How does subsurface characterization affect simulations of hyporheic exchange?

GroundWater

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-28

  Ward, Adam S ^a   Gooseff, Michael N ^a   Singha, Kamini ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING; CALIBRATED MODEL; DATA YIELDS; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; FLOW AND TRANSPORT; FLOW PATH; FLOW-PATH NETWORKS; GEOLOGIC MAPS; GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES; GEOPHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS; HEADWATER STREAM; HILLSLOPES; HYPORHEIC; HYPORHEIC EXCHANGE; MODEL GEOMETRY; MODEL PREDICTION; PARTICLE TRACKING; RESIDENCE TIME; RESIDENCE TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; SEISMIC REFRACTION; SOLUTE TRACERS; STREAMBEDS; SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES; SURFACE OBSERVATION; THREE ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE;

ARCHITECTURE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LITHOLOGY; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

STREAM FLOW;

GROUND WATER;

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; CALIBRATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; FLOW MODELING; FLOW PATTERN; HEADWATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYPORHEIC ZONE; LITHOLOGY; SIMULATION; STREAM BED; SUBSURFACE FLOW; TRACER; TRANSPORT PROCESS;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; WATER FLOW;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GROUNDWATER; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 84871925443     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00911.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Advanced Geosciences, Inc. 2008. Instruction Manual for EarthImager 2D v2.3.0.
2. Anderson, J., S. Wondzell, M. Gooseff, and R. Haggerty. 2005. Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA. Hydrological Processes 19, no. 15: 2931-2949.
3. Bevc, D., and H. Morrison. 1991. Borehole-to-surface electrical resistivity monitoring of a salt water injection experiment. Geophysics 56, no. 6: 769-777.
4. Beven, K. 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology 320, no. 1-2: 18-36.
5. Binley, A., G. Cassiani, and R. Deiana. 2010. Hydrogeophysics: Opportunities and challenges. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 51, no. 4: 267-284.
6. Binley, A., S. Henry-Poulter, and B. Shaw. 1996a. Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography. Water Resources Research 32, no. 4: 763-769.
7. Binley, A., B. Shaw, and S. Henry-Poulter. 1996b. Flow pathways in porous media: Electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification. Measurement Science and Technology 7: 384.
8. Boulton, A., T. Datry, T. Kasahara, M. Mutz, and J. Stanford. 2010. Ecology and management of the hyporheic zone: Stream-groundwater interactions of running waters and their floodplains. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29, no. 1: 26-40.
9. Bredehoeft, J., and L. Konikow. 1993. Ground water models: Validate or invalidate. Ground Water 31, no. 2: 178-179.
10. Brosten, T.R., J.H. Bradford, J.P. McNamara, M.N. Gooseff, J.P. Zarnetske, W.B. Bowden, and M.E. Johnston. 2009. Estimating 3D variation in active-layer thickness beneath arctic streams using ground-penetrating radar. Journal of Hydrology 373, no. 3-4: 479-486.
11. Brunke, M., and T. Gonser. 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology 37: 1-33.
12. Brunner, G. 2006. HEC-RAS River Analysis System User's Manual (Version 4.0 Beta). US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC).
13. Burger, H.R., A.F. Sheehan, and C.H. Jones. 2006. Introduction to Applied Geophysics: Exploring the Shallow Subsurface. New York: WW Norton.
14. Cardenas, M., J. Wilson, and V. Zlotnik. 2004. Impact of heterogeneity, bed forms, and stream curvature on subchannel hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research 40, no. 8: W08307.
15. COMSOL, Inc. 2008. version 3.5, User's Guide and Reference Guide. Burlington, Massachusetts: COMSOL.
16. Crook, N., A. Binley, R. Knight, D. Robinson, J. Zarnetske, and R. Haggerty. 2008. Electrical resistivity imaging of the architecture of sub-stream sediments. Water Resources Research 44.
17. Day-Lewis, F., K. Singha, and A. Binley. 2005. Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution-dependent limitations. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, no. B8: B08206.
18. Friedel, S. 2003. Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach. Geophysical Journal International 153, no. 2: 305-316.
19. Gooseff, M.N., J.K. Anderson, S.M. Wondzell, J. LaNier, and R. Haggerty. 2006. A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA. Hydrological Processes 20, no. 11: 2443-2457.
20. Hassan, A.E. 2004. Validation of numerical ground water models used to guide decision making. Ground Water 42, no. 2: 277-290.
21. Hester, E.T., and M.W. Doyle. 2008. In-stream geomorphic structures as drivers of hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research 44.
22. Jones, K.L., G.C. Poole, W.W. Woessner, M.V. Vitale, B.R. Boer, S.J. O'Daniel, S.A. Thomas, and B.A. Geffen. 2008. Geomorphology, hydrology, and aquatic vegetation drive seasonal hyporheic flow patterns across a gravel dominated floodplain. Hydrological Processes 22, no. 13: 2105-2113.
23. Kasahara, T., and S.M. Wondzell. 2003. Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams. Water Resources Research 39, no. 1: 1005.
24. Kemna, A., B. Kulessa, and H. Vereecken. 2002. Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models. Journal of Hydrology 267, no. 4: 125-146.
25. Koch, K., J. Wenninger, S. Uhlenbrook, and M. Bonell. 2009. Joint interpretation of hydrological and geophysical data: Electrical resistivity tomography results from a process hydrological research site in the Black Forest Mountains, Germany. Hydrological Processes 23, no. 10: 1501-1513.
26. Konikow, L.F., and J.D. Bredehoeft. 1992. Ground-water models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources 15, no. 1: 75-83.
27. Kostelnik, K., J. Lynch, J. Grimm, and E. Corbett. 1989. Sample size requirements for estimation of throughfall chemistry beneath a mixed hardwood forest. Journal of Environmental Quality 18, no. 3: 274-280.
28. Krause, S., D. Hannah, J. Fleckenstein, C. Heppell, D. Kaeser, R. Pickup, G. Pinay, A. Robertson, and P. Wood. 2010. Interdisciplinary perspectives on processes in the hyporheic zone. Ecohydrology 4, no. 4: 481-499.
29. Kuntz, B., S. Rubin, B. Berkowitz, and K. Singha. 2011. Quantifying solute transport behavior at the Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory. Vadose Zone Journal 10, 15 p. DOI: 10.2136/vzj2010.0130.
30. Lautz, L., and D. Siegel. 2006. Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D. Advances in Water Resources 29, no. 11: 1618-1633.
31. Lesmes, D.P., and S.P. Friedman. 2005. Relationships between the electrical and hydrogeological properties of rocks and soils. In Hydrogeophysics, ed. Y. Rubin and S.S. Hubbard, 87-128. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
32. Linde, N., J. Chen, M.B. Kowalsky, and S. Hubbard. 2006. Hydrogeophysical parameter estimation approaches for field scale characterization. In Applied Hydrogeophysics, ed. H. Vereecken, A. Binley, G. Cassiani, A. Revil, and K. Titov, 9-44. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
33. Lynch, J., and E. Corbett. 1989. Hydrologic control of sulfate mobility in a forested watershed. Water Resources Research 25, no. 7: 1695-1703.
34. Lynch, J.A., C.M. Hanna, and E.S. Corbett. 1986. Predicting pH, alkalinity, and total acidity in stream water during episodic events. Water Resources Research 22, no. 6: 905-912.
35. Mayes, M., P. Jardine, I. Larsen, S. Brooks, and S. Fendorf. 2000. Multispecies transport of metal-EDTA complexes and chromate through undisturbed columns of weathered fractured saprolite. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 45, no. 3-4: 243-265.
36. Naegeli, M.W., P. Huggenberger, and U. Uehlinger. 1996. Ground penetrating radar for assessing sediment structures in the hyporheic zone of a Prealpine river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15, no. 3: 353-366.
37. Nyquist, J., P. Freyer, and L. Toran. 2008. Stream Bottom Resistivity Tomography to Map Ground Water Discharge. Ground Water 46, no. 4: 561-569.
38. Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263: 4.
39. Packman, A.I., and M. Salehin. 2003. Relative roles of stream flow and sedimentary conditions in controlling hyporheic exchange. Hydrobiologia 494, no. 1: 291-297.
40. Pollock, D., and O. Cirpka. 2010. Fully coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of synthetic salt tracer experiments. Water Resources Research 46, no. 7: W07501.
41. Pride, S.R. 2005. Relationships between seismic and hydrological properties. In Hydrogeophysics, ed. Y. Rubin and S.S. Hubbard, 253-290. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
42. Rishel, G.B., J.A. Lynch, and E. Corbett. 1982. Seasonal stream temperature changes following forest harvesting. Journal of Environmental Quality;(United States) 11, no. 1: 112-116.
43. Ryan, R.J., and M.C. Boufadel. 2006. Influence of streambed hydraulic conductivity on solute exchange with the hyporheic zone. Environmental Geology 51, no. 2: 203-210.
44. Saenger, N., P.K. Kitanidis, and R.L. Street. 2005. A numerical study of surface-subsurface exchange processes at a riffle-pool pair in the Lahn River, Germany. Water Resources Research 41.
45. Salehin, M., A.I. Packman, and M. Paradis. 2004. Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous streambeds: Laboratory experiments and modeling. Water Resources Research 40, no. 11: W11504.
46. Sawyer, A., and M. Cardenas. 2009. Hyporheic flow and residence time distributions in heterogeneous cross-bedded sediment. Water Resources Research 45, no. 8: W08406.
47. Schima, S., D.J. LaBrecque, and P.D. Lundegard. 1996. Monitoring air sparging using resistivity tomography. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 16, no. 2: 131-138.
48. Sevan, W.D., 2000, Map 13: Physiographic Provinces of Pennsylvania. Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
49. Shields, R.R., and W.E. Sopper. 1969. An application of surface geophysical techniques to the study of watershed hydrology. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 5, no. 3: 37-49.
50. Singha, K., and S. Moysey. 2006. Accounting for spatially variable resolution in electrical resistivity tomography through field-scale rock-physics relations. Geophysics 71, no. 4: A25.
51. Singha, K., A. Pidlisecky, F. Day-Lewis, and M. Gooseff. 2008. Electrical characterization of non-Fickian transport in groundwater and hyporheic systems. Water Resources Research 44, no. 3.
52. Slater, L., A. Binley, and D. Brown. 1997. Electrical imaging of fractures using ground-water salinity change. Ground Water 35, no. 3: 436-442.
53. Slater, L., A. Binley, W. Daily, and R. Johnson. 2000. Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics 44, no. 2-3: 85-102.
54. Slater, L., A. Binley, R. Versteeg, G. Cassiani, R. Birken, and S. Sandberg. 2002. A 3D ERT study of solute transport in a large experimental tank. Journal of Applied Geophysics 49, no. 4: 211-229.
55. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2008. Soil Survey of Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. Version 3. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov (accessed March 28, 2010).
56. Vaux, W.G. 1968. Intragravel flow and interchange of water in a streambed. Fishery Bulletin 66, no. 3: 479.
57. Ward, A., M.N. Gooseff, and K. Singha. 2010a. Characterizing hyporheic transport processes-Interpretation of electrical geophysical data in coupled stream-hyporheic zone systems during solute tracer studies. Advances in Water Resources 33, no. 11: 1320-1330. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.05.008.
58. Ward, A.S., M.N. Gooseff, and K. Singha. 2010b. Imaging hyporheic zone solute transport using electrical resistivity. Hydrological Processes 24, no. 7: 948-953.
59. Ward, A.S., M.N. Gooseff, and P.A. Johnson. 2011. How can subsurface modifications to hydraulic conductivity be designed as stream restoration structures? Analysis of Vaux's conceptual models to enhance hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research. DOI: 10.1029/2010WR010028.
60. White, P.A. 1988. Measurement of ground water parameters using salt water injection and surface resistivity. Ground Water 26, no. 2: 179-186.
61. Wondzell, S., J. LaNier, R. Haggerty, R. Woodsmith, and R. Edwards. 2009. Changes in hyporheic exchange flow following experimental wood removal in a small, low-gradient stream. Water Resources Research 45 no. 5: W05406.
62. Wroblicky, G.J., M.E. Campana, H.M. Valett, and C.N. Dahm. 1998. Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 34, no. 3: 317-328.