Political polarization projection: Social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 84-100

  Van Boven, Leaf ^a   Judd, Charles M ^a   Sherman, David K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude extremity; Egocentrism; Polarization; Politics; Projection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEFENSE MECHANISM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; POLITICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; POLITICS; PROJECTION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84871700160     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028145     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem and social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
2. Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. (2004). Two egocentric sources of the decison to vote: The voter's illusion and the belief in personal relevance. Political Psychology, 25, 115-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x
3. Ames, D. (2004a). Inside the mind-reader's toolkit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340-353. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340
4. Ames, D. (2004b). Strategies for social inference: Projecting to the similar and stereotyping to the different attribute prevalence judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573-585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
5. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
6. Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
8. Bendor, J., Deirmier, D., & Ting, M. (2003). A behavioral model of turnout. The American Political Science Review, 97, 261-280. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000662
9. Bradley, B. (2008). The New American story. New York, NY: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
10. Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1972). Comment: The assessment of policy voting. American Political Science Review, 66, 450-458. doi:10.2307/1957788
11. Carter, J. (2010, October 26). Hardball With Chris Matthews.
12. Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006). Misperceptions in intergroup conflcit. Psychological Science, 17, 38-45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x
13. Chambers, J. R., & Malnyk, D. (2006). Why do I hate thee? Conflict misperceptions and intergroup mistrust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1295-1311. doi:10.1177/0146167206289979
14. Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219-231. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1503
15. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1982). Projection and the perceptoin of candidates. Western Political Quarterly, 35, 228-244. doi:10.2307/448017
16. Corneille, O., & Judd, C. M. (1999). Accentuation and sensitization effects in the categorization of multifaceted stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 927-941. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.927
17. Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections. The American Political Science Review, 83, 217-231.
18. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding others" and "assumed similarity."Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193. doi:10.1037/h0044919
19. Dawes, R. M., Singer, D., & Lemons, F. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 281-295. doi:10.1037/h0032322
20. Downing, J. M., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (1992). Effects of repeated expressions on attitude extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 17-29. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.17
21. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
22. Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2009). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498-541). New York, NY: Wiley.
23. Fenigstein, A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Self-attention and the egocentric assumption of shared perspectives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 287-303. doi:10.1006/jesp.1993.1013
24. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pople, J. C. (2010). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
25. Gilovich, T. (1990). Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 623- 634. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.623
26. Goldman, A. I. (1992). In defense of the simulation theory. Mind & Language, 7, 104-119. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00200.x
27. Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1-14. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00028636
28. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1994). The theory theory. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257-293). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752902.011
29. Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 319-359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Hebb, D. O. (1946). Emotion in man and animal: An analysis of the intuitive processes of recognition. Psychological Review, 53, 88-106. doi:10.1037/h0063033
31. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1037/10628-000
32. Huber, M., Van Boven, L., Park, B., Teixeira, C. P., & Pizzi, W. (2012). Seeing red: Anger exacerbates in-group protectionism in politically significant national tragedies. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado Boulder.
33. Ichheiser, D. (1946). Projection as another form of false social perception. American Psychologist, 1, 258.
34. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862-879. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
35. Judd, C. M., & Johnson, J. T. (1981). Attitudes, polarization, and diagnosticity: Exploring the effect of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 26-36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.26
36. Judd, C. M., Van Boven, L., Huber, M., & Nunes, A. (2012). Measuring everyday perceptions of the distribution of the American Electorate. In J. H. Aldrich & K. McGraw (Eds.), Improving public opinion surveys: Interdisciplinary innovation and the American Natioal Election Studies (pp. 195-219). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Karniol, R. (2003). Egocentrism versus protocentrism: The status of the self in social prediction. Psychological Review, 110, 564-580. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.564
38. Katz, C., & Allport, F. (1931). Students' attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman Press.
39. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91. doi:10.1037/h0029849
40. Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1993). Imagined ideological differences in conflict escalation and resolution. International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 249-262. doi:10.1108/eb022728
41. Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196-210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196
42. Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 163-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Krueger, J., & Zeiger, J. S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670-680. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.670
44. Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 915-929. doi:10.2307/2669332
45. Mackie, D. M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720 -728. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.720
46. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72
47. Mullen, B., Dovidio, J. F., Johnson, C., & Copper, C. (1992). In-groupout-group differences in social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 422-440. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90040-Q
48. Nisbett, R. E., & Kunda, Z. (1985). Perception of social distributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 297-311. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.297
49. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
50. Page, B. I., & Brody, R. A. (1972). Policy voting and the electoral process: The Vietnam War issue. American Political Science Review, 66, 979-995. doi:10.2307/1957489
51. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 161-209). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111, 781-799. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
53. Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369-381. doi:10.1177/0146167202286008
54. Pronin, E., Puccio, C., & Ross, L. (2002). Understanding misunderstanding: Social psychological perspectives. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 636-665). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55. Quattrone, G. A., & Jones, E. E. (1980). The perception of variabiltiy within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141-152. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.141
56. Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1984). Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self-deception and on the voter's illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 237-248. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.237
57. Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25-42. doi:10.2307/1953324
58. Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: "Naive realism" in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404-417. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.404
59. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false-consensus effect:" An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279 -301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
60. Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 255-304). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61. Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Rutchick, A. M., Smyth, J. M., & Konrath, S. (2009). Seeing red (and blue): Effects of electoral college depictions on political group perception. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 269-282. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01183.x
63. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93-105. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
64. Seyle, D. C., & Newman, M. L. (2006). A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America. American Psychologist, 61, 571-580. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.571
65. Shamir, J., & Shamir, M. (1997). Pluralistic ignorance across issues and over time: Information cues and biases. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 227-260. doi:10.1086/297794
66. Sherif, M., & Hovland, D. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67. Sherman, D. K., Hogg, M. A., & Maitner, A. T. (2009). Perceived polarization: Reconciling ingroup and intergroup perceptions under uncertainty. Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations, 12, 95-109. doi:10.1177/1368430208098779
68. Sherman, D. K., Nelson, L. D., & Ross, L. D. (2003). Naive realism and affirmative action: Adversaries are more similar than they think. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 275-289. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2504_2
69. Sidanius, J. (1985). Cognitive functioning and sociopolitical ideology revisited. Political Psychology, 6, 637-661. doi:10.2307/3791021
70. Sidanius, J. (1988). Political sophistication and political deviance: A structural equation examination of context theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 37-51. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.37
71. Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29, 29 -54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x
72. Spears, R., Eiser, J. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1989). Attitude strength and perceived prevalence of attitude positions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 43-55. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1001_5
73. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
74. Stich, S., & Nichols, S. (1992). Folk psychology: Simulation or tacit theory? Mind and Language, 7, 35-71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00196.x
75. Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative judgement in social perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 16 -29. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1959.tb00677.x
76. Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classificaton and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54,101-114. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00865.x
77. Tesser, A., & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340-356. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-X
78. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819
79. Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D., & Peterson, R. S. (1994). The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 115-126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.115
80. Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psycholgical Bulletin, 108, 515-532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
81. Thompson, L. (1995). They saw a negotiation: Partisanship and involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 839-853. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.839
82. Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98-123. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-E
83. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P., Recher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
84. Van Boven, L. (2000). Pluralistic ignorance and political correctness: The case of affirmative action. Political Psychology, 21, 267-276. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00187
85. Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 66-76. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.66
86. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159-1168. doi:10.1177/0146167203254597
87. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2005a). Cross-situational projection. In M. D. Alicke, D. Dunning, & J. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social perception (pp. 43-64). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
88. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2005b). Empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. In B. Malle & S. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds (pp. 284-297). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
89. Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., & Dunning, D. (2005). The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 130-141. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.12.001
90. Van Boven, L., White, K., Kamada, A., & Gilovich, T. (2003). Intuitions about situational correction in self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 249-258. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.249
91. van der Plight, J., Ester, P., & van der Linden, J. (1983). Attitude extremity, consensus and informativeness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 187-191.
92. Westfall, J., Chambers, J. R., & Van Boven, L. (2012). Perceiving polarization in the American electorate. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado Boulder.