Analyzing competition between the high speed train and alternative modes. The case of the Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona corridor

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 84-108

  Román, Concepción ^a   Espino, Raquel ^a   Martín, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

HST Elasticities; Intermodal Competition Stated Preference (SP); Mixed RP SP data; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955080227     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70030-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ahern, A. A. and Tapley, N., 2008. The use of stated preference techniques to model modal choices on interurban trips in Ireland. Transportation Research Part A, 42(1), 15-27.
2. Atkins, 2004. High-Speed Line Study. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Morikawa, T., 1990. Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. Proceedings 11th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Yokohama, Japan.
4. Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M., 2009. Designing Stated Choice Experiments: State-of-the-art. in Kitamura, R., Yoshi, T. and Yamamoto, T., The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research, Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Ch25, 495-498.
5. Blum, U., Haynes, K. E. and Karlsson, C., 1997. Introduction to the special issue: The regional and urban effects of high-speed trains. The Annals of Regional Science 31(1), 1-20.
6. Bradley, M. A. and Daly, A. J., 1997. Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information, in Stopher P.R. and Lee-Gosselin M. (Eds.) Understanding Travel Behavior in an Era of Change, 209-232. Pergamon, Oxford.
7. Combes, P. P. and Linnemer, L., 2000. Intermodal competition and regional inequalities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(2), 131-184.
8. Cherchi, E. and Ortúzar, J. de D., 2004. On fitting mode-specific constants in the presence of new options in RP/SP models, Transportation Research Part A, 40(1), 1-18.
9. Espino, R., Ortúzar, J. de D. and Román, C., 2006a. Analysing demand for suburban trips: a mixed RP/SP model with latent variables and interaction effects. Transportation, 33(3), 241-261.
10. Espino, R., Ortúzar, J. de D. and Román, C., 2006b. Confidence interval for willingness to pay measures in mode choice models. Networks and Spatial Economics, 6(2), 77-92.
11. Fröidh, O., 2005. Market effects of regional high-speed trains on the Svealand line. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(4), 352-361.
12. González-Savignat, M., 2004. Competition in air transport. The case of the high speed train. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38(1), 77-108.
13. Gutiérrez, J., 2001. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4), 229-242.
14. Gutiérrez, J., González, R. and Gómez, G., 1996. The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography 4(4), 227-238.
15. Haynes, K. E., 1997. Labor markets and regional transportation improvements: the case of high-speed trains: An introduction and review. The Annals of Regional Science, 3191), 57-76.
16. Jara-Díaz, S. R., 1998. Time and income in travel choice: towards a microeconomic activity-based theoretical framework, in Garling T., Laitila T. and Westin K. (Eds) Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling, 51-74. Elsevier Science, Nueva York.
17. Jara-Díaz, S. R. and Farah, M., 1987. Transport demand and users' benefits with fixed income: the goods/leisure trade-off revisited. Transportation Research Part B, 21(2), 165-170.
18. Laird, J. J., Nellthorp, J. and Mackie, P. J., 2005. Network effects and total economic impact in transport appraisal. Transport Policy, 12(6), 537-544.
19. Lancaster, K. J., 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 14, 132-157.
20. Levinson, D., Mathieu, J. M., Gillen, D. and Kanafani, A., 1997. The full cost of high speed rail: an engineering approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 31(2), 189-215.
21. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D., 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Martin, F., 1997. Justifying a high-speed rail project: social value vs. regional growth. The Annals of Regional Science, 31(2), 155-174.
23. Martín, J. C. and Nombela, G., 2007. Microeconomic impacts of investments in high speed trains in Spain. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(3), 715-733.
24. Martín; J. C. Gutiérrez., J, and,Román C., 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: The case of the high-speed train corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French border, Regional Studies, 38(6), 697-712.
25. McFadden, D. 1974. The measurement of urban travel demand, Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 303-328.
26. Nash, C. A., 1991. The case for high speed rail Institute for Transport Studies. The University of Leeds Working Paper 323, Leeds.
27. Ortúzar, J. de .D. and Simonetti, C., 2008. Modelling the demand for medium distance air travel with the mixed data estimation method. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(6), 297-303.
28. Ortúzar, J. de D. and Willumsen, L. G., 2001. Modelling Transport. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
29. Plassard, F., 1994. High speed transport and regional development, in the European Conference of Ministers of Transport (Eds) Regional Policy Transport Network. OECD, Paris.
30. Rigas, K., 2009. Boat or airplane? Passengers' perceptions of transport services to islands. The example of the Greek domestic leisure market. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 396-401.
31. Rizzi, L.I. and Ortúzar, J de D., 2003. Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35(1), 9-22.
32. Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Hensher, D. A. and Collins, A. C., 2008. Designing efficient stated choice experiments involving respondent based reference alternatives. Transportation Research Part B, 42(4), 395-406
33. Rus, G. de and Inglada, V., 1993. Análisis coste-beneficio del tren de alta velocidad en España. Revista de Economía Aplicada 3, 27-48.
34. Rus, G. de and Inglada, V., 1997. Cost-benefit analysis of the high-speed train in Spain. The Annals of Regional Science, 31, 175-188.
35. Rus, G. de and Nombela, G., 2004. Is the investment in High Speed Rail socially profitable? Documento de trabajo EIT. Universidad de Las Palmas.
36. Rus, G. de and Román, C., 2006. Análisis económico de la línea de alta velocidad Madrid-Barcelona. Revista de Economía Aplicada XIV(42), 35-79.
37. Short, J. and Kopp, A., 2005. Transport infrastructure: Investment and planning. Policy and research aspects, Transport Policy 12(4), 360-367.
38. Sichelschmidt, H., 1999. The EU programme "trans-European networks"- critical assessment. Transport Policy, 6(3), 169-181.
39. Steer Davies Gleave, 2004. High speed rail: International comparisons. Commission for Integrated Transport, London.
40. Train, K., 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Train, K., Wilson, W. W., 2008. Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices. Transportation Research Part B, 42(3), 191-203.
42. van Exel, J., Rienstra, S., Gommers, M., Pearman, A. and Tsamboulas D., 2002. EU involvement in TEN development: network effects and European value added, Transport Policy, 9(4), 299-311.
43. Vickerman, R. W., 1995. The regional impacts of Trans-European networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 29(2), 237-254.
44. Vickerman, R. W., 1997. High-speed rail in Europe: experience and issues for future development. The Annals of Regional Science, 31(1), 21-38.
45. Vickerman, R. W., Spiekermann, K. and Wegener, M., 1999. Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1-15.