Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas

Cities

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 18-30

  Monzón, Andrés ^a   Ortega, Emilio ^a   López, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Accessibility indicators; Efficiency impacts; High speed rail (HSR); Spatial equity; Urban areas

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; GIS; HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; METHODOLOGY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84871929526     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adler N., Pels E., Nash C. High-speed rail & air transport competition: Game engineering as tool for cost-benefit analysis. Transportation Research Part B 2010, 44(7):812-833.
2. Banister D., Berechman Y. The economic development effects of transport investments. Transport projects programmes, and policies: Evaluation needs and capabilities 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot. A. Pearman, P. Mackie, J. Nellthorp (Eds.).
3. Baradaran S., Ramjerdi F. Performance of accessibility measures in Europe. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 2001, 4(2/3):31-48. Special issue on Methodological issue in accessibility.
4. Blum U., Haynes K.E., Karlsson C. Introduction to the special issue: The regional and urban effects of high-speed trains. The annals of regional science 1997, 31(1):1-20.
5. Bröcker, J., Capello, R., Lundqvist, L., Meyer, J., Rouwendal, J., Schneekloth, N., et al. (2004). Final report of action 2.1.1. of the European spatial planning observatory network (ESPON) 2000-2006. Christian-Albreschts-Universität Kiel, Kiel.
6. Bröcker J., Korzhenevych A., Schürmann C. Assessing spatial equity and efficiency impacts of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part B 2010, 44:795-811.
7. Bruinsma F.R., Rietveld P. Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks. Urban Studies 1993, 30(6):919-934.
8. Bruinsma F.R., Rietveld P. The accessibility of European cities: Theoretical framework and comparison of approaches. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30:499-521.
9. Button K.J. Transport economics 1993, University Press, Cambridge.
10. Campos J., de Rus G. Some stylized facts about high-speed rail: A review of HSR experiences around the world. Transport Policy 2009, 16:19-28.
11. Domanski R. Accessibility, efficiency and spatial organization. Environment and Planning 1979, 11:1189-1206.
12. EC (1999). European spatial development perspective (ESDP): Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Committee of Spatial Development, Luxembourg.
13. Garmendia, M., Ureña, J. M., & Coronado, J. M. (in press). Long-distance trips in a sparsely populated region: The impact of high-speed infrastructures. Journal of Transport Geography. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.002.
14. Geurs, K., & Ritsema van Eck, J. R. (2001). Accessibility measures: Review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impacts. RIVM Rapport 408505006, RIVM. Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
15. Geurs K., Ritsema van Eck J.R. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: The implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30:69-87.
16. Geurs K.T., van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12(2):127-140.
17. Givoni M. Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: A review. Transport Reviews 2006, 26(5):593-611.
18. Gutiérrez J. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography 2001, 9(4):229-242.
19. Gutiérrez J., González R., Gómez G. The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography 1996, 4(4):227-238.
20. Gutiérrez J., Monzón A., Piñero J.M. Accessibility, network efficiency, and transport infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30:1337-1350.
21. Halden D. Accessibility analysis: concepts and their application to transport policy, programme and project evaluation. Transport projects programmes and policies: Evaluation needs and capabilities 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot. A. Pearman, P. Mackie, J. Nellthorp (Eds.).
22. Hay A. Equity and welfare in the geography of public transport provision. Journal of Transport Geography 1993, 1(2):95-101.
23. Holl A. Twenty years of accessibility improvements: The case of the Spanish motorway building programme. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15(4):286-297.
24. Kobayashi K., Okumura M. The growth of city systems with high-speed railway systems. Annals of Regional Science 1997, 31(1):39-56.
25. Laird J.J., Nellthorp J., Mackie P. Network effects and total economic impact in transport appraisal. Transport Policy 2005, 12:537-544.
26. López E., Gutiérrez J., Gómez G. Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: An accessibility approach. European Planning Studies 2008, 16(2):277-301.
27. López E., Monzón A. Integration of sustainability issues in strategic transportation planning: A multi-criteria model for the assessment of transport infrastructure plans. Computer Aided and Civil Infrastructure Engineering 2010, 25:440-451.
28. López E., Monzón A., Ortega E., Mancebo S. Assessment of cross-border spillover effects of national transport infrastructure plans: An accessibility approach. Transport Reviews 2009, 29(4):515-536.
29. Martin F. Justifying a high-speed rail project: Social value vs. regional growth. The Annals of Regional Science 1997, 31:155-174.
30. Martín J.C., Gutiérrez J., Román C. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: The case of the high-speed train Corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French Border. Regional Studies 2004, 38(6):697-712.
31. Martínez, H., & Givoni, M. (2009). The accessibility impact of a new High-speed Rail line in the UK - A preliminary analysis of winners and losers working paper N° 1041, Transport studies unit. School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.
32. Ministerio de Fomento (2005). Plan estratégico de infraestructuras y transporte 2005-2020 (PEIT). Secretaría de Estado de Infraestructuras y Planificación, Dirección General de Planificación y Coordinación Territorial, Madrid.
33. Peters D. Cohesion, policentricity, missing links and bottlenecks: Conflicting spatial storylines for Pan-European transport investments. European Planning Studies 2003, 11(3):317-339.
34. Plassard E. Le train á grande vitesse et le réseau des villes. Transports 1991, 345:14-22.
35. Pol, P. M. J. (2003). The economic impact of the high-speed train on urban regions. European regional science association econpapers. (Retrieved 06.12.09). http://www.ersa.org.
36. Puga D. European regional policy in light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography 2002, 2(4):372-406.
37. Reggiani A. Accessibility, trade and location behaviour 1998, Ashgate, Aldershot.
38. Rietveld P., Nijkamp P. Transport and regional development. European transport economics, European conference of ministers of transport (ECMT) 1993, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. J. Polak, A. Heertje (Eds.).
39. Román C., Espino R., Martín J.C. Analyzing competition between the high speed train and alternative modes: The case of the Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona Corridor. Journal of Choice Modelling 2010, 3(1):84-108.
40. Schürmann, C., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M., (1997). Accessibility indicators. Berichte aus dem Institüt for Raumplanung 39, IRPUD, Dortmund.
41. Talen E. Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 1998, 64(1):22-49.
42. Talen E., Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A 1996, 30:595-613.
43. Ureña, J. M., Garmendia, M., Coronado, J. M., Vickerman, R., & Romero, V., (2010). New metropolitan processes encouraged by high-speed rail: The cases of London and Madrid. In 12th WCTR, Lisbon-Portugal proceedings.
44. Ureña J.M., Menerault P., Garmendia M. The high-speed rail challenge for big intermediate cities: A national, regional and local perspective. Cities 2009, 26(5):266-279.
45. van den Berg L., Pol P.M.J. The urban implications of the developing European high-speed-train network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 1998, 16(4):483-497.
46. van Winden W., van der Berg L., Pol P. European cities in the knowledge economy: Towards a typology. Urban Studies 2007, 44(3):525-549.
47. Vickerman R., Spiekermann K., Wegener M. Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies 1999, 33(1):1-15.
48. Vickerman R., Ulied A. Indirect and wider economic impacts of high speed rail. Economic analysis of high speed rail in Europe 2009, 89-118. Fundación BBVA, Madrid. G. de Rus (Ed.).