A comparison of grades awarded by peer assessment, faculty and a digital scanning device in a pre-clinical operative skills course

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Taylor, C L ^a   Grey, N J A ^a   Satterthwaite, J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dental education; Objective evaluation; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER GROUP; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, DENTAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; PEER GROUP;

EID: 84871700711     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00752.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Topping K Peer assessment between students in Colleges and Universities. Rev Educ Res 1998: 68: 249-276.
2. Vargis A Principles of assessment: a primer for medical education in the clinical years. Int J Med Educ 2010: 1: 83-87.
3. Turnbull JGJ, MacFayden J Improving in-training evaluation programmes. J Gen Intern Med 1998: 13: 317-323.
4. Satterthwaite JD, Grey NJA Peer-group assessment of pre-clinical operative skills in restorative dentistry and comparison with experienced assessors. Eur J Dent Educ 2008: 12: 99-102.
5. Falchikov NGJ A meta- analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res 2000: 70: 287-322.
6. Helft M, Pilo R, Cardash HS, Baharav H Reliability of ratings in evaluation of crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1987: 58: 647-649.
7. Hinkelman KW, Long NK Method for decreasing subjective evaluation in preclinical restorative dentistry. J Dent Educ 1973: 37: 13-18.
8. Sharaf AA, AbdelAziz AM, El Meligy OA Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures. J Dent Educ 2007: 71: 540-544.
9. Vann WF, Machen JB, Hounshell PB Effects of criteria and checklists on reliability in preclinical evaluation. J Dent Educ 1983: 47: 671-675.
10. Goepferd SJKP A comparison of two methods for evaluating Class II cavity preparations. J Dent Educ 1980: 44: 537-541.
11. Natkin E, Guild RE Evaluation of preclinical laboratory performance: a systematic study. J Dent Educ 1967: 31: 152-161.
12. Houpt MI, Kress G Accuracy of measurement of clinical performance in dentistry. J Dent Educ 1973: 37: 34-46.
13. Kwan KPLR Tutor versus peer- group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise. Assess Eval High Educ 1996: 21: 205-214.
14. Heylings DJ, Stefani LA Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class. Med Educ 1997: 31: 281-286.
15. Van Rosendaal GM, Jennett PA Comparing peer and faculty evaluations in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med 1994: 69: 299-303.
16. Orsmond PMS, Reiling K The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assess Eval High Educ 1996: 21: 239-250.
17. Mast TA, Bethart H Evaluation of clinical dental procedures by senior dental students. J Dent Educ 1978: 42: 196-197.
18. Stefani L Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities. Stud High Educ 1994: 19: 69-75.
19. Evans AW, Leeson RMA, Petrie A Reliability of peer and self-assessment scores compared with trainers' scores following third molar surgery. Med Educ 2007: 41: 866-872.
20. English R, Brookes ST, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Ben-Shlomo Y The effectiveness and reliability of peer-marking in first-year medical students. Med Educ 2006: 40: 965-972.
21. Burnett AC, Linden GJ The reproducibility of the assessment of restorations by dental students and their teachers. J Dent Educ 1988: 52: 568-570.
22. Nick DRCM, Ordelheide C, Goodacre C, Kim J The ability of dental students and faculty to estimate the total occlusal convergence of prepared teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2009: 101: 7-12.
23. Schiff AJ, Salvendy G, Root CM, Ferguson GW, Cunningham PR Objective evaluation of quality in cavity preparations. J Dent Educ 1975: 39: 92-96.
24. Navigation I DentSim overview. Available from: http://www.denx.com/DentSim/overview.html. (Accessed 19 February 2012).
25. Konukseven EI, Önder ME, Mumcuoglu E, Kisnisci RS Development of a visio-haptic integrated dental training simulation system. J Dent Educ 2010: 74: 880-891.
26. KingsCollege. hapTEL enhancing learning through haptics. Available from: http://www.haptel.kcl.ac.uk/. (Accessed 20 Februar 2012).
27. Kournetas N, Jaeger B, Axmann D, et al.Assessing the reliability of a digital preparation assistant system used in dental education. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 1228-1234.
28. Cardoso JA, Barbosa C, Fernandes S, Silva CL, Pinho A Reducing subjectivity in the evaluation of pre-clinical dental preparations for fixed prosthodontics using the Kavo PrepAssistant. Eur J Dent Educ 2006: 10: 149-156.
29. Londis RKG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977: 33: 159-174.
30. Sim JWC The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005: 85: 159-174.
31. Lilley JD, ten Bruggen Cate HJ, Holloway PJ, Holt JK, Start KB Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry. Br Dent J 1968: 5: 194-197.
32. Salvendy G, Root C, Cunningham PR, et al.Skills analysis of cavity preparations: class 1 in mandibular right first molar. J Dent Educ 1973: 37: 11-18.
33. Gaines WBH, Rasmussen R Reliability of ratings in preclinical fixed prosthodontics: effect of objective scaling. J Dent Educ 1974: 38: 672-675.
34. Dhuru S Criterion-oriented grading system for preclinical operative dentistry laboratory course. J Dent Educ 1978: 42: 528-531.
35. Fuller J The effects of training and criterion models on interjudge reliability. J Dent Educ 1972: 36: 19-22.
36. Quinn FKP, Mc Donald A, Hussey D A pilot study comparing effectiveness of conventional training and virtual reality simulation on skills acquisition of junior dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2003: 7: 13-19.
37. Paskins ZKJ, Allen M, Macdougall C, Fraser I, Peile E Design, validation and dissemination of an undergraduate assessment tool using Sim Man in simulated medical emergencies. Med Teach 2010: 32: e12-e17.
38. Feil P An analysis of the reliability of a laboratory evaluation system. J Dent Educ 1982: 46: 489-493.
39. Orsmond PMS, Reiling K The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self- assessment. Assess Eval High Educ 2000: 25: 23-38.
40. Jasinevicius TR, Landers M, Nelson S, Urbankova A An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 1151-1162.
41. Suebnukarn S, Phatthanasathiankul N, Sombatweroje S, Rhienmora P, Haddawy P Process and outcome measures of expert/novice performance on a haptic virtual reality system. J Dent 2009: 37: 658-665.
42. Deranleau NJ, Feiker JH, Beck M Effect of percentage cut-off scores and scale point variation on preclinical project evaluation. J Dent Educ 1983: 47: 650-655.