Toward a dynamic topographic components model

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 381-385

  Achim, André ^a   Bouchard, Sylvie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Component jitter; Event related potentials; Topographic component model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; DYNAMICS; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 0031238783     PISSN: 00134694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)96055-0     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Donchin, E. and Heffley, E.F. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data; a tutorial review. In: D.A. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-Related Brain Potential Research. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1978, pp. 555-572.
2. Field, A.S. and Graupe, D. Topographic component (parallel factor) analysis of multichannel evoked potentials: practical issues in trilinear spatiotemporal decomposition. Brain Topogr., 1991, 3: 407-423.
3. Harshman, R.A. Foundation of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an 'explanatory' multi-mode factor analysis. UCLA Working Paper in Phonetics, 1970, 16: 1-84.
4. Harshman, R.A. and Lundy, M.E. The PARAFAC model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In: H.G. Law et al. (Eds.), Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis. Praeger, New York, 1984a, pp. 122-215.
5. Harshman, R.A. and Lundy, M.E. Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In: H.G. Law et al. (Eds.), Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis. Praeger, New York, 1984b, pp. 216-284.
6. Möcks, J. Topographic components model for event-related potentials and some biophysical considerations. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1988a, 35: 482-484.
7. Möcks, J. Decomposing event-related potentials: a new topographic components model. Biol. Psychol., 1988b, 26: 199-215.
8. Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology, Vol. 6. Karger, Basel, 1990, pp. 40-69.
9. Turetsky, B., Raz, J. and Fein, G. Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 76: 540-556.
10. Zhang, Z. and Jewett, D.L. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time point due to model misspecification of number of shells. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 88: 1-11.
11. Zhang, Z., Jewett, D.L. and Goodwill, G. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time points. Brain Topogr., 1994, 6: 283-298.