Trilinear modeling of event-related potentials

Brain Topography

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 263-271

  Wang, Kongming ^a   Begleiter, Henri ^a   Porjesz, Bernice ^a  

^a SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain mapping; Event related potentials; Topographic component model; Trilinear modeling

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; MODEL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOPOGRAPHY; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0033944474     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023455404934     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Achim, A. and Bouchard, S. Toward a dynamic topographic components model. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys., 1997, 103: 381-385.
2. Bell, A. and Sejnowski, T. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comp., 1995, 7: 1129-1159.
3. Donchin, E. and Heffley, E. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In: D. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington DC, 1978: 555-572.
4. Field, S. and Graupe, D. Topographic components analysis of evoked potentials: estimation of model parameters and evaluation of parameter uniqueness. J. Biomed. Eng., 1990, 12: 287-300.
5. Field, S. and Graupe, D. Topographic component (parallel factor) analysis of multichannel evoked potentials: practical issues in trilinear spatiotemporal decomposition. Brain Topography, 1991, 3: 407-423.
6. Glaser, E. and Ruchkin, D. Principles of neurobiological signal analysis. Academic Press, New York, 1976: 233:290.
7. Harner, R. Singular value decomposition - a general linear model for analysis of multivariate structure in the electroencephalogram. Brain Topography, 1990, 3: 43-47.
8. John, E., Ruchkin, D. and Villegas, J. Experimental background: signal analysis and behavioral correlations of evoked potential configuration in cats. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1964, 112: 362-420.
9. Makeig, S., Bell, A., Jung, T. and Sejnowski, T. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. In: D. Touretzky, M. Mozer and M. Hasselmo (Eds.), Advances in neural info. proc. sys. 8, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1996: 145-151.
10. Meyer, Y. Wavelets Algorithms & Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1993.
11. Mocks, J. Topographic components model for event-related potentials and some biophysical considerations. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1988, 35: 482-484.
12. Samar, V., Begleiter, H., Chapa, J., Raghuveer, M., Orlando, M. and Chorlian, D. Matched Meyer neural wavelets for clinical and experimental analysis of auditory and visual evoked potentials. Proceeding of the VIII European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO-96), Trieste, Sept. 1996: 10-13.
13. Samar, V., Swartz, K. and Raghuveer, M. Multiresolution analysis of event-related potentials by wavelet decomposition. Brain and Cognition, 1995, 27: 398-438.
14. Turetsky, B., Raz, J. and Fein, G. Representation of multichannel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophys., 1990, 76: 540-556.
15. Wang, K. and Begleiter, H. Local polynomial estimate of surface Laplacian. Brain Topography, 1999, 12: 19-29.
16. Wang, K., Begleiter, H. and Porjesz, B. Spatial enhancement of event-related potentials using multiresolution analysis. Brain Topography, 1998,10: 191-200.