Stream bottom resistivity tomography to map ground water discharge

Ground Water

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 561-569

  Nyquist, Jonathan E ^a   Freyer, Paul A ^a   Toran, Laura ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM LAYERS; CARBONATE BEDROCK; CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA; CLAY SEDIMENTS; DIRECT CURRENT; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GROUND WATER DISCHARGE; METER SCALE; MIDDLE LAYER; PORE FLUIDS; RESISTIVITY DATA; RESISTIVITY LAYERS; RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; RESISTIVITY VALUES; SEDIMENT SAMPLES; STREAM CONDITION; STREAM WATER QUALITY; STREAMBED SEDIMENTS; STREAMBEDS; SUBSURFACE HETEROGENEITY; SURFACE LAYERS; WATER INTERACTIONS;

CLAY MINERALS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GROUNDWATER; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SURVEYS; TOMOGRAPHY; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

RIVERS;

BEDROCK; CARBONATE; CLAY; DISCHARGE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; INFILTRATION; SEEPAGE; STREAM; TOMOGRAPHY; WATER QUALITY;

NORTH AMERICA; PENNSYLVANIA; UNITED STATES;

WATER;

ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; SEDIMENT; TOMOGRAPHY;

GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; TOMOGRAPHY; WATER;

EID: 49649097464     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00432.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Archie, G.E. 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers 146: 54-62.
2. ASTM. 2003. Standard test method for field measurement of soil resistivity using the Wenner four-electrode method. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Method G57-95a, vol. 03.02, sec. 3, 229-233. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International.
3. Cey, E.E., D.L. Rudolph, G.W. Parkin, and R. Aravena. 1998. Quantifying groundwater discharge to a small perennial stream in southern Ontario, Canada. Journal of Hydrology 210, no. 1-4: 21-37.
4. Cherkauer, D.S. 1991. Geophysical mapping of pathways for entry of contaminated groundwater to lakes and rivers: Application in the North American Great Lakes. Hydrological Sciences and Technology 7, no. 1-4: 35-44.
5. Cherkauer, D.S., and R.W. Taylor. 1990. The spatially continuous determination of ground water flow to surface water bodies: Application to the connecting channels between Lakes Huron and Erie. Journal of Hydrology 114, no. 3-4: 349-369.
6. Cherkauer, D.S., and R.W. Taylor. 1988. Geophysically determined ground water flow into the channels connecting Lakes Huron and Erie. In Proceedings of 2nd National Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water Monitoring and Geophysical Methods, 779-799. Las Vegas, Nevada: Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers.
7. Cherkauer, D.S., R.W. Taylor, and K.R. Bradbury. 1987. Relation of lake bed leakance to geoelectrical properties. Ground Water 15, no. 2: 135-140.
8. Conant, B. 2004. Delineating and quantifying ground water discharge zones using streambed temperatures. Ground Water 42, no. 2: 243-257.
9. Constable, S., R.L. Parker, and C.G. Constable. 1987. Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52, no. 3: 289-300.
10. Day-Lewis, F., E.A. White, C.D. Johnson, J.W. Lane Jr., and M. Belaval. 2006. Continuous resistivity profiling to delineate submarine groundwater discharge-Examples and limitations. The Leading Edge 25, no. 6: 724-728.
11. Freyer, P.A. 2006. Stream bottom underwater resistivity investigation of groundwater/surface water interactions, southcentral Pennsylvania. Masters thesis, Department of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
12. Freyer, P.A., J.E. Nyquist, and L. Toran. 2006. Use of underwater resistivity in the assessment of groundwater-surface water interaction within the Burd Run Watershed. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 8. Seattle, Washington: Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.
13. Friedel, S. 2003. Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach. Geophysical Journal International 153, no. 2: 305-316.
14. Kelly, S.E., and L.C. Murdoch. 2003. Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of shallow submerged sediments. Ground Water 41, no. 4: 431-439.
15. Kwon, H., J. Kim, H. Ahn, J. Yoon, K. Kim, C. Jung, S. Lee, and T. Uchida. 2005. Delineation of a fault zone beneath a riverbed by an electrical resistivity survey using a floating streamer cable. Exploration Geophysics 36, no. 1: 50-58.
16. Lautz, L.K., and D.I. Siegel. 2006. Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOWand MT3D. Advances in Water Resources 29, no. 11: 1618-1633.
17. Leroux, V., and T. Dahlin. 2006. Time-lapse resistivity investigations for imaging saltwater transport in glaciofluvial sediments. Environmental Geology 49, no. 3: 347-358.
18. Lindsey, B.D. 2005. Hydrogeology and simulation of source areas of water production wells in a Colluvium Mantled Aquifer near Shippensburg, Cumberland and Franklin Counties, Pennsylvania. SIR 2005-5195. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
19. Loke, M.H., and R.D. Barker. 1996. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysical Prospecting 44, no. 3: 499-523.
20. Manheim, F.T., D.E. Krantz, and J.F. Bratton. 2004. Studying ground water under Delmarva coastal bays using electrical resistivity. Ground Water 42, no. 7: 1052-1068.
21. Manheim, F.T., D.E. Krantz, D.S. Snyder, and B. Sturgis. 2002. Streamer resistivity surveys in Delmarva coastal bays. In Proceedings from the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 1-18. Las Vegas, Nevada: Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.
22. Oxtobee, J.P.A., and K.A. Novakowski. 2002. A field investigation of groundwater/surface water interaction in a fractured bedrock environment. Journal of Hydrology 269, no. 3-4: 169-193. Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access (PASDA). 2006http://www.pasda.psu.edu/(accessedJanuary2006).
23. Rein, A., R. Hoffmann, and P. Dietrich. 2004. Influence of natural time-dependent variations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurements. Journal of Hydrology 285, no. 1: 215-232.
24. Reynolds, J.M. 1997. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Samouëlian, A., I. Cousin, A. Tabbagh, A. Bruand, and G. Richard. 2005. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: A review. Soil & Tillage Research 83, no. 2: 173-193.
26. Shirk, W.D. 1980. A Guide to the Geology of Southcentral Pennsylvania. Chambersburg, Pennsylvania: Robson & Kaye Inc.
27. Snyder, D.D., and E.W. Wightman. 2002. Application of continuous resistivity profiling to aquifer characterization. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 1-21. Las Vegas, Nevada: Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.
28. Sophocleous, M. 2002. Interactions between ground water and surface water: The state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 10, no. 1: 52-67.
29. Taylor, R.W., and D.S. Cherkauer. 1984. The application of combined seismic and electrical measurements to the determination of the hydraulic conductivity of a lake bed. Ground Water Monitoring Review 4, no. 4: 78-85.
30. Winter, T.C. 1999. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal 7, no. 1: 28-45.
31. Woessner, W.W. 2000. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrologic thought. Ground Water 38, no. 3: 423-429.
32. Wroblicky, G.J., M.E. Campana, H.M. Valett, and C.N. Dahm. 1998. Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 34, no. 3: 317-328.
33. Yang, X., and M.B. Lagmanson. 2003. Planning resistivity surveys using numerical simulations. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium for the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, 488-501. San Antonio, Texas: Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.