Stroke induces long-lasting deficits in the temporal fidelity of sensory processing in the somatosensory cortex

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 91-96

  Sweetnam, Danielle A ^a   Brown, Craig E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

forelimb; plasticity; recovery; secondary somatosensory cortex; stroke; voltage sensitive dye

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPOLARIZATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FOREFOOT; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE STIMULATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ANIMALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FLUORESCENT DYES; FORELIMB; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; VOLTAGE-SENSITIVE DYE IMAGING;

EID: 84871922901     PISSN: 0271678X     EISSN: 15597016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.135     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Romo R, Salinas E. Touch and go: decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation.Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24: 107-137. (Pubitemid 32695225)
2. Hsiao S. Central mechanisms of tactile shape perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol2008; 18: 418-424.
3. Blake DT, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile patternrecognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptorsto perceived roughness. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 7480-7489. (Pubitemid 27413279)
4. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Harvey MR, Puce A, Seitz RJ, Donnan GA. Relationshipbetween touch impairment and brain activation after lesions of subcortical andcortical somatosensory regions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 443-457.
5. Carey LM, Matyas TA. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand afterstroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 257-263.
6. Blennerhassett JM, Matyas TA, Carey LM. Impaired discrimination of surface frictioncontributes to pinch grip deficit after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21: 263-272. (Pubitemid 46633593)
7. Gonzalez CL, Kolb B. A comparison of different models of stroke on behaviour andbrain morphology. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18: 1950-1962. (Pubitemid 37372377)
8. Gharbawie OA, Gonzalez CL, Williams PT, Kleim JA, Whishaw IQ. Middle cerebralartery (MCA) stroke produces dysfunction in adjacent motor cortex as detected byintracortical microstimulation in rats. Neuroscience 2005; 130: 601-610. (Pubitemid 39601433)
9. Biernaskie J, Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improvedforelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemicinjury. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 5272-5280. (Pubitemid 32622952)
10. Tennant KA, Jones TA. Sensorimotor behavioral effects of endothelin-1 inducedsmall cortical infarcts in C57BL/6 mice. J Neurosci Methods 2009; 181: 18-26.
11. Clarkson AN, Huang BS, Macisaac SE, Mody I, Carmichael ST. Reducing excessiveGABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke. Nature2010; 468: 305-309.
12. Sweetnam D, Holmes A, Tennant KA, Zamani A, Walle M, Jones P et al. Diabetesimpairs cortical plasticity and functional recovery following ischemic stroke.J Neurosci 2012; 32: 5132-5143.
13. Brown CE, Aminoltejari K, Erb H, Winship IR, Murphy TH. In vivo voltage-sensitivedye imaging in adult mice reveals that somatosensory maps lost to stroke arereplaced over weeks by new structural and functional circuits with prolongedmodes of activation within both the peri-infarct zone and distant sites. J Neurosci2009; 29: 1719-1734.
14. Winship IR, Murphy TH. In vivo calcium imaging reveals functional rewiring ofsingle somatosensory neurons after stroke. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 6592-6606.
15. Dijkhuizen RM, Ren J, Mandeville JB, Wu O, Ozdag FM, Moskowitz MA et al.Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 12766-12771. (Pubitemid 33020019)
16. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour.Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 861-872.
17. Cramer SC. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneousrecovery. Ann Neurol 2008; 63: 272-287. (Pubitemid 351499857)
18. Ward NS. Functional reorganization of the cerebral motor system after stroke.Curr Opin Neurol 2004; 17: 725-730. (Pubitemid 39613005)
19. Dancause N. Vicarious function of remote cortex following stroke: recent evidencefrom human and animal studies. Neuroscientist 2006; 12: 489-499. (Pubitemid 44657964)
20. Frost SB, Barbay S, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, Nudo RJ. Reorganization of remote corticalregions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery.J Neurophysiol 2003; 89: 3205-3214. (Pubitemid 36682669)
21. Ferezou I, Bolea S, Petersen CC. Visualizing the cortical representation of whiskertouch: voltage-sensitive dye imaging in freely moving mice. Neuron 2006; 50:617-629.
22. Grinvald A, Hildesheim R. VSDI: a new era in functional imaging of corticaldynamics. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 874-885. (Pubitemid 39482156)
23. Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-eck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M et al.Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variantsof GFP. Neuron 2000; 28: 41-51.
24. Brown CE, Li P, Boyd JD, Delaney KR, Murphy TH. Extensive turnover of dendriticspines and vascular remodeling in cortical tissues recovering from stroke.J Neurosci 2007; 27: 4101-4109. (Pubitemid 46597152)
25. Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Wachtel MS, Ginsberg MD. Induction ofreproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis. Ann Neurol1985; 17: 497-504. (Pubitemid 15019990)
26. Shoham D, Glaser DE, Arieli A, Kenet T, Wijnbergen C, Toledo Y et al. Imagingcortical dynamics at high spatial and temporal resolution with novel blue voltagesensitivedyes. Neuron 1999; 24: 791-802. (Pubitemid 30017659)
27. Ding MC, Wang Q, Lo EH, Stanley GB. Cortical excitation and inhibition followingfocal traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 14085-14094.
28. Melzer P, Champney GC, Maguire MJ, Ebner FF. Rate code and temporal code forfrequency of whisker stimulation in rat primary and secondary somatic sensorycortex. Exp Brain Res 2006; 172: 370-386. (Pubitemid 43876053)
29. Troncoso E, Muller D, Korodi K, Steimer T, Welker E, Kiss JZ. Recovery of evokedpotentials, metabolic activity and behavior in a mouse model of somatosensorycortex lesion: role of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM). Cereb Cortex2004; 14: 332-341. (Pubitemid 38252724)
30. Higley MJ, Contreras D. Cellular mechanisms of suppressive interactions betweensomatosensory responses in vivo. J Neurophysiol 2007; 97: 647-658. (Pubitemid 46143386)
31. Civillico EF, Contreras D. Integration of evoked responses in supragranular cortexstudied with optical recordings in vivo. J Neurophysiol 2006; 96: 336-351. (Pubitemid 44015364)
32. Julkunen L, Tenovuo O, Jaaskelainen SK, Hamalainen H. Recovery of somatosensorydeficits in acute stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 111: 366-372.
33. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Puce A, Jackson GD, Syngeniotis A, Donnan GA. Reemergenceof activation with poststroke somatosensory recovery: a serial fMRI casestudy. Neurology 2002; 59: 749-752.
34. Domann R, Hagemann G, Kraemer M, Freund HJ, Witte OW. Electrophysiologicalchanges in the surrounding brain tissue of photochemically induced corticalinfarcts in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1993; 155: 69-72. (Pubitemid 23186671)
35. Fujioka H, Kaneko H, Suzuki SS, Mabuchi K. Hyperexcitability-associated rapidplasticity after a focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2004; 35: e346-e348.
36. Neumann-Haefelin T, Hagemann G, Witte OW. Cellular correlates of neuronalhyperexcitability in the vicinity of photochemically induced cortical infarcts in ratsin vitro. Neurosci Lett 1995; 193: 101-104.
37. Contreras D, Llinas R. Voltage-sensitive dye imaging of neocortical spatiotemporaldynamics to afferent activation frequency. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 9403-9413. (Pubitemid 33096883)
38. Sigler A, Mohajerani MH, Murphy TH. Imaging rapid redistribution of sensoryevokeddepolarization through existing cortical pathways after targeted stroke inmice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 11759-11764.
39. Neumann-Haefelin T, Witte OW. Periinfarct and remote excitability changes aftertransient middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20: 45-52. (Pubitemid 30019829)
40. Schmidt S, Bruehl C, Frahm C, Redecker C, Witte OW. Age dependence of excitatory-inhibitory balance following stroke. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33: 1356-1363.
41. Jones EG. The Thalamus. Plenum: New York, 1985.
42. Staines WR, Black SE, Graham SJ, McIlroy WE. Somatosensory gating and recoveryfrom stroke involving the thalamus. Stroke 2002; 33: 2642-2651. (Pubitemid 35266436)
43. Paz JT, Christian CA, Parada I, Prince DA, Huguenard Jr. Focal cortical infarcts alterintrinsic excitability and synaptic excitation in the reticular thalamic nucleus.J Neurosci 2010; 30: 5465-5479.
44. Romo R, Salinas E. Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory anddecision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 203-218. (Pubitemid 37280185)
45. Salinas E, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Romo R. Periodicity and firing rate as candidateneural codes for the frequency of vibrotactile stimuli. J Neurosci 2000; 20:5503-5515. (Pubitemid 30457747)
46. Meyer HS, Wimmer VC, Oberlaender M, de Kock CP, Sakmann B, Helmstaedter M.Number and laminar distribution of neurons in a thalamocortical projectioncolumn of rat vibrissal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 2277-2286.