A combined pore blockage, osmotic pressure, and cake filtration model for crossflow nanofiltration of natural organic matter and inorganic salts

Desalination

Volumn 274, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 182-191

  Mattaraj, Supatpong ^a   Jarusutthirak, Chalor ^b   Charoensuk, Chareopon ^a   Jiraratananon, Ratana ^c  

^a UBON RATCHATHANI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b KING MONGKUT'S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LADKRABANG   (Thailand)

^c KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cake filtration; Inorganic salt; Nanofiltration; Natural organic matter; Osmotic pressure; Pore blockage

Indexed keywords

CAKE FILTRATION; INORGANIC SALT; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PORE BLOCKAGE;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; IONIC STRENGTH; MEMBRANE FOULING; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER FILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

OSMOSIS;

FILTRATION; FOULING; INORGANIC SALT; MEMBRANE; MODELING; ORGANIC MATTER; OSMOSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 79955469902     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jacangelo J.G., Trussell R.R., Watson M. Role of membrane technology in drinking water treatment in the United States. Desalination 1997, 113:119-127.
2. de la Rubia A., Rodriguez M., Leon V.M., Prats D. Removal of natural organic matter and THM formation potential by ultra- and nanofiltration of surface. Water Res. 2008, 42:714-722.
3. Zularisam A.W., Ismail A.F., Salim R. Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment - a review. Desalination 2006, 194:211-231.
4. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 96:1-58.
5. Shirazi S., Lin C.-H., Chen D. Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes - a critical review. Desalination 2010, 250:236-248.
6. Her N., Amy G., Plottu-Pecheux A., Yoon Y. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants. Water Res. 2007, 41:3936-3947.
7. Tipping E. Cation binding by humic substances. Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series 1948, ISBN 0 521 62146 1.
8. Thurman E.M. Organic Geochemistry of Natural Waters 1985, Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
9. Taniguchi M., Kilduff J.E., Belfort G. Modes of natural organic matter fouling during ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:1676-1683.
10. Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:5043-5050.
11. Lin C.-F., Lin A.Y.-C., Chandana P.S., Tsai C.-Y. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline. Water Res. 2009, 43:389-394.
12. Jarusutthirak C., Mattaraj S., Jiraratananon R. Factors affecting nanofiltration performances in natural organic matter rejection and flux decline. Sep. Pur. Technol. 2007, 58:68-75.
13. 4 in nanofiltration. Water Res. 2006, 40:806-816.
14. 4 scale formation mechanism in various nanofiltration modules. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 163:63-74.
15. 3 scale formation and inhibition in RO and NF membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 296:171-184.
16. Saikaew W., Mattaraj S., Jiraratananon R. Nanofiltration performance of lead solutions: effects of solution pH and ionic strength. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 2010, 10(2):193-200.
17. Hong S., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 132:159-181.
18. Jarusutthirak C., Mattaraj S., Jiraratananon R. Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:138-145.
19. Mattaraj S., Jarusutthirak C., Jiraratananon R. A combined osmotic pressure and cake filtration model for crossflow nanofiltration of natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:475-483.
20. Mattaraj S., Phimpha W., Hongthong P., Jiraratananon R. Effect of operating conditions and solution chemistry on model parameters in crossflow reverse osmosis of natural organic matter. Desalination 2010, 253:38-45.
21. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Sensibaugh J., Pieracci J.P., Yuan Y., Belfort G. Modeling flux decline during nanofiltration of NOM with poly (arylsulfone) nanofiltration membranes modified using UV-Assisted graft polymerization. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19(6):477-496.
22. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100:259-272.
23. Zeman L.J., Zydney A.L. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications 1996, M. Dekker, New York.
24. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Belfort G. Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239(1):39-53.
25. Ho C.C., Zydney A.L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 232:389-399.
26. Yuan W., Kocic A., Zydney A.L. Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using a pore blockage-cake filtration model. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 198:51-62.
27. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Zhou M., Belfort G. Kinetics of membrane flux decline: the role of natural colloids and mitigation via membrane surface modification. J. Nanopart. Res. 2005, 7:525-544.
28. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 1998, Wiley Interscience, ISBN 0-471-17082-8. 3rd Edition.
29. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Wigton A., Kitis M., Karanfil T. Effects of reverse osmosis isolation on reactivity of naturally occurring dissolved organic matter in physicochemical processes. Water Res. 2004, 38(4):1026-1036.
30. Sawyer C.N., McCarty P.L., Parki G.F. Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science 2003, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA. 5th ed.
31. Braghetta A., DiGiano F.A., Ball W.P. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects. J. Environ. Eng., ASCE 1997, 123(7):628-641.
32. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:160-166.