메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 347-359

Discussion paper: Hard cases make bad law-reactions to R v T

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84871298706     PISSN: 14708396     EISSN: 1470840X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgs020     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (20)

References (42)
  • 1
    • 69449098011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
    • Association of Forensic Science Providers
    • Association of Forensic Science Providers. (2009). Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Science & Justice, 161, 161-184.
    • (2009) Science & Justice , vol.161 , pp. 161-184
  • 3
    • 84871268692 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: An analysis and discussion in the light of R v T
    • This issue.
    • BIEDERMAN, F. & TARONI (2012). How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: An analysis and discussion in the light of R v T. Law Probability and Risk, this issue.
    • (2012) Law Probability and Risk
    • Biederman, F.1    Taroni2
  • 4
    • 84871336947 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Traditional conclusions in footwear examinations versus the use of the Bayesian approach and likelihood ratio: A review of a recent UK appellate court decision
    • BODZIAK, W. J. (2012). Traditional conclusions in footwear examinations versus the use of the Bayesian approach and likelihood ratio: A review of a recent UK appellate court decision. Law Probability and Risk, this issue.
    • (2012) Law Probability and Risk, this issue.
    • Bodziak, W.J.1
  • 5
    • 33745967855 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A framework for interpreting evidence
    • Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation (J. Buckleton, C. M. Triggs and S. J. Walsh eds.). 27-63. CRC Press.
    • BUCKLETON, J. (2005). A framework for interpreting evidence. In: Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation (J. Buckleton, C. M. Triggs and S. J. Walsh eds.). 27-63. CRC Press.
    • (2005)
    • Buckleton, J.1
  • 6
    • 3142735354 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions
    • CHAMPOD, C., EVETT, I. & JACKSON, G. (2004). Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions. Science & Justice, 44, 153-163.
    • (2004) Science & Justice , vol.44 , pp. 153-163
    • Champod, C.1    Evett, I.2    Jackson, G.3
  • 7
    • 77957224507 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: The new epistemology of forensic identification
    • COLE, S. A. (2009). Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: The new epistemology of forensic identification. Law, Probability and Risk, 8, 233-255
    • (2009) Law Probability and Risk , vol.8 , pp. 233-25
    • Cole, S.A.1
  • 9
    • 77956336585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Inclusions probabilities and dropout
    • CURRAN, J.M. & BUCKLETON, J. (2010). Inclusions probabilities and dropout. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 55 (5), 1171-1173.
    • (2010) Journal of Forensic Sciences , vol.55 , Issue.5 , pp. 1171-1173
    • Curran, J.M.1    Buckleton, J.2
  • 10
    • 47349111028 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts
    • DROR, I. E. & ROSENTHAL, R. (2008). Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53 (4), 900-903.
    • (2008) Journal of Forensic Sciences , vol.53 , Issue.4 , pp. 900-903
    • Dror, I.E.1    Rosenthal, R.2
  • 11
    • 0031821209 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework
    • EVETT, I.W. (1998). Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework. Science & Justice, 38, 198-202.
    • (1998) Science & Justice , vol.38 , pp. 198-202
    • Evett, I.W.1
  • 12
    • 84871293474 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists
    • EVETT, I.W. & WEIR, B. S. (1998). Interpreting DNA Evidence: StatisticalGenetics for Forensic Scientists. Sinaur and Associates.
    • (1998) Sinaur & Associates.
    • Evett, I.W.1    Weir, B.S.2
  • 14
    • 23044529157 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The psychology of numbers in the courtroom: How to make DNA-match statistics seem impressive or insufficient
    • KOEHLER, J. J. (2001). The psychology of numbers in the courtroom: How to make DNA-match statistics seem impressive or insufficient. Southern California Law Review, 74, 1275-1325.
    • (2001) Southern California Law Review , vol.74 , pp. 1275-1325
    • Koehler, J.J.1
  • 16
    • 0012464729 scopus 로고
    • Modeling relevance
    • LEMPERT, R. (1977). Modeling relevance. Michigan Law Review, 75, 1021-1089.
    • (1977) Michigan Law Review , vol.75 , pp. 1021-1089
    • Lempert, R.1
  • 17
    • 84871338017 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law
    • This issue.
    • LIGERTWOOD, A. & EDMOND, G. (2012). Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law. Law Probability and Risk, this issue.
    • (2012) Law Probability and Risk
    • Ligertwood, A.1    Edmond, G.2
  • 18
    • 84871269854 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The likelihood-ratio framework and forensic evidence in court: A response to R v T
    • MORRISON, G. S. (2011). The likelihood-ratio framework and forensic evidence in court: A response to R v T. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 15, 1-29.
    • (2011) International Journal of Evidence and Proof , vol.15 , pp. 1-29
    • Morrison, G.S.1
  • 19
    • 78649528111 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Forensic voice comparison. Ch. 99
    • (I. Freckelton & H. Selby eds.). Thomson Reuters.
    • MORRISON, G. S. (2010). Forensic voice comparison. Ch. 99. In: Expert Evidence (I. Freckelton & H. Selby eds.). 1-106. Thomson Reuters.
    • (2010) Expert Evidence , pp. 1-106
    • Morrison, G.S.1
  • 20
    • 84871307058 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Understanding potential errors and fallacies in forensic DNA statistics: An amicus brief in McDaniel v
    • National Research Council of the National Academy of Science (2009). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. National Academies Press.
    • MURPHY, E. & THOMPSON, W. C. (2010). Understanding potential errors and fallacies in forensic DNA statistics: An amicus brief in McDaniel v. Brown. Criminal Law Bulletin, 46 (4), 709-757.
    • (2010) Brown. Criminal Law Bulletin , vol.46 , Issue.4 , pp. 709-757
    • Murphy, E.1    Thompson, W.C.2
  • 21
    • 68649108740 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Research Council of the National Academy of Science. National Academies Press
    • National Research Council of the National Academy of Science (2009). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. National Academies Press.
    • (2009) Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward
  • 22
    • 84871296390 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The likelihood ratio as value of evidence-more than a question of numbers
    • This issue.
    • NORDGAARD, B. & RASMUSSON (2012). The likelihood ratio as value of evidence-more than a question of numbers. Law Probability and Risk, this issue.
    • (2012) Law Probability and Risk
    • Nordgaard, B.1    Rasmusson2
  • 24
    • 41449101021 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Juridical proof and the best explanation
    • PARDO, M. & ALLEN, R. (2008). Juridical proof and the best explanation. Law and Philosophy, 27, 223-302.
    • (2008) Law and Philosophy , vol.27 , pp. 223-302
    • Pardo, M.1    Allen, R.2
  • 27
    • 79958792807 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (Denis) (No 2)
    • R v Adams (Denis) (No 2)(1997) 1 Cr.App.Rep 377.
    • (1997) Cr.App. Rep , vol.1 , pp. 377
    • Adams, R.V.1
  • 29
  • 30
    • 84875288413 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Some reservations about likelihood ratios (and some aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism'
    • In press, doi:10.1093/lpr/MGS011.
    • RISINGER, D. M. Some reservations about likelihood ratios (and some aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism'). Law, Probability and Risk, in press, doi:10.1093/lpr/MGS011.
    • Law, Probability and Risk
    • Risinger, D.M.1
  • 31
    • 0036332126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion
    • RISINGER, D. M., SAKS, M. J, THOMPSON, W. C. & ROSENTHAL, R. (2002). The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90 (1), 1-56.
    • (2002) California Law Review , vol.90 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-56
    • Risinger, D.M.1    Saks, M.J.2    Thompson, W.C.3    Rosenthal, R.4
  • 32
    • 0003928558 scopus 로고
    • Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science In The Courtroom
    • ROBERTSON, B. & VIGNAUX, G. A. (1995). Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. John Wiley & Sons.
    • (1995) John Wiley & Sons
    • Robertson, B.1    Vignaux, G.A.2
  • 34
    • 84871305254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How clear is transparent? Reporting expert reasoning in legal cases.
    • This issue.
    • SJERPS, M. & BERGER, C. (2012). How clear is transparent? Reporting expert reasoning in legal cases. Law Probability and Risk, this issue.
    • (2012) Law Probability and Risk
    • Sjerps, M.1    Berger, C.2
  • 35
    • 79957507152 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?
    • THOMPSON, W. C. (2011). What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43 (2-3), 123-134.
    • (2011) Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences , vol.43 , Issue.2-3 , pp. 123-134
    • Thompson, W.C.1
  • 36
    • 77955052318 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Painting the target around the matching profile: The Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation
    • THOMPSON, W. C. (2009). Painting the target around the matching profile: The Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation. Law, Probability and Risk, 8, 257-276.
    • (2009) Law, Probability and Risk , vol.8 , pp. 257-276
    • Thompson, W.C.1
  • 37
    • 0012397740 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accepting lower standards: The National Research Council's second report on forensic DNA evidence
    • THOMPSON, W. C. (1997). Accepting lower standards: The National Research Council's second report on forensic DNA evidence. Jurimetrics Journal, 37 (4), 405-424.
    • (1997) Jurimetrics Journal , vol.37 , Issue.4 , pp. 405-424
    • Thompson, W.C.1
  • 38
    • 34548594459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence
    • (M. Costanzo, D. Krauss & K. Pezdek eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • THOMPSON, W. C. & COLE, S. A. (2007). Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence. In: Expert Psychological Testimony for the Courts (M. Costanzo, D. Krauss & K. Pezdek eds.). 31-68. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • (2007) Expert Psychological Testimony for the Courts , pp. 31-68
    • Thompson, W.C.1    Cole, S.A.2
  • 40
    • 0000312731 scopus 로고
    • Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy
    • THOMPSON, W. C. & SCHUMANN, E. L. (1987). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 167-187.
    • (1987) Law and Human Behavior , vol.11 , pp. 167-187
    • Thompson, W.C.1    Schumann, E.L.2
  • 41
    • 20744442705 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination
    • UHLMANN, E. L. & COHEN, G. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16 (6), 474-480.
    • (2005) Psychological Science , vol.16 , Issue.6 , pp. 474-480
    • Uhlmann, E.L.1    Cohen, G.2
  • 42
    • 84871267896 scopus 로고
    • United States v. Yee. 134 F.R.D. 161, aff'd. sub nom. U.S. v. Bonds (1993) 12 F.3d 540.
    • United States v. Yee (1991) 134 F.R.D. 161, aff'd. sub nom. U.S. v. Bonds (1993) 12 F.3d 540.
    • (1991)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.