Single trial ERP reading based on parallel factor analysis

Psychophysiology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 97-110

  Vanderperren, Katrien ^a,b   Mijović, Bogdan ^a,b   Novitskiy, Nikolay ^b   Vanrumste, Bart ^a,c   Stiers, Peter ^d   Van den Bergh, Bea R H ^b,e,f   Lagae, Lieven ^b   Sunaert, Stefan ^g   Wagemans, Johan ^b   Van Huffel, Sabine ^a,b   De Vos, Maarten ^a,h  

^a Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c Thomas More University College   (Belgium)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f Public Health and Family ^*  (Belgium)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognition; EEG ERP; FMRI PET MRI; Normal volunteers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871296300     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01405.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Achim, A., & Bouchard, S. (1997). Toward a dynamic topographic components model. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 103, 381-385. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)96055-0
2. Allen, P., Josephs, O., & Turner, R. (2000). A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. NeuroImage, 12, 230-239. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0599
3. Andersson, C., & Bro, R. (2000). The N-way toolbox for MATLAB. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 52, 1-4. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7439(00)00071-X
4. Becker, R., Reinacher, M., Freyer, F., Villringer, A., & Ritter, P. (2011). How ongoing neuronal oscillations account for variability of evoked fMRI responses. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 11016-11027. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0210-11.2011
5. Bénar, C. G., Schön, D., Grimault, S., Nazarian, B., Burle, B., Roth, M., ... Anton, J. L. (2007). Single trial analysis of oddball event-related potentials in simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 602-613. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20289
6. Bland, A., Mushtaq, F., & Smith, D. (2011). Exploiting trial-to-trial variability in multimodal experiments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1-3. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00080
7. Carroll, J., & Chang, J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "eckartyoung" decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319. doi: 10.1007/BF02310791
8. Cichocki, A., Washizawa, Y., Rutkowski, T., Bakardjian, H., Phan, A.-H., Choi, S., ... Li, Y. (2008). Noninvasive BCIs: Multiway signal-processing array decompositions. Computer, 41, 34-42. doi: 10.1109/MC.2008.431
9. De Martino, F., de Borst, A., Valente, G., Goebel, R., & Formisano, E. (2011). Predicting EEG single trial responses with simultaneous fMRI and relevance vector machine regression. NeuroImage, 56, 826-836. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.068
10. De Vos, M., De Lathauwer, L., & Van Huffel, S. (2011). Spatially constrained ICA algorithms with applications in EEG processing. Signal Processing, 91, 1963-1972. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2011.02.019
11. De Vos, M., De Lathauwer, L., Vanrumste, B., Van Huffel, S., & Van Paesschen, W. (2007). Canonical decomposition of ictal scalp EEG and accurate source localisation: Principles and simulation study. [Special issue]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, EEG/MEG, 2007, 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2007/58253
12. De Vos, M., Riès, S., Vanderperren, K., Vanrumste, B., Alario, F.-X., Van Huffel, S., & Burle, B. (2010). Removal of muscle artifacts from EEG recordings of spoken language production. Neuroinformatics, 8, 135-150. doi: 10.1007/s12021-010-9071-0
13. De Vos, M., Vergult, A., De Lathauwer, L., De Clercq, W., Van Huffel, S., Dupont, P., ... Van Paesschen, W. (2007). Canonical decomposition of ictal scalp EEG reliably detects the seizure onset zone. NeuroImage, 37, 844-854. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.041
14. Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., & Engel, A. (2006). Single-trial EEG-fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 558-563. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.010
15. Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D., & Engel, A. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730-11737. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3286-05.2005
16. Deburchgraeve, W., Cherian, P., De Vos, M., Swarte, R., Blok, J., Visser, G., ... Van Huffel, S. (2009). Neonatal seizure localization using PARAFAC decomposition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 1787-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.044
17. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10010
18. Eichele, T., Calhoun, V., & Debener, S. (2009). Mining EEG-fMRI using independent component analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73, 53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.12.018
19. Eichele, T., Specht, K., Moosmann, M., Jongsma, M., Quiroga, R., Nordby, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2005). Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 17798-17803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505508102
20. Field, A., & Graupe, D. (1991). Topographic component (parallel factor) analysis of multichannel evoked potentials: Practical issues in trilinear spatiotemporal decomposition. Brain Topography, 3, 407-423.
21. Harshman, R. (1970). Foundations of the CP procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 16, 1-84. doi: 10.1.1.144.5652
22. Harshman, R., & Lundy, M. (1984). Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In H. Law, C. Snyder, Jr., J. Hattie, & R. McDonald (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 216-284). New York, NY: Praeger.
23. Joyce, C., Gorodnitsky, I., & Kutas, M. (2004). Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. Psychophysiology, 41, 313-325. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00141
24. Lee, H., Kim, Y., Cichocki, A., & Choi, S. (2007). Nonnegative tensor factorization for continuous EEG classification. International Journal of Neural Systems, 17, 305-317. doi: 10.1.1.81.3785
25. Li, J., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Q. (2008). Pattern classification of visual evoked potentials based on parallel factor analysis. In R. Wang, E. Shen, & F. Gu (Eds.), Advances in cognitive neurodynamics ICCN 2007 (pp. 571-575). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8387-7_99
26. Makeig, S., Jung, T.-P., Bell, A., Ghahremani, D., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 10979-10984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10979
27. Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Covington, J., Townsend, J., Sejnowski, T., & Courchesne, E. (1999). Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2665-2680. doi: 10.1.1.164.3923
28. Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 295, 690-694. doi: 10.1126/science.1066168
29. Mijović, B., Vanderperren, K., Novitskiy, N., Vanrumste, B., Stiers, P., Van den Bergh, B., ... De Vos, M. (2012). The "why" and "how" of JointICA: Results from a visual detection task. NeuroImage, 60, 1171-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.063
30. Miwakeichi, F., Martínez-Montes, E., Valdés-Sosa, P., Nishiyama, N., Mizuhara, H., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2004). Decomposing EEG data into space-time-frequency components using parallel factor analysis. NeuroImage, 22, 1035-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.039
31. Möcks, J. (1988a). Decomposing event-related potentials: A new topographic components model. Biological Psychology, 26, 199-215. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(88)90020-8
32. Möcks, J. (1988b). Topographic components model for event-related potentials and some biophysical considerations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35, 482-484. doi: 10.1109/10.2119
33. Mørup, M., Hansen, L., Arnfred, S., Lim, L.-H., & Madsen, K. (2008). Shift-invariant multilinear decomposition of neuroimaging data. NeuroImage, 42, 1439-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.062
34. Mørup, M., Hansen, L., Herrmann, C., Parnas, J., & Arnfred, S. (2006). Parallel factor analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG. NeuroImage, 29, 938-947. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.005
35. Moosmann, M., Schonfelder, V., Specht, K., Scheeringa, R., Nordby, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2009). Realignment parameter-informed artefact correction for simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings. NeuroImage, 45, 1144-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.024
36. Niazy, R., Beckmann, C., Iannetti, G., Brady, J., & Smith, S. (2005). Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets. NeuroImage, 28, 720-737. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.067
37. Novitskiy, N., Ramautar, J., Vanderperren, K., De Vos, M., Mennes, M., Mijović, B., ... Wagemans, J. (2011). The BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1 in single-trial analysis of simultaneous EEG-fMRI recording during a spatial detection task. NeuroImage, 54, 824-835. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.041
38. Smilde, A., Bro, R., & Geladi, P. (2004). Multi-way analysis with applications in the chemical sciences. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/0470012110
39. Vanderperren, K., De Vos, M., Ramautar, J., Novitskiy, N., Mennes, M., Assecondi, S., ... Van Huffel, S. (2010). Removal of BCG artifacts from EEG recordings inside the MR scanner: A comparison of methodological and validation-related aspects. NeuroImage, 50, 920-934. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.010
40. Vartiainen, J., Liljeström, M., Koskinen, M., Renvall, H., & Salmelin, R. (2011). Functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and magnetoencephalography evoked responses yield different neural functionality in reading. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1048-1058. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3113-10.2011
41. Wang, K., Begleiter, H., & Porjesz, B. (2000). Trilinear modeling of event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 12, 263-271. doi: 10.1023/A:1023455404934
42. Wesensten, N. J., Badia, P., & Harsh, J. (1990). Time of day, repeated testing, and interblock interval effects on P300 amplitude. Physiology & Behavior, 47, 653-658. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90073-D