Cross-flow microfiltration of fermentation broth containing native corn starch

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 427, Issue , 2013, Pages 118-128

  Wojciech, BiaŁas ^a   Celińska, Ewelina ^a   Dembczyński, RadosŁaw ^a   Szymanowska, Daria ^a   Nowacka, Magdalena ^b   Jesionowski, Teofil ^b   Grajek, WŁodzimierz ^a  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cross flow velocity; Microfiltration; Native corn starch; Transmembrane pressure

Indexed keywords

CAKE FORMATION; CORN STARCH; CROSSFLOW MICROFILTRATION; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; FERMENTATION BROTHS; FLUX DECLINE; FOULING MECHANISMS; FOULING PHENOMENA; MEMBRANE SURFACE; MICROFILTRATION SYSTEMS; PERMEATE FLUX RATE; PORE BLOCKAGES; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; SEM IMAGE; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; TUBULAR CERAMIC MEMBRANES;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES; FERMENTATION; FLOW VELOCITY; MEMBRANE FOULING; MICROFILTRATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STARCH;

WATER FILTRATION;

STARCH; WATER;

ARTICLE; FERMENTATION; FOULING CONTROL; MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VELOCITY;

EID: 84871819897     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.046     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Rosillo-Calle F., Walter A. Global market for bioethanol: historical trends and future prospects. Energy Sustainable Dev. 2006, 10(1):18-30.
2. Robertson G.H., Wong D.W.S., Lee C.C., Wagschal K., Smith M.R., Orts W.J. Native or raw starch digestion: a key step in energy efficient biorefining of grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54:353-365.
3. Vidal B.C., Rausch Kent D., Tumbleson M.E., Singh V. Kinetics of granular starch hydrolysis in corn dry-grind process. Starch-Stärke 2009, 8:448-456.
4. Robertson G.H., Wong D.W.S., Lee C.C., Wagschal K., Smith M.R., Orts M.R.W.J. Native or raw starch digestion: a key step in energy efficient biorefining of grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54:353-365.
5. Shetty J.K., Lantero O.J., Dunn-Coleman N. Technological advances in ethanol production. Int. Sugar J. 2005, 107:605-606.
6. Ding J., Huang X., Zhang L., Zhao N., Yang D., Zhan K. Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 2:253-263.
7. He Y., Bagley D.M., Leung K.T., Liss S.N., Liao B.-Q. Recent advances in membrane technologies for biorefining and bioenergy production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 4:817-858.
8. Groot W.J., Sikkenk C.M., Waldram R.H., Lans R.G.J.M., Luyben K. Ch.A.M. Kinetics of ethanol production by baker's yeast in an integrated process of fermentation and microfiltration. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 1992, 1-2:39-47.
9. Damiano D., Wang S.S. Novel use of a perfluorocarbon for supplying oxygen to aerobic submerged cultures. Biotechnol. Lett. 1985, 7:81-86.
10. Ben Chaabane F., Aldiguier A.S., Alfenore S., Cameleyre X., Blanc P., Bideaux C., Guillouet S.E., Roux G., Molina-Jouve C. Very high ethanol productivity in an innovative continuous two-stage bioreactor with cell recycle. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2006, 1:49-57.
11. Matsuura T. Synthetic Membranes and Membrane Separation Processes 1993, CRC Press.
12. Schmidt S.L., Myers M.D., Kelley S.S., McMillan J.D., Padukone N. Evaluation of PTMSP membranes in achieving enhanced ethanol removal from fermentations by pervaporation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1997, 63-65:469-482.
13. Chen Ch., Tang X., Xiao Z., Zhou Y., Jiang Y., Fu S. Extractive pervaporation to separate ethanol from its dilute aqueous solutions characteristic of ethanol-producing fermentation processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 1-2:119-129.
14. Thongsukmak A., Sirkar K.K. Poisoning of mixed matrix membranes by fermentation components in pervaporation of ethanol. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 329:288-295.
15. O'Brien D.J., Craig J.C. Ethanol production in a continuous fermentation/membrane pervaporation system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 44:699-704.
16. Haelssig J.B., Thibault J., Tremblay A.Y. Numerical investigation of membrane dephlegmation: a hybrid pervaporation-distillation process for ethanol recovery. Chem. Eng. Process. 2011, 11-12:1226-1236.
17. Lewandowicz G., BiaŁas W., Marczewski B., Szymanowska D. Application of membrane distillation for ethanol recovery during fuel ethanol production. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:212-219.
18. Gryta M. The fermentation process integrated with membrane distillation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 24:283-296.
19. Gryta M., Morawski A.W., Tomaszewska M. Ethanol production in membrane distillation bioreactor. Catal. Today 2000, 56:159-165.
20. Maiorella B., Blanch H.W., Wilke C.R. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25:103-121.
21. Miyazawa Kaseno I., Kokugan T. Effect of product removal by a pervaporation on ethanol fermentation. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998, 86(5):488-493.
22. BiaŁas W., Szymanowska D., Grajek W. Fuel ethanol production from granular corn starch using Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a long term repeated SSF process with full stillage recycling. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:3126-3131.
23. Mondal S., De S. A fouling model for steady state crossflow membrane filtration considering sequential intermediate pore blocking and cake formation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75:222-228.
24. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws application to power law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. IChemE 1982, 60:183-187.
25. Field R.W., Wu J.J. Modelling of permeability loss in membrane filtration: re-examination of fundamental fouling equations and their link to critical flux. Desalination 2011, 283:68-74.
26. Mattaraj S., Jarusutthirak Ch., Charoensuk Ch., Jiraratananon R. A combined pore blockage, osmotic pressure, and cake filtration model for crossflow nanofiltration of natural organic matter and inorganic salts. Desalination 2011, 274:182-191.
27. Sarkar B., De S. A combined complete pore blocking and cake filtration model for steady-state electric field-assisted ultrafiltration. AIChE J. 2012, 58:1435-1446.
28. Yuan W., Kocic A., Zydney A.L. Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using pore blockage-cake filtration model. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 198:51-62.
29. Ho C.C., Zydney A.L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 232:389-399.
30. Onderková B., Šchlosser Š., Blahušiak M., Búgel M. Microfiltration of suspensions of microparticulate boron adsorbent through a ceramic membrane. Desalination 2009, 241:148-155.
31. Ye Y., Le Clech P., Chen V., Fane A.G., Jefferson B. Fouling mechanisms of alginate solutions as model extracellular polymeric substances. Desalination 2005, 175:7-20.
32. Taniguchi M., Kilduff J.E., Belfort G. Modes of natural organic matter fouling during ultra filtration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:1676-1683.
33. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Sensibaugh J., Pieracci J.P., Yua Y., Belfort G. Modeling flux decline during nanofiltration of NOM with poly(arylsulfone) membranes modified using UV assisted graft polymerization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 19:477-495.
34. Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1964, 26:211-246.
35. Derringer G., Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J. Qual. Technol. 1980, 12:214-219.
36. Kelly S.T., Zydney A.L. Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:115-127.
37. Muthukumaran S., Kentish S.E., Ashokkumar M., Stevens G.W. Mechanisms for the ultrasonic enhancement of dairy whey ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:106-114.
38. Palacio L., Ho C.C., Zydney A.L. Application of a pore-blockage-cake-filtration model to protein fouling during microfiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 79:260-270.
39. Shukla R., Tandon R., Nguyen M., Cheryan M. Microfiltration of starch suspensions using a tubular stainless steel membrane. Membr. Technol. 2000, 120:5-8.
40. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, CRC Press. second ed.
41. Lending C.R., Larkins B.A. Changes in the zein composition of protein bodies during maize endosperm development. Plant Cell 1989, 1:1011-1023.
42. Su T.J., Lu J.R., Cui Z.F., Bellhouse B.J., Thomas R.K., Heenan R.K. Identification of the location of protein fouling on ceramic membranes under dynamic filtration conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 163:265-275.
43. Bowen R., Calvo J.I., Hermindez A. Steps of membrane blocking in flux decline during protein microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 101:153-165.
44. Li M., Zhao Y., Zhou S., Xing W., Wong F.-S. Resistance analysis for ceramic membrane microfiltration of raw soy sauce. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 299:122-129.
45. Jane J., Shen L., Wang L., Maningat C.C. Preparation and properties of small-particle com starch. Cereal Chem. 1992, 69(3):280-283.