Hemodynamic performance of the Ultracor and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses using exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 828-834

  Hobson, Neil A ^a   Wilkinson, Glen A L ^a   Wheeldon, Nigel M ^a   Lynch, Jane ^a  

^a NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DOBUTAMINE;

AGED; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; DOBUTAMINE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 33644875651     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Takeda S, Rimington H, Chambers J. The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. Heart 1999;82:11-14
2. Fries R, Wendier O, Schieffer H, Schafers HJ. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23 mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:817-822
3. Becassis P, Hayot J, Leclercq F, et al. Post operative exercise after aortic valve replacement by small size prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:871-877
4. Nitter-Haug SN, Sene B, Abdelnoor M, Hall KV. A 5-year experience with the Medtronic-Hall disc valve prosthesis. Circulation 1983;68(Suppl.II): II169-II174
5. Wiseth R, Levang O, Tangen G, Rein KA, Skjaerpe T. Exercise hemodynamics in small (<21-mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 1993;15:138-146
6. Strike PC, Edwards TE, Gardier D, Livesey S, Simpson IA. Functional hemodynamics assessment of the 21-mm and 23-mm CarboMedics Top Hat prosthetic valve. J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:99-103
7. Chambers J, Rimington H, Rajani R, Hodson F, Blauth C. Hemodynamic performance on exercise: Comparison of a stentless and stented biological aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:729-733
8. Eriksson MJ, Brodin LA, Dellgren GN, Radegran K. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of an extended stentless aortic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:653-660
9. Kadir I, Izzat MB, Bird I, Wilde P, Reeves B, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Hemodynamics of St. Jude Medical prostheses in the small aortic root: In vivo studies using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:123-129
10. Aris A, Ramirez I, Camara ML, Carreras F, Borras X, Pons-Llado G. The 20 mm Medtronic Hall prosthesis in the small aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:459-462
11. Tatineni S, Hendrick B, Pearson AC, Halbe D, Woodruff R, Labovitz. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Circulation 1989;80(Suppl.I):I16-I23
12. Kenny A, Woods J, Fuller CA, et al. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Monostrut and spherical disc Björk-Shiley aortic valve prosthesis with Doppler echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1025-1028
13. DePaulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F, et al. Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62
14. Baumgartner H, Khan SS, Derobertis M, et al. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. Circulation 1992;85:2275-2283
15. Izzat MB, Birdi I, Wilde P, et al. Evaluation of the haemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses using dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1048-1052
16. Izzat MB, Birdi I, Wilde P, et al. Comparison of haemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:408-415
17. Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gill CC, et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89:358-368
18. MacDonald ML, Daly R, Schaff HV, et al. Haemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: Is there a difference? Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:362-366
19. Jamieson WRE, Janusz MT, MacNab J, Henderson C. Haemodynamic comparison of second and third generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S282-S284
20. Jaffe WM, Coverdale A, Roche AHG, et al. Rest and exercise haemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:167-174
21. Gonzalez- Juanatey JR, Fernandez MV, Sampedro FG, Garcia-Acuna JM, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, Cendon AA, de la Pena MG. Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprosthesis and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots. Heart 1999;82:149-155
22. Donatelli F, Triggiani M, Mariani MA, et al. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of stentless porcine bioprostheses in aortic position. Cardiologia 1994;39:653-660
23. Jewitt D, Birkhead J, Mitchell A, Dollery C. Clinical cardiovascular pharmacology of dobutamine. Lancet 1974;August:364-367
24. Arsenault M, Masani N, Magni G, Yao J, Deras L, Pandian N. Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two dimensional planimetry: Comparison with traditional Doppler data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1931-1937
25. Chambers J, Deverall PB. Limitations and pitfalls in the assessment of prosthetic valves using Doppler ultrasound. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:495-501
26. Takakura H, Sasaki T, Hashimoto K, et al. Haemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:609-613
27. Piabrot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, et al. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:542-546