Advances in the Prediction of Protein-Peptide Binding Affinities: Implications for Peptide-Based Drug Discovery

Chemical Biology and Drug Design

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 50-60

  Audie, Joseph ^a,b   Swanson, Jon ^c  

^a CMDBioscience Inc   (United States)

^b SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ChemModeling LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Molecular modeling; Molecular recognition; Peptide; Structure based drug design; Virtual screening

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN SH2; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE; PROTEINASE; TRIPEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG STRUCTURE; ENTROPY; ISOMERIZATION; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DESIGN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84871378456     PISSN: 17470277     EISSN: 17470285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12076     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Vlieghe P., Lisowski V., Martinez J., Khrestchatisky M. (2010) Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. Drug Discovery Today;15:40-56.
2. Briand J.P., Muller S. (2010) Emerging peptide therapeutics for inflammatory autoimmune diseases. Curr Pharm Des;16:1136-1142.
3. Bellmann-Sickert K., Beck-Sickinger A.G. (2010) Peptide drugs to target G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci;31:434-441.
4. Audie J., Boyd C. (2011) The synergistic use of computation, chemistry and biology to discover novel peptide-based drugs: the time is right. Curr Pharm Des;16:567-582.
5. Hou T., Chen K., McLaughlin W.A., Lu B., Wang W. (2006) Computational analysis and prediction of the binding motif and protein interacting partners of the Abl SH3 domain. PLoS Comput Biol;2:e1.
6. Strockbine B., Rizzo R.C. (2007) Binding of antifusion peptides with HIVgp41 from molecular dynamics simulations: quantitative correlation with experiment. Proteins;67:630-642.
7. Feliu E., Aloy P., Oliva B. (2011) On the analysis of protein-protein interactions via knowledge-based potentials for the prediction of protein-protein docking. Protein Sci;20:529-541.
8. Pons C., Talavera D., de la Cruz X., Orozco M., Fernandez-Recio J. (2011) Scoring by intermolecular pairwise propensities of exposed residues (SIPPER): a new efficient potential for protein-protein docking. J Chem Inf Model;51:370-377.
9. Ajay, Murcko M.A. (1995) Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes. J Med Chem;38:4953-4967.
10. Ponder J.W., Case D.A. (2003) Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Protein Chem;66:27-85, Review.
11. Cornell W.D., Cieplak P., Bayly C.I., Gould I.R., Merz K.M. Jr., Ferguson D.M., Spellmeyer D.C., Fox T., Caldwell J.W., Kollman P.A. (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc;117:5179-5197.
12. MacKerell A.D. Jr., Bashford D., Bellott M., Dunbrack R.L. Jr., Evanseck J.D., Field M.J., Fischer S. et al. (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B;102:3586-3616.
13. Christen M., Hünenberger P.H., Bakowies D., Baron R., Bürgi R., Geerke D.P., Heinz T.N., Kastenholz M.A., Kräutler V., Oostenbrink C., Peter C., Trzesniak D., van Gunsteren W.F. (2005) The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05. J Comput Chem;26:1719-1751.
14. Jorgensen W.L., Maxwell D.S., Tirado-Rives J. (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc;118:11225-11236.
15. Kaminski G.A., Friesner R.A., Tirado-Rives J., Jorgensen W.L. (2001) Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B;105:6474-6487.
16. Schapira M., Totrov M., Abagyan R. (1999) Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins. J Mol Recognit;12:177-190.
17. Wang T., Wade R.C. (2002) Comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis of OppA-peptide complexes to relate structure to binding thermodynamics. J Med Chem;45:4828-4837.
18. Tian F., Yang L., Lv F., Luo X., Pan Y. (2011) Why OppA protein can bind sequence-independent peptides? A combination of QM/MM, PB/SA, and structure-based QSAR analyses. Amino Acids;40:493-503.
19. Rognan D., Lauemoller S.L., Holm A., Buus S., Tschinke V. (1999) Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. J Med Chem;42:4650-4658.
20. Liao W.W., Arthur J.W. (2011) Predicting peptide binding affinities to MHC molecules using a modified semi-empirical scoring function. PLoS ONE;6:e25055.
21. Audie J., Scarlata S. (2007) A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities. Biophys Chem;129:198-211.
22. Audie J. (2009) Development and validation of an empirical free energy function for calculating protein-protein binding free energy surfaces. Biophys Chem;9:84-91.
23. Audie J. (2009) Continued development of an empirical function for predicting and rationalizing protein-protein binding affinities. Biophys Chem;143:139-144.
24. Sippl M.J. (1995) Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol;5:229-235.
25. Liu S., Zhang C., Zhou H., Zhou Y. (2004) A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins;56:93-101.
26. Zhang C., Liu S., Zhu Q., Zhou Y. (2005) A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. J Med Chem;48:2325-2335.
27. Su Y., Zhou A., Xia X., Li W., Sun Z. (2009) Protein Sci;18:2550-2558.
28. Vreven T., Hwang H., Pierce B.G., Weng Z. (2012) Prediction of protein-protein binding free energies. Protein Sci;21:396-404.
29. Moal I.H., Agius R., Bates P.A. (2011) Protein-protein binding affinity prediction on a diverse set of structures. Bioinformatics;27:3002-3009.
30. Kastritis P.L., Moal I.H., Hwang H., Weng Z., Bates P.A., Alexandre M.J.J., Bonvin A.M.J.J., Janin J. (2011) Protein. Science;20:482-491.
31. Bellows M.L., Fung H.K., Taylor M.S., Floudas C.A., López de Victoria A., Morikis D. (2010) New compstatin variants through two de novo protein design frameworks. Biophys J;98:2337-2346.
32. Hao J., Serohijos A.W., Newton G., Tassone G., Wang Z., Sgroi D.C., Dokholyan N.V., Basilion J.P. (2008) Identification and rational redesign of peptide ligands to CRIP1, a novel biomarker for cancers. PLoS Comput Biol;4:e1000138.
33. Ben-Shimon A., Niv M.Y. (2011) Deciphering the Arginine-binding preferences at the substrate-binding groove of Ser/Thr kinases by computational surface mapping. PLoS Comput Biol;7:e1002288.
34. Sleigh S.H., Tame J.R., Dodson E.J., Wilkinson A.J. (1997) Peptide binding in OppA, the crystal structures of the periplasmic oligopeptide binding protein in the unliganded form and in complex with lysyllysine. Biochemistry;36:9747-9758.
35. Davies T.G., Hubbard R.E., Tame J.R. (1999) Relating structure to thermodynamics: the crystal structures and binding affinity of eight OppA-peptide complexes. Protein Sci;8:1432-1444.
36. Sleigh S.H., Seavers P.R., Wilkinson A.J., Ladbury J.E., Tame J.R. (1999) Crystallographic and calorimetric analysis of peptide binding to OppA protein. J Mol Biol;291:393-415.