. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2010. 10. 020.
2. Venus® bulk fill Technical Information (2011) http://www. heraeus-venus. com/en/usa/products_10/venusbulkfill/technicalinformation_2. html.
3. Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH (2001) Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 17: 253-259.
4. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63: 1396-1399.
5. Leinfelder KF (1995) Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 126(5): 663-672.
6. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24.
7. McCullock AJ, Smith BG (1986) In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J 161: 450-452.
8. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB (2001) Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 26: 406-411.
9. Surefil® SDR™ flow Product Brochure (2010) Dentsply international. http://www. surefilsdrflow. com/sites/default/files/SureFil_Brochure. pdf.
10. Burgess J, Cakir D (2010) Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 31(2): 10-15.
11. Ilie N, Hickel R (2011) Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 27: 348-355. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2010. 11. 014.
12. de Biasi M, Calvi RM, Sossi D, Maglione M, Angerame D (2010) Microhardness of a new flowable composite liner for posterior restorations. Dent Mater 26: e25-e25. doi: DOI: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2010. 08. 061.
13. Ilie N, Hickel R (2010) Shrinkage behaviour of novel flowable composites based on the SDR(TM) technology. Dent Mater 26: e130-e130. doi: DOI: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2009. 11. 089.
14. Giovannetti A, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Pacifici E, Ferrari M (2010) Post retention using a new resin-based composite with low curing stress. Dent Mater 26: e72-e72. doi: DOI: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2010. 08. 162.
15. Leprince JG, Leveque P, Nysten B, Gallez B, Devaux J, Leloup G New insight into the "depth of cure" of dimethacrylate-based dental composites. Dent Mater. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2011. 12. 004.
16. Moore BK, Platt JA, Borges G, Chu TM, Katsilieri I (2008) Depth of cure of dental resin composites: ISO 4049 depth and microhardness of types of materials and shades. Oper Dent 33: 408-412.
17. Hansen EK, Asmussen E (1997) Visible-light curing units: correlation between depth of cure and distance between exit window and resin surface. Acta Odontol Scand 55: 162-166.
18. Pires JA, Cvitko E, Denehy GE, Swift EJ Jr (1993) Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quintessence Int 24: 517-521.
19. Price RB, Derand T, Sedarous M, Andreou P, Loney RW (2000) Effect of distance on the power density from two light guides. J Esthet Dent 12: 320-327.
20. Ernst CP, Meyer GR, Muller J, Stender E, Ahlers MO, Willershausern B (2004) Depth of cure of LED vs QTH light-curing devices at a distance of 7 mm. J Adhes Dent 6: 141-150.
21. Surefil®SDR™ flow Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base-Directions for use (2009) DENTSPLY Caulk. http://www. caulk. com/assets/pdfs/products/Surefil%20SDR%20Flow%203-Language%20DFU. pdf.
22. Venus® bulk fill-Instructions for use (2010) Heraeus Kulzer. http://venusbulkfill. com/media/webmedia_local/media/pdfs/VenusBulkFillDFU_English. pdf.
23. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G (2002) Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 23: 1819-1829.
24. Vertise Flow Technical Bulletin (2011) http://eu. vertiseflow. com/files/bullettin_vertise_e. pdf.
25. Vertise Flow-Product details-FAQ (2010) http://eu. vertiseflow. com/en/product_details. html?page=faq.
26. Buonocore MG (1955) A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34: 849-853.
27. Glenn JF (1979) Comments on Dr. Bowen's presentation. J Dent Res 58: 1504-1506. doi: 10. 1177/00220345790580051401.
28. Ling L, Xu X, Choi GY, Billodeaux D, Guo G, Diwan RM (2009) Novel F-releasing composite with improved mechanical properties. J Dent Res 88: 83-88. doi: 10. 1177/0022034508328254.
29. Asmussen E (1983) Factors affecting the color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 41: 11-18.
30. SDR™ Scientific Compendium (2011) http://www. dentsply. eu/bausteine. net/file/showfile. aspx?downdaid=8854& sp=E& domid=1042& fd=2.
31. Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC (2009) Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 25: 1411-1418. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2009. 06. 009.
32. Ferracane JL, Greener EH (1986) The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 20: 121-131. doi: 10. 1002/jbm. 820200111.
33. Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Hotta Y, Hotta M, Idono T, Yamamoto K (2009) Examination of composite resins with electron microscopy, microhardness tester and energy dispersive X-ray microanalyzer. Dent Mater J 28: 102-112.
34. Alvarez-Gayosso C, Barcelo-Santana F, Guerrero-Ibarra J, Saez-Espinola G, Canseco-Martinez MA (2004) Calculation of contraction rates due to shrinkage in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 20: 228-235. doi: 10. 1016/s0109-5641(03)00097-6.
35. Ellakwa A, Cho N, Lee IB (2007) The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater 23: 1229-1235. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2006. 11. 004.
36. Ge J, Trujillo M, Stansbury J (2005) Synthesis and photopolymerization of low shrinkage methacrylate monomers containing bulky substituent groups. Dent Mater 21: 1163-1169. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2005. 02. 002.
37. Lee JH, Um CM, Lee IB (2006) Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater 22: 515-526. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2005. 05. 008.
38. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O (2002) The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 87: 642-649.
39. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16: 33-40.
40. Frauscher KE, Ilie N (2011) Depth of cure and mechanical properties of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10. 1007/s00784-011-0647-3.
41. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA (1985) Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 64: 1396-1401.
42. Pilo R, Cardash HS (1992) Post-irradiation polymerization of different anterior and posterior visible light-activated resin composites. Dent Mater 8: 299-304.
43. Hansen EK, Asmussen E (1993) Correlation between depth of cure and surface hardness of a light-activated resin. Scand J Dent Res 101: 62-64.
44. Akram S, Ali Abidi SY, Ahmed S, Meo AA, Fazal-Ur-Rehman Q (2011) Effect of different irradiation times on microhardness and depth of cure of a nanocomposite resin. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 21: 411-414. doi: 07. 2011/jcpsp. 411414.
45. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM (2009) Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent Mater 25: 1338-1346. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2009. 06. 003.
46. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH (1998) Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 77: 1435-1445.
47. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Watts D, Silikas N, Eliades G (2007) 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 23: 272-278. doi: 10. 1016/j. dental. 2006. 01. 020.
48. Baroudi K, Silikas N, Watts DC (2008) Edge-strength of flowable resin composites. J Dent 36: 63-68. doi: 10. 1016/j. jdent. 2007. 10. 006.
49. Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K (2005) Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage. Oper Dent 30: 239-249.