Differences in performance of five types of aortic valve prostheses: Haemodynamic assessment by dobutamine stress echocardiography

Heart

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 41-47

  Khoo, Jeffrey P ^a,b   Davies, Joan E ^a   Ang, Keng Leong ^c   Galiñanes, Manuel ^c,d   Chin, Derek T ^a  

^a GLENFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOBUTAMINE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; AORTIC VALVE GRADIENT; AORTIC VALVE RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIMENSIONLESS SEVERITY INDEX; DISEASE SEVERITY; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; LOW DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84871276688     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302256     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2413-26.
2. Huang G, Rahimtoola SH. Prosthetic heart valve. Circulation 2011;123:2602-5.
3. Dunning J, Graham RJ, Thambyrajah J, et al. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2369-74. (Pubitemid 47537788)
4. Cohen G, Zagorski B, Christakis GT, et al. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:848-59.
5. Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Thornley AR, et al. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:73-8. (Pubitemid 46921121)
6. Payne DM, Koka HP, Karanicolas PJ. Hemodynamic performance of stentless versus stented valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2008;23:556-64.
7. Hobson NA, Wilkinson GA, Wheeldon NM, et al . Hemodynamic performance of the Ultracor and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses using exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:828-34.
8. Chambers J, Rimington H, Rajani R, et al. Hemodynamic performance on exercise: comparison of a stentless and stented biological aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:729-33.
9. Silberman S, Shaheen J, Fink D, et al. Comparison of exercise hemodynamics among nonstented aortic bioprostheses, mechanical valves, and normal native aortic valves. J Card Surg 1998;13:412-16. (Pubitemid 29325894)
10. Donatelli F, Triggiani M, Mariani MA, et al. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of stentless porcine bioprostheses in aortic position. Cardiologia 1994;39:41-7.
11. Becassis P, Hayot M, Frapier JM, et al. Postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement by small-size prosthesis: functional consequence of small-size aortic prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:871-7.
12. Hunziker PR, Spöndlin B, Hediger S, et al. Long-term follow-up and dobutamine stress echocardiography of 19-mm prosthetic heart valves. Echocardiography 1998;15:617-24. (Pubitemid 28531518)
13. Minardi G, Manzara C, Creazzo V, et al. Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;1:27-33.
14. Tsai CH, Lee TM, Wang CH, et al . Effects of dobutamine on aortic valve indexes in asymptomatic patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic valve position. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1546-9. (Pubitemid 27251083)
15. Cannon JD, Zile MR, Crawford FA Jr, et al. Aortic valve resistance as an adjunct to the Gorlin formula in assessing severity of aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1517-23. (Pubitemid 23007505)
16. Antonini-Canterini F, Faggiano P, Zanuttini D. Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis? Heart 1999;82:9-10. (Pubitemid 29309226)
17. Takeda S, Rimington H, Chambers J. The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. Heart 1999;82:11-14. (Pubitemid 29309227)
18. Bountioukos M, Kertai MD, Schinkel AF, et al. Safety of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:441-6. (Pubitemid 36975030)
19. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 practice guidelines for the Management of patients with Valvular heart Disease. Circulation 2006;114:e84-231.
20. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:230-68. (Pubitemid 46276943)
21. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:1-25.
22. Ali A, Halstead JC, Cafferty F, et al. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Circulation 2006;114(1 Suppl):I535-40. (Pubitemid 44297204)
23. Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, et al . Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 2005;112:2696-702.
24. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Keithahn A, et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1056-63. (Pubitemid 40631426)
25. Morsy S, Zahran M, Usama M, et al. Hemodynamic performance of stentless porcine bioprosthesis and mechanical bileaflet prosthesis using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13(4 Suppl 1):129-35. (Pubitemid 34110757)
26. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, et al. Recommendations for quanti fication of doppler echocardiography: a report from the doppler quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and standards committee of the American Society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiography 2002;15:168-84.
27. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the Task Force on prosthetic valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular imaging committee, cardiac imaging committee of the American heart Association, the European Association of echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of echocardiography and the Canadian Society of echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American heart Association, European Association of echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of echocardiography, and Canadian Society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiography 2009;22:975-1014.
28. Sensky PR, Loubani M, Keal RP, et al. Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2003;146:e13.
29. Chambers JB, Rimington HM, Rajani R, et al . A randomized comparison of the Cryolife O 'Brien and Toronto stentless replacement aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1045-50. (Pubitemid 46435925)