Ultrasound guided breast biopsy -A retrospective study and literature review;Biopsija dojke pod kontrolom ultrazvuka retrospektivna studija I pregled literature

Lijecnicki Vjesnik

Volumn 134, Issue 9-10, 2012, Pages 270-275

  Prutki, Maja ^a   Štern Padovan, Ranka ^a   Jakić Razumović, Jasminka ^a   PotočKi, Kristina ^a   Badovinac Črnjević, Tanja ^a   Golubić, Anja Tea ^a  

^a KBC Zagreb   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast neoplasms Pathology; Mammary Methods; Needle Methods; Radiography; Sensitivity and specificity; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY;

BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84871764908     PISSN: 00243477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. O'Flynn EAM, Wilson ARM, Michell MJ. Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clin Radiol 2010;65:259-70.
2. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J i sur. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer 1998;82:679 - 88.
3. Zuiani C, Londero V, Del Frate C, Bazzocchi M. Biopsie citologiche. Atti SIRM. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004;107:48-52.
4. Di Loreto C, Puglisi F, Rimondi G i sur. Large core biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of invasive breast carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A: 1693-700.
5. Puglisi F, Scalone S, Bazzocchi M i sur. Image-guided core breast biopsy: A suitable method for preoperative biological characterization of small (pTl) breast carcinomas. Cancer Lett 1998;133:223-9.
6. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD i sur. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998;208:251-60.
7. Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R i sur. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of non-palpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 2004;90:595-600.
8. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). Reston, Va: © American College of Radiology; 2003.
9. NHS Non-operative Diagnosis Subgroup of the National Coordination Group for Breast Screening Pathology. Guidelines for Non-operative Diagnostic Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening. NHSBSP publication 50. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes; 2001, str. 32-45.
10. Tabar L, Vitak B, Hsiu-Hsi TC, i sur. Beyond randomized control trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001 ;91:1724-31.
11. Zuiani C, Mozzarella F, Londero V, Linda A, Puglisi F, Bazzocchi M. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results, follow-up and correlation with radiological suspicion. Radiol Med 2007; 112:304-17.
12. Crystal P, Koretz M, Scharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least 2-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2005;33:47-52.
13. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:967-72.
14. Guidelines for non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening, NHSBSP Publication 50. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes; 2001
15. HoussamiN, Ciatto S, Bilous M, Vezzosi V.BianchiS. Borderline breast core needle histology, predictive values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Br J Cancer 2007;96:1253-7.
16. Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Hill AD, O 'Doherty A, O 'Higgins N, Quinn CM. Predictive value of breast lesions of «uncertain malignant potential» and «suspicious for malignancy» determined by needle core biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:704-11.
17. Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: A correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:534-43.
18. Liberman L, Tornos C, Huzjan R, Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Is surgical excision warranted after benign, concordant diagnosis of papilloma at percutaneous breast biopsy? Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186:1328-34.
19. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC i sur. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1341-6.
20. Carder PJ, Liston JC. Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a «B3» breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate? J Clin Pathol 2003; 56:133-8.
21. Manfrin E, Mariotto R, Remo A i sur. Benign breast lesions at risk of developing cancer - a challenging problem in breast cancer screening programs: five years' experience of the Breast Cancer Screening Program in Verona (1999-2004). Cancer 2009; 115:499-507.
22. Shaaban AM, SloaneJP, West CR isur. Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer: case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:421-30.
23. Berg JC, Visscher DW, Vierkant RA i sur. Breast cancer risk in women with radial scars in benign breast biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;108:167-74.
24. O 'Driscoll D, Britton P, Bobrow L, Wishart GC, Sinnatamby R, Warren R. Lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy - what is the clinical significance? Clin Radiol 2001;56:216-20.
25. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD i sur. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208:717-23.
26. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE i sur. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001 ;20:43-9.
27. Buchberger W, NiehoffA, ObristP, Rettl G, DunserM. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast: Technique, accuracy and indications. Radiologe 2002;42:25.32.
28. Berg WA, BergAP, Loffe OB. Initial success and frequency of rebiopsy after ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:10.
29. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA i sur. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-11.
30. Maniero MB, Koelliker SL, Lazarus E, Schepps B, Lee CH. Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of the breast: frequency and results of repeat biopsy. J Women Imag 2002;4:52-7.
31. Lieske B, Ravichandran D, Wright D. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2006;95:62-6.
32. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ i sur. Percutaneous laige-core breast biopsy: A multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-64.
33. Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K i sur. Ultrasound guided large core needle biopsy of breast lesions: Analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples of reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 2005; 92:231-5.
34. Helbich TH, Mayr W, Schick S i sur. Co-axial technique: Approach to breast core biopsies. Radiology 1997:203:684-90.
35. ChoN, Moon WK, Cha JHi sur. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 2005;6: 102-9.
36. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM i sur. The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer with analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Suig 2005;242:701-7.
37. Memarsadeghi M, Pfari G, Riedl C i sur. Value of 14-gauge ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of breast lesions: own results in comparison with literature. Rofo 2003;175:374-80.
38. Schulz-Wendtland R, Kramer S, Lang N, Bautz W. Ultrasonic guided microbiopsy in mammary diagnosis: indications, technique and results. Anticancer Res 1998;18:2145-6.
39. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK. Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 2007;27:79-94.
40. Jackman RJ, Marzoni Jr FA. Needle-localised breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677-84.
41. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency for mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 1999; 212:189-94.
42. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CCi sur. Stereotactic 11 -gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: validation study. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1503-7.
43. Liberman L. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1191-99.
44. Doyle JM, O'Doherty A, Coffey L i sur. Can the radiologist accurately predict the adequacy of sampling when performing ultrasound-guided core biopsy of BI RADS category 4 and 5 lesions detected on screening mammography? Clin Radiol 2005;60:999-1005.
45. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E i sur. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: A meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1017-21.
46. Perry NM. Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. EU-SOMA Working Party. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:159-72.
47. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE i sur. Non-palpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated laige-core biopsies. Radiology 1991;180:403-7.
48. Edge S, RA O, EM L i sur. Surgical biopsy to diagnose breast cancer adversely affects outcomes of breast cancer care: Finding from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 8-11. prosinca, 2005; San Antonio.
49. Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Dershaw DD. Impact of core biopsy on the surgical management of impalpable breast cancer: Another look at margins. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1464-5.