Upper threshold of extracellular neural stimulation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3233-3238

  Boinagrov, David ^a   Pangratz Fuehrer, Susanne ^a,b   Suh, Bongsoo ^c   Mathieson, Keith ^a   Naik, Natasha ^a,b   Palanker, Daniel ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Neural; Prosthesis; Retinal; Stimulation

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL MEMBRANE DEPOLARIZATION; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SODIUM CURRENT;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; NEURONS; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS;

EID: 84871345774     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01058.2011     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. 2+]i signals generated by electroporation functionally mimic those evoked by hormonal stimulation. FASEB J 13: 365-376, 1999.
2. Boinagrov D, Loudin J, Palanker D. Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. J Neurophysiol 104: 2236-2248, 2010.
3. Breit S, Schulz JB, Benabid AL. Deep brain stimulation. Cell Tissue Res 318: 275-288, 2004.
4. Brummer SB, Turner MJ. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: IIestimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non-gassing) limits. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 24: 440-443, 1977.
5. Buitenweg JR, Rutten WLC, Marani E. Extracellular stimulation window explained by a geometry-based model of the neuron-electrode contact. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49: 1591-1599, 2002.
6. Butterwick A, Vankov A, Huie P, Freyvert Y, Palanker D. Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54: 2261-2267, 2007.
7. Cogan SF, Ehrlich J, Plante TD, Smirnov A, Shire DB, Gingerich M, Rizzo JF. Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for neural stimulation electrodes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 6: 4153-4156, 2004.
8. Fohlmeister JE, Miller RF. Impulse encoding mechanisms of ganglion cells in the tiger salamander retina. J Neurophysiol 78: 1935-1947, 1997.
9. Fried SI, Hsueh HA, Werblin FS. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 95: 970-978, 2006.
10. Fried SI, Lasker ACW, Desai NJ, Eddington DK, Rizzo JF 3rd. Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 101: 1972-1987, 2009.
11. Greenberg RJ, Velte TJ, Humayun MS, Scarlatis GN, de Juan E Jr. A computational model of electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46: 505-514, 1999.
12. Godec C, Cass AS, Ayala GF. Bladder inhibition with functional electrical stimulation. Urology 6: 663-666, 1975.
13. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117: 500-554, 1952.
14. House WF, Urban J. Long term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 82: 504-17, 1973.
15. Jankowska E, Roberts WJ. An electrophysiological demonstration of the axonal projections of single spinal interneurones in the cat. J Physiol 222: 597-622, 1972.
16. Jensen RJ, Rizzo JF 3rd, Ziv OR, Grumet A, Wyatt J. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 3533-3543, 2003.
17. Jensen RJ, Ziv O, Rizzo JF 3rd. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 1486-1496, 2005.
18. Jensen RJ, Rizzo JF 3rd. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with a subretinal electrode. Exp Eye Res 83: 367-373, 2006.
19. Katz B, Miledi R. Propagation of electric activity in motor nerve terminals. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 161: 453-482, 1965.
20. Kern DS, Kumar R. Deep brain stimulation. Neurologist 13: 237-252, 2005.
21. Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey LL, Lojovich JM, Carey JR. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res 154: 450-460, 2004.
22. Krauss JK, Yianni J, Loher TJ, Aziz TZ. Deep brain stimulation for dystonia. J Clin Neurophysiol 21: 18-30, 2004.
23. Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK. Deep brain stimulation for intractable pain: a 15-year experience. Neurosurgery 40: 736-747, 1997.
24. Kringelbach ML, Jenkinson N, Owen SL, Aziz TZ. Translational principles of deep brain stimulation. Nat Rev Neurosci 8: 623-635, 2007.
25. Leone M. Deep brain stimulation in headache. Lancet Neurol 5: 873-877, 2006.
26. Long DM, Erickson D, Campbell J, North R. Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves for pain control. Appl Neurophysiol 44: 207-217, 1981.
27. Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, McNeely HE, Seminowicz D, Hamani C, Schwalb JM, Kennedy SH. Deep brain stimulation for treatmentresistant depression. Neuron 45: 651-660, 2005.
28. McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TGH, Bullara L. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37: 996-1001, 1990.
29. Palanker D, Vankov A, Huie P, Baccus S. Design of a high resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis. J Neural Eng 2: S105-S120, 2005.
30. Perlmutter JS, Mink JW. Deep brain stimulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 29: 229-257, 2006.
31. Plaha P, Gill SS. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine nucleus for Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport 16: 1883-1887, 2005.
32. Ranck J Jr. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res 98: 417-440, 1975.
33. Rizzo JF 3rd, Wyatt J. Prospects for a visual prosthesis. Neuroscientist 3: 251-262, 1997.
34. Sakmann B, Neher E. Patch clamp techniques for studying ionic channels in excitable membranes. Annu Rev Physiol 46: 455-72, 1984.
35. Saulis G. Pore disappearance in a cell after electroporation: theoretical simulation and comparison with experiments. Biophys J 73: 1299-1309, 1997.
36. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ. Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. J Neurophysiol 95: 3311-3327, 2006.
37. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ. High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design. J Neurosci 28: 4446-4456, 2008.
38. Spelman FA. The past, present, and future of cochlear prostheses. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 18: 27-33, 1999.
39. Stett A, Barth W, Weiss S, Haemmerle H, Zrenner E. Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina. Vision Res 40: 1785-1795, 2000.
40. Stett A, Mai A, Herrmann T. Retinal charge sensitivity and spatial discrimination obtainable by subretinal implants: key lessons learned from isolated chicken retina. J Neural Eng 4: S7-S16, 2007.
41. Tsai D, Morley JW, Gregg J, Suaning GJ, Lovell NH. Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. J Neurophysiol 102: 2982-2993, 2009.
42. Vercueil L, Pollak P, Fraix V, Caputo E, Moro E, Benazzouz A, Xie J, Koudsie A, Benabid AL. Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of severe dystonia. J Neurol 248: 695-700, 2001.
43. Weiland JD, Liu W, Humayun MS. Retinal prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 7: 361-401, 2005.
44. Zierhofer C, Hochmair-Desoyer I, Hochmair E. Electronic design of a cochlear implant for multichannel high-rate pulsatile stimulation strategies. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 3: 112-116, 1995.
45. Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Benav H, Besch D, Bruckmann A, Gabel VP, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Harscher A, Kibbel S, Koch J, Kusnyerik A, Peters T, Stingl K, Sachs H, Stett A, Szurman P, Wilhelm B, Wilke R. Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278: 1489-1497, 2011.