Au-nanoparticle coated mesoporous silica nanocapsule-based multifunctional platform for ultrasound mediated imaging, cytoclasis and tumor ablation

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2057-2068

  Wang, Xia ^a   Chen, Hangrong ^a   Zheng, Yuanyi ^b   Ma, Ming ^a   Chen, Yu ^a   Zhang, Kun ^a   Zeng, Deping ^c   Shi, Jianlin ^a  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS   (China)

^b THE SECOND AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF CHONGQING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CHONGQING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Au nanoparticles; Enhancement agents; High intensity focused ultrasound; Imaging agents; Mesoporous silica nanocapsules

Indexed keywords

AU NANOPARTICLE; BUBBLE CAVITATION; CONTRAST INTENSIFICATION; ENERGY ACCUMULATION; EX-VIVO; HIFU THERAPY; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HIGH THERMAL; IMAGING AGENT; IN-VIVO; MESOPOROUS SILICA; MODEL DRUGS; SURGICAL THERAPY; TRIGGERED RELEASE; TUMOR ABLATION; ULTRASOUND IMAGING;

ABLATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; NANOCAPSULES; NANOPARTICLES; TUMORS; ULTRASONIC TESTING; ULTRASONICS;

GOLD;

GOLD NANOPARTICLE; MESOPOROUS SILICA NANOCAPSULE; NANOCAPSULE; PERFLEXANE; SILICON DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; B SCAN; CANCER SURGERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOCLASIS; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; DRUG COATING; DRUG SYNTHESIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ENCAPSULATION; EX VIVO STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; IN VIVO STUDY; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR ABLATION; TUMOR XENOGRAFT;

ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FLUOROCARBONS; GOLD; HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND ABLATION; INJECTIONS, SUBCUTANEOUS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICE; NANOCAPSULES; NEOPLASMS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POROSITY; RABBITS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TEMPERATURE; XENOGRAFT MODEL ANTITUMOR ASSAYS;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 84871490585     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.044     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kennedy J.E. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumors. Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5(4):321-327.
2. Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008, 60(10):1193-1208.
3. Xu G., Luo G., He L., Li J., Shan H., Zhang R., et al. Follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37(12):1993-1999.
4. Yu T., Hu D., Xu C. Microbubbles improve the ablation efficiency of extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound against kidney tissues. World J Urol 2008, 26(6):631-636.
5. Yu T., Wang G., Hu K., Ma P., Bai J., Wang Z. A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study. Urol Res 2004, 32(1):14-19.
6. Kaneko Y., Maruyama T., Takegami K., Watanabe T., Mitsui H., Hanajiri K., et al. Use of a microbubble agent to increase the effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on liver tissue. Eur Radiol 2005, 15(7):1415-1420.
7. Rouffiac V., Duret J., Peronneau P., Dehez N., Opolon P., Roche A., et al. Combination of HIFU therapy with contrast-enhanced sonography for quantitative assessment of therapeutic efficiency on tumor grafted mice. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32(5):729-740.
8. Jiang Y., Tian X., Luo W., Zhou X.D. Transmission electron microscopy of rabbit liver after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with ultrasound contrast agents. Adv Ther 2007, 24(4):700-705.
9. Chen W.S., Lafon C., Matula T.J., Vaezy S., Crum L.A. Mechanisms of lesion formation in high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Acoust Res Lett Onl 2003, 4(2):41-46.
10. Zhang P., Porter T. An in vitro study of a phase-shift nanoemulsion: a potential nucleation agent for bubble-enhanced HIFU tumor ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010, 36:1856-1866.
11. Stride E., Pancholi K., Edirisinghe M.J., Samarasinghe S. Increasing the nonlinear character of microbubble oscillations at low acoustic pressures. J R Soc Interface 2008, 5(24):807-811.
12. Gao Z., Kennedy A.M., Christensen D.A., Rapoport N.Y. Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy. Ultrasonics 2008, 48:260-270.
13. Ferrara K.W., Borden M.A., Zhang H. Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. Acc Chem Res 2009, 42:881-892.
14. de Smet M., Heijman E., Langereis S., Hijnen N.M., Grüll H. Magnetic resonance imaging of high intensity focused ultrasound mediated drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes: an in vivo proof-of-concept study. J Control Release 2011, 150:102-110.
15. Liu H.L., Hua M.Y., Yang H.W., Huang C.Y., Chu P.C., Wu J.S., et al. Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:15205-15210.
16. Rapoport N.Y., Kennedy A.M., Shea J.E., Scaife C.L., Nam K.H. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J Control Release 2009, 138:268-276.
17. Fabiilli M.L., Haworth K.J., Fakhri N.H., Kripfgans O.D., Carson P.L., Fowlkes J.B. The role of inertial cavitation in acoustic droplet vaporization. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009, 56:1006-1017.
18. Lo A.H., Kripfgans O.D., Carson P.L., Fowlkes J.B. Spatial control of gas bubbles and their effects on acoustic fields. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32:95-106.
19. Stride E.P., Coussios C.C. Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010, 224:171-191.
20. Ke H., Xing Z., Zhao B., Wang J., Liu J., Guo C., et al. Quantum-dot-modified microbubbles with bi-mode imaging capabilities. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:425105.
21. Sun Y., Zheng Y.Y., Ran H.T., Zhou Y., Shen H.X., Chen Y., et al. Superparamagnetic PLGA-iron oxide microcapsules for dual-modality US/MR imaging and high intensity focused US breast cancer ablation. Biomaterials 2012, 33:5854-5864.
22. Yang F., Li Y., Chen Z., Zhang Y., Wu J., Gu N. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Biomaterials 2009, 30(23-24):3882-3890.
23. Wang C.H., Kang S.T., Lee Y.H., Luo Y.L., Huang Y.F., Yeh C.K. Aptamer-conjugated and drug-loaded acoustic droplets for ultrasound theranosis. Biomaterials 2012, 33:1939-1947.
24. Xu J.S., Huang J., Qin R., Hinkle G.H., Povoski S.P., Martin E.W., et al. Synthesizing and binding dual-mode poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanobubbles for cancer targeting and imaging. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1716-1722.
25. Vlaskou D., Mykhaylyk O., Krötz F., Hellwig N., Renner R., Schillinger U., et al. Magnetic and acoustically active lipospheres for magnetically targeted nucleic acid delivery. Adv Funct Mater 2010, 20:3881-3894.
26. Wang X., Chen H.R., Chen Y., Ma M., Zhang K., Li F.Q., et al. Perfluorohexane-encapsulated mesoporous silica nanocapsules as enhancement agents for highly efficient high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Adv Mater 2012, 24(6):785-791.
27. Chen Y., Chen H., Sun Y., Zheng Y., Zeng D., Li F., et al. Multifunctional mesoporous composite nanocapsules for highly efficient MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound cancer surgery. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011, 50(52):12505-12509.
28. McDannold N., Hynynen K. Quality assurance and system stability of a clinical MRI-guided focused ultrasound system: four-year experience. Med Phys 2006, 33(11):4307-4313.
29. Wood B.J., Yanof J., Frenkel V., Viswanathan A., Dromi S., Oh K., et al. CT and ultrasound guided stereotactic high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). AIP Conf Proc 2006, 829:122-126.
30. Liu J., Levine A.L., Mattoon J.S., Yamaguchi M., Lee R.J., Pan X., et al. Nanoparticles as image enhancing agents for ultrasonography. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(9):2179-2189.
31. Yang F., Li L., Li Y., Chen Z., Wu J., Gu N. Superparamagnetic nanoparticle-inclusion microbubbles for ultrasound contrast agents. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53(21):6129-6141.
32. Park J.I., Jagadeesan D., Williams R., Oakden W., Chung S.Y., Stanisz G.J., et al. Microbubbles loaded with nanoparticles: a route to multiple imaging modalities. ACS Nano 2010, 4(11):6579-6586.
33. Visaria R.K., Griffin R.J., Williams B.W., Ebbini E.S., Paciotti G.F., Song C.W., et al. Enhancement of tumor thermal therapy using gold nanoparticle-assisted tumor necrosis factor-alpha delivery. Mol Cancer Ther 2006, 5(4):1014-1020.
34. Liu C.H., Li B.Q., Mi C.C. Fast transient thermal analysis of gold nanoparticles in tissue-like medium. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2009, 8(3):271-280.
35. Chen Y., Chen H.R., Zeng D.P., Tian Y.B., Chen F., Feng J.W., et al. Core/shell structured hollow mesoporous nanocapsules: a potential platform for simultaneous cell imaging and anticancer drug delivery. ACS Nano 2010, 4(10):6001-6013.
36. Chen Y., Chen H.R., Guo L.M., He Q.J., Chen F., Zhou J., et al. Hollow/rattle-type mesoporous nanostructures by a structural difference-based selective etching strategy. ACS Nano 2010, 4(1):529-539.
37. 4 corehybridAu shell nanocomposite for bimodal imaging and photothermal therapy. Adv Mater 2011, 23(45):5392-5397.
38. Wang C.Y., Yang C.H., Lin Y.S., Chen C.H., Huang K.S. Anti-inflammatory effect with high intensity focused ultrasound-mediated pulsatile delivery of diclofenac. Biomaterials 2012, 33(5):1547-1553.
39. Hu M., Hartland G.V. Heat dissipation for Au particles in aqueous solution: relaxation time versus size. J Phys Chem B 2002, 106(28):7029-7033.
40. Link S., Burda C., Wang Z.L., El-Sayed M.A. Electron dynamics in gold and gold-silver alloy nanoparticles: the influence of a nonequilibrium electron distribution and the size dependence of the electron-phonon relaxation. J Chem Phys 1999, 111(3):1255-1264.
41. Ferrara K. Driving delivery vehicles with ultrasound. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008, 60(10):1097-1102.
42. Kim A.Y., Choi B.I., Kim T.K., Han J.K., Yun E.J., Lee K.Y., et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: power doppler US with a contrast agent - preliminary results. Radiology 1998, 209:135-140.
43. Lopez-Ben R., Robbin M.L., Weber T.M., Smith J.K., Needleman L., Berland L.L. Doppler sonographic enhancement of hepatic hemangiomas and hepatocellular carcinomas after perflenapent emulsion: preliminary study. J Ultras Med 1999, 18:109-116.
44. Kim T.K., Choi B.I., Han J.K., Hong H.S., Park S.H., Moon S.G. Hepatic tumors: contrast agent-enhancement patterns with pulse-inversion harmonic US. Radiology 2000, 216:411-417.
45. Terhaar G., Rivens I., Chen L., Riddler S. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of rat-tumors. Phys Med Biol 1991, 36(11):1495-1501.
46. Taylor L.S., Porter B.C., Rubens D.J., Parker K.J. Three-dimensional sonoelastography: principles and practices. Phys Med Biol 2000, 45:1477-1494.
47. Lotz T., Simpson P.D., Stocker D., Hann C.E., Chase J.G. In vitro evaluation of surface based non-invasive breast cancer screening with digital image based elasto tomography (DIET). IEEE Eng Med Bio 2010, 3077-3080.