Assessing environmental impacts of biofuels using lifecycle-based approaches

Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 34-52

  Curran, Mary Ann ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon management; Environmental management; Environmental regulations; Fuels; Greenhouse gas; Life cycle assessment; Lifecycle; Material flow analysis; Materials management; Risk management; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871509285     PISSN: 14777835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14777831311291122     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. BRD (2008a), National Biofuels Action Plan, Biomass Research and Development Initiative (BR&Di).
2. BRD (2008b), Sustainability Interagency Working Group - Draft Status Report on Using Criteria and Indicators for Assessing the Sustainable Production of Biofuels, Biomass Research and Development Board.
3. British Standards Institute (2008), PAS 2050:2008: Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services, Carbon Trust and DEFRA, London.
4. CEN (2011), "Sustainability criteria for the production of biofuels and bioliquids for energy applications - part 4: calculation methods of the greenhouse gas emission balance using a life cycle analysis (under approval)", TC 383, CEN.
5. CML (2009), "Tools: material intensity analysis (MAIA)", Leiden University Institute of Environmental Sciences, available at: http://cml.leiden.edu/research/industrialecology/researchprojects/finished/chainet.html#tools.
6. Curran, M.A. (2007), "Co-product and input allocation approaches for creating life cycle inventory data: a literature review" in Int J LCA, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 65-78.
7. Curran, M.A. and Huisingh, D. (2010), "Promoting the use of life cycle assessment for a sustainable agri-food industry", VII International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector, Bari.
8. Dale, B. (2008), "Biofuels: thinking clearly about the issues" in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 56, pp. 3885-91.
9. Davis, J.M. and Thomas, V.M. (2006), "Systematic approach to evaluating trade-offs among fuel options: the lessons of MTBE" in Annals New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1076, pp. 498-515.
10. Delucchi, M. (2010), "Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use and land use" in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Issue: The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology, Vol. 1195, pp. 28-45.
11. Dewulf, J. and Van Langenhove, H. (2005), "Exergy-based efficiency and renewability assessment of biofuel production" in Environ. Sci. Technol, Vol. 39, pp. 3878-82.
12. Dewulf, J. and van Langehove, H. (2008), "Exergy: it's potential and limitations in environmental science and technology" in Environ. Sci. Technol, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 2221-32.
13. Dikeman, N. (2008), "Is ethanol's carbon footprint bad? It depends", GreenTech 2008.
14. Doornbusch, R. and Steenblik, R. (2007), Biofuels: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?, SG/SD/RT(2007)3, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
15. ED-DuPont (2007), "Nano risk framework, Environmental Defense-DuPont Nano partnership".
16. EPA (2006), Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, EPA/600/R-06/060, US Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research & Development.
17. EPA (2009), Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Renewable Fuels, Technical Highlights EPA-420-F-09-024, US Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
18. EPA (2011), Guidance to Facilitate Decisions for Sustainable Nanotechnology, EPA/600/R-11/107, US Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, OH.
19. European Commission (2010), "Product carbon footprinting - a study on methodologies and initiatives", European Commission, DG Environment: 307.
20. Finnish Association for Nature Conservation (FANC) (2011), "The eco-efficiency of grocery bags", available at: www.sll.fi/luontojaymparisto/kestava/mips-online-in-english/mips-figures/grocery-bags.
21. FAO/WHO (2009), "Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food: annex 1 glossary of terms", International Program on Chemical Safety, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.
22. Farrell, A. and Plevin, R.J. (2006), "Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals" in Science, Vol. 311, pp. 506-8.
23. Fava, J. and Denison, R. (1990), A technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
24. Finnveden, G. and Hauschild, M.Z. (2009), "Recent developments in life cycle assessment" in Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 91, pp. 1-21.
25. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W. (2008), Farmland Preservation and Ecological Footprints: A Critique, University of Southern California.
26. Hill, J. and Nelson, E. (2006), "Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels" in PNAS, Vol. 103, No. 30, pp. 11206-10.
27. International Standards Organization (ISO) (2006), Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework, ISO 14040, ISO, Brussels.
28. International Standards Organization (ISO) (2011a), Carbon Footprint of Products - Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification and Communication, ISO/DIS 14067, ISO, Brussels.
29. International Standards Organization (ISO) (2011b), Sustainability Criteria for Bioenergy, ISO/WD 13065, ISO, Brussels.
30. Johnson, E. and Heinen, R. (2008), "Carbon footprints of biofuels & petrofuels" in Industrial Biotechnology, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 257-61.
31. Joshi, S. and Lave, L. (2000), "A life cycle comparison of alternative transportation fuels, 2000-01-1516", SAE Proceedings of the 2000 Total Life Cycle Conference: Land, Sea & Mobility.
32. JRC (2010), ILCD Handbook: General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed Guidance, European Commission.
33. Lautier, A. and Rosenbaum, R.K. (2010), "Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors" in Sci Total Environ, Vol. 409, No. 1, pp. 33-42.
34. Miller, S.A. and Landis, A.E. (2007), "Environmental trade-offs of biobased production" in Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 41, No. 15, pp. 5176-82.
35. Petrou, E.C. and Pappis, C.P. (2009), "Biofuels: a survey on pros and cons" in Energy Fuels, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 1055-66.
36. Pimentel, D. (2003), "Ethanol fuels: energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative" in Natural Resources Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 127-34.
37. Raghu, S. and Anderson, R.C. (2006), "Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire?" in Science, Vol. 313, p. 1742.
38. Ritthoff, M. and Rohn, H. (2002), Calculating MIPS: Resource Productivity of Products and Services, Wuppertal Institute, North Rhine-Westphalia.
39. Rogers, K. and Seager, T. (2009), "Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels" in ES&T, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1718-23.
40. Rogich, D. and Cassara, A. (2008), Material Flows in the United States: A Physical Accounting of the US Industrial Economy, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
41. Rosen, M.A. (2009), "Energy sustainability: a pragmatic approach and illustrations" in Sustainability, Vol. 1, pp. 5-80.
42. Rosen, M.A. and Bulucea, C.A. (2009), "Using exergy to understand and improve the efficiency of electrical power technologies" in Entropy, Vol. 11, pp. 820-35.
43. Rosen, M.A. and Dincer, I. (2001), "Exergy as the confluence of energy, environment and sustainable development" in Exergy, An International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-13.
44. Scharlemann, J. and Laurance, W. (2008), "How green are biofuels?" in Science, Vol. 319, January, pp. 43-4.
45. Seager, T.P. and Theis, T.L. (2003), "A thermodynamic basis for evaluating environmental policy trade-offs" in Clean Techn Environ Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 217-26.
46. Sikdar, S. (2003), "Sustainable development and sustainability metrics" in AIChE Journal, Vol. 49, No. 8, pp. 1928-32.
47. Som, C. and Berges, M. (2010), "The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts" in Toxicology, Vol. 269, pp. 160-9.
48. Sweet, L. and Strohm, B. (2006), "Nanotechnology-life-cycle risk management" in Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 12, pp. 528-51.
49. UNEP/SETAC (2011), Global Guidance Principles for Life Cycle Assessment Databases: A Basis for Greener Processes and Products, United Nations Environment Programme, Paris.
50. USDA (2002), "The energy balance of corn ethanol: an update", Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Washington, DC, Agricultural Economic Report No. 813.
51. von Blottnitz, H. and Curran, M.A. (2007), "A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective" in Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 607-19.
52. Vos, J. (2007), The Ecological Footprint of Biofuels, Sustainability Planning Partners, Mill Valley, CA.
53. Wackernagel, M. (1994), "Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability", School of Community and Regional Planning, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, PhD thesis.
54. Wang, M. and Saricks, C. (1999), Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, ANL/ESD-38, Argonne.
55. Wernick, I. and Irwin, F. (2005), Material Flows Accounts: A Tool for Making Environmental Policy, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
56. Wiedmann, T. and Minx, J. (2007), "A definition of 'Carbon Footprint'", ISAUK, ISAUK Research Report No. 07-01.
57. WRI/WBCSD (2011), "Greenhouse gas protocol: product life cycle accounting and reporting standard".
58. Zamagni, A. and Buttol, P. (2009), "D20 blue paper on life cycle sustainability analysis", Project No. 037075, Co-Ordination Action for Innovation in Life-Cycle Analysis for Sustainability (CALCAS), EC within the SFP (2002-2006).
59. Zhang, Y. and Baral, A. (2010), "Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part II: toward an ecologically based LCA" in Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 44, pp. 2624-31.