Monitoring air sparging using resistivity tomography

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 131-138

  Schima, Susan ^a   LaBrecque, Douglas J ^b   Lundegard, Paul D ^c  

^a SteamTech Environmental Services   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Fred L Hartley Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR; ALGORITHMS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; FLOW PATTERNS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROCARBONS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; IMPURITIES; MONITORING; PETROCHEMICALS; SOILS; WATER WELLS;

AIR FLOW; AIR SPARGING; REMEDIATION; RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION;

EID: 0030100926     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1996.tb00133.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Archie, G.E. 1942. The electric resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. AIME 146, 54-62.
2. Brown, R., E. Henry, C. Herman, and W. Leonard. 1991. The use of aeration in environmental clean-ups. In Proceedings of the Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, 265-279, by National Water Well Association. Dublin, Ohio: NWWA.
3. Daily, W., A. Ramirez, D. LaBrecque, and J. Nitao. 1992. Electrical resistance tomography of vadose water movement. Water Resources Research 28, no. 5: 1429-1442.
4. GeoEngineers. 1992. Corrective Action Plan UNOCAL Service Station 4673, Florence, Oregon. File Number 0161-137-P18/012993. Portland, Oregon: GeoEngineers.
5. Hampton, E.R. 1963. Ground water in the coastal dune area near Florence, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1539-K. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office.
6. Ji, W., A. Dahmani, D. Ahlfeld, J. Lin, and E. Hill. 1993. Laboratory study of air sparging: Air flow visualization. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 13, no. 4: 115-126.
7. LaBrecque, D.J., E. Owen, W. Daily, and A. Ramirez. 1992. Noise and Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data: Extended abstracts of the 62nd Annual International SEG Meeting and Symposium, 397-400. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
8. Lundegard, P.D., and G. Anderson. 1993. Numerical simulation of air sparging performance. In Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, 461-476, by National Ground Water Association. Dublin, Ohio: NGWA.
9. Maxwell, J.C. 1891. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Volume 1, Dover Publication Inc.
10. Nyer, E.K., and S.S. Suthersan. 1993. Air sparging: Savior of ground water remediations or just blowing bubbles in the bath tub? Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 13, no. 4: 87-91.
11. Parasnis, D.S. 1986. Principles of applied geophysics. Fourth Edition. New York: Chapman and Hall.
12. Ramirez, A., W. Daily, D. LaBrecque, E. Owen, and D. Chesnut. 1993. Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography. Water Resources Research 29, no. 1: 73-87.
13. Schima, S., D.J. LaBrecque, and M. Miletto, M. 1993. Tracking fluid flow in the unsaturated zone using cross-borehole resistivity and IP. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2, ed. Ronald S. Bull and C. Melvin Lepper, 527-543.
14. Schlumberger. 1972. Log Interpretation Volume 1 -Principles. New York: Schlumberger Limited.