Effect of the mixture preparation on the nanoparticle characteristics of gasoline direct-injection vehicles

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering

Volumn 226, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1514-1524

  Choi, Kwanhee ^a   Kim, Juwon ^a   Myung, Cha Lee ^a   Lee, Minho ^b   Kwon, Sangil ^c   Lee, Youngjae ^d   Park, Simsoo ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Petroleum Management   (South Korea)

^c National Institute of Environmental Research   (South Korea)

^d Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

condensation particle counter; differential mobility spectrometer; Gasoline direct injection; mixture preparation; nanoparticle; solid particle number

Indexed keywords

ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EXHAUST SYSTEMS (ENGINE); GASOLINE; MIXTURES; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); SPECTROMETERS; VEHICLES;

CONDENSATION PARTICLE COUNTERS; DIFFERENTIAL MOBILITY SPECTROMETERS; GASOLINE DIRECT INJECTION; MIXTURE PREPARATIONS; SOLID PARTICLES;

DIRECT INJECTION;

EID: 84871432466     PISSN: 09544070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954407012445534     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Zhao F, Lai MC, Harrington DL. Automotive spark-ignited direct-injection gasoline engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 1999 ; 25 (5). 437-562
2. Van Basshuysen R, Spicher U Gasoline engine with direct injection: processes, systems, development, potential. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner ; 2009 :
3. Sturgess J, Hill B, Samuel S. Experimental investigation into particulate size and number distribution from a spark ignition engine: in-cylinder combustion and transient events. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering. 2008 ; 222 (6). 1065-1075
4. Kayes D, Hochgeb S. Mechanism of PM formation in spark-ignition engines: effect of engine operating conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 2004 ; 33: 3957-3967
5. Myung CL, Park S. Exhaust nanoparticle emissions frim internal combustion engines: a review. Int J Automot Technol. 2012 ; 13 (1). 9-22
6. Myung CL, Kim J, Choi K, et al. Comparative study of engine control strategies for particulate emissions from direct injection light-duty vehicle fueled with gasoline and liquid phase liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Fuel. 2012 ; 94 (4). 348-335
7. JoshiAChatterjeeSWalkerA. An evaluation of particle size distributions and particle number-based reductions from various PM emission control technologies. SAE paper 2011-01-0600, 2011.
8. Kim YJ, Kim KB, Lee KH. Effect of a 2-stage injection strategy on the combustion and flame characteristics in a PCCI engine. Int J Automot Technol. 2011 ; 12 (5). 639-644
9. Kim S, Nouri JM, Yan Y, Arcoumanis C. Effects of intake flow on the spray structure of a multi-hole injector in a DISI engine. Int J Automot Technol. 2009 ; 10 (3). 277-284
10. Lee CH, Lee KH, Lim KB. Effects of injection parameters on the spray characteristics of swirl and slit injectors using the Mie-scattering method. Int J Automot Technol. 2010 ; 11 (3). 435-440
11. UchimayaMFraidelGKapusP. Solutions for EU6 particulate number in gasoline DI engines. JSAE paper 20115251, 2011.
12. Kittelson DB. Engines and nanoparticles: a review. J Aerosol Science. 1998 ; 29 (5-6). 575-588
13. Mikulic I, Koelman H, Majkowski S, Vosejpka P. A study about particle filter application on a state-of-the-art homogeneous turbocharged 2L DI gasoline engine. 19th Aachen colloquium on automobile and engine technology, Aachen, Germany, 4-6 October 2010, paper 299-51813/11-10. Aachen: Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen Aachen
14. Lee H, Myung CL, Park S. Time-resolved particle emission and size distribution characteristics during dynamic engine operation conditions with ethanol-blended fuels. Fuel. 2009 ; 88 (9). 1680-1686
15. Lee JW, Jeong YI, Jung MW, et al. Experimental investigation and comparison of nano-particle emission characteristics in light-duty vehicles for two different fuels. Int J Automot Technol. 2008 ; 9 (4). 397-403
16. Myung CL, Lee H, Choi K, et al. Effects of gasoline, diesel, LPG, and low-carbon fuels and various certification modes on nanoparticle emission characteristics in light-duty vehicles. Int J Automot Technol. 2009 ; 10 (5). 537-544
17. Zhang S, McMahon W. Particulate emissions and size distributions for California LEV II certified gasoline direct injection vehicles. CRC mobile source air toxics workshopSacramento, California, USA, 30 November-2 December 2010. Alpharetta, GA: Coordinating Research Council
18. Preliminary discussion paper - amendments to Californias low-emission vehicle regulations for criteria pollutants - LEV III. Report, California Air Resources Board, El Mont, CA, USA, 2010.
19. Myung CL, Choi KH, Hwang IG, et al. Effects of valve timing and intake flow motion control on combustion and time-resolved HC and NOx formation characteristics. Int J Automot Technol. 2009 ; 10 (2). 161-166
20. Ohm IY, Park CJ. Effect of fuel stratification on initial flame development: Part 3 - high swirl condition. Int J Automot Technol. 2011 ; 12 (5). 653-660
21. Price P, Twiney B, Stone R, et al. Particulate and hydrocarbon emissions from a spray guided direct injection spark ignition engine with oxygenate fuel blends. SAE paper 2007-01-0472, 2007.
22. Anderson J, Giechaskeiel B, Munoz-Bueno R, et al. Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) light-duty Inter-Laboratory Correlation Exercise (ILCE-LD) final report. Report EUR 24561 EN, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy, 2007.
23. Ayala A, Zhang S, Collins J, et al. Californias informal participation in the Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) light duty Inter-Laboratory Correlation Exercise (ILCE-LD). Final research report, California Air Resources Board, El Mont, CA, USA, 2008.
24. PeckhamMSFinchACampbellB. Study of particle number emissions from a turbocharged gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine including data from a fast-response particle size spectrometer. SAE paper 2011-01-1224, 2011.
25. Lee K, Lee C. An experimental study on the spray behavior and fuel distribution of GDI injectors using the entropy analysis and PIV method. Fuel. 2004 ; 83: 971-980
26. PricePStoneRCollierTDaviesM. Particulate matter and hydrocarbon emissions measurements: comparing first and second generation DISI with PFI in single cylinder optical engines. SAE paper 2006-01-1263, 2006.
27. Shimizu M, Yageta K, Matsui Y, Yoshida T. Development of new 1.6 liter four cylinder turbocharged direct injection gasoline engine with intake and exhaust valve timing control system. SAE paper 2011-01-0419, 2011
28. YamakawaMYousoTFujikawaT. Combustion technology development for a high compression ratio gasoline engine. JSAE paper 20115067, 2011.
29. LohfinkCBaeckerHTichyM. Experimental investigation on catalyst-heating strategies and potential of GDI combustion systems. SAE paper 2008-01-2517, 2008.
30. PiockWHoffmannGBerndorferA. Strategies towards meeting future particulate matter emission requirements in homogeneous gasoline direct injection engines. SAE paper 2011-01-1212, 2011.
31. SabathilDKoenigsteinASchaffnerP. The influence of DISI engine operating parameters on particle number emissions. SAE paper 2011-01-0143, 2011.
32. Kunde O, Hansen J, Zenner T, et al. The new 2.0 SCTi EcoBoost gasoline engine from Ford. 19th Aachen colloquium on automobile and engine technology, Aachen, Germany, 4-6 October 2010, pp.1043-1067. Aachen: Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen Aachen.
33. Eastwood P Particulate emissions from vehicles. New York: John Wiley ; 2008 :
34. SogawaYHattoriHYamashitaT. Nano particle emission evaluation of state of the art diesel aftertreatment technologies (DPF, urea-SCR and DOC), gasoline combustion systems (lean burn/stoichiometric DISI and MPI) and fuel qualities effects (EtOH, ETBE, FAME, aromatics and distillation). SAE paper 2007-01-4083, 2007.
35. GiechaskielBMunoz-BuenoRRubinoL. Particle size and number emissions before, during and after regeneration events of a Euro 4 DPF equipped light-duty diesel vehicle. SAE paper 2007-01-1944, 2007.