Hemodynamic performance of stentless versus stented valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 556-564

  Payne, Darrin M ^a,b,c   Pavan Koka, H ^a,b   Karanicolas, Paul J ^a,b   Chu, Michael W ^a   Dave Nagpal, A ^a   Briel, Matthias ^b   Schünemann, Holger J ^b   Lonn, Eva M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY STENT; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS;

EID: 50049123214     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: 15408191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00705.x     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al : Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 29 : 630 634.
2. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al : Left ventricular mass and incidence of coronary heart disease in an elderly cohort: The Framington Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 1989 110 : 101 107.
3. Lund O : Valve replacement for aortic stenosis: The curative potential of early operation. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993 40 (Suppl 1 137.
4. He GW, Grunkemeir GL, Gately HL, et al : Up to 30-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 1995 59 : 1056 1062.
5. Lund O, Kristensen LH, Baandrup U, et al : Myocardial structure as a determinate of pre- and post-ventricular function and long-term prognosis after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 1998 19 : 1099 1108.
6. Monrad ES, Hess OM, Murakami T, et al : Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1988 77 : 1345 1355.
7. Jin XY, Pepper JR : Do stentless valves make a difference? Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 2002 22 : 95 100.
8. Yoganathan AP, Woo YR, Williams FP, et al : In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of Ionescu-Shirley and Carpentier-Edwards tissue bioprosthesis. Artif Organs 1983 7 : 459 469.
9. Luciani GB : Stentless aortic valve replacement: Current status and future trends. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2004 2 (1 127 140.
10. Walkes JCM, Reardon MJ : Current thinking in stentless valve surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003 18 : 117 123.
11. Doty JR, Doty DB : Stentless xenografts for aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003 17 (2 240 251.
12. Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, et al : Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1999 67 (4 966 971.
13. Doss M, Martens S, Wood JP, et al : Performance of stentless versus stented aortic valve bioprostheses in the elderly patient: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003 23 (3 299 304.
14. Sensky PR, Loubani M, Keal RP, et al : Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2003 146 (4 E13.
15. Santini F, Bertolini P, Montalbano G, et al : Hancock versus stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 66 (6 Suppl S99 S103.
16. Cohen G, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, et al : Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2002 73 (3 767 75 discussion 775-8.
17. Perez De Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, et al : Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: Effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 2005 112 (17 2696 2702.
18. Totaro P, Degno N, Zaidi A, et al : Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005 130 : 1668 1674.
19. Jasinski MJ, Ulbrych P, Kolowca M, et al : Early regional assessment of LV mass regression and function after stentless valve replacement: Comparative randomized study. Heart Surgery Forum 2004 7 (5 361 365.
20. Pfannmuller B, Urbanski P, Lindenau K-F, et al : Clinical comparison between the Toronto SPV valve and the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve. Z Herz Thorax Gefasschirurgie 2002 16 (5 213 218.
21. Ennker J, Florath I, Rosendahl U, et al : Risk of perioperative mortality and complications following biological aortic valves replacement in elderly patients: Stented vs. unstented bioprosthesis. Z Kardiol 2001 90 (6 58 64.
22. Dumesnil JG, LeBlanc MH, Cartier PC, et al : Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998 66 : S130 S133.
23. Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G, et al : Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after stentless versus conventional aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999 11 (4 Suppl 1 18 21.
24. Donatelli F, Triggiani M, Mariani MA : Rest and exercise hemodynamics of stentless porcine bioprostheses in aortic position. Cardiologia 1994 39 (1 41 47.
25. Konertz WF : Stentless aortic xenograft heart valves. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Annals 2003 11 (1 1 2.
26. Jasinski MJ, Hayton J, Kadziola Z, et al : Hemodynamic performance after stented vs. stentless aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2002 43 (3 313 317.
27. Melina G, Mitchell MA, Amrani M, et al : Transvalvular velocities after full aortic root replacement: Results from a prospective randomized trial between the homograft and the Medtronic freestyle bioprothesis. J Heart Valve Disease 2002 11 : 54 59.
28. Fries R, Wendler O, Schieffer H, et al : Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000 69 (3 817 22.
29. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, et al : The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999 11 (4 Suppl 1 1 8.
30. Goldman BS, Del Rizzo DF, Christakis GT, et al : Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine bioprosthesis (TSPV). Isr J Med Sci 1996 32 : 846 848.
31. Halstead JC, Tsui SS : Randomized trial of stentless versus stented bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement. Ann of Thorac Surg 2003 76 (4 1338 1339.
32. Horstkotte D : Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann of Thorac Surg 2002 73 (3 778.
33. Williams RJ, Muir DF, Pathi V, et al : Randomized controlled trial of stented and stentless aortic bioprotheses: Hemodynamic performance at 3 years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999 11 (4 Suppl 1 93 7.
34. Eichinger WB, Schutz A, Simmerl D, et al : The Mosiac bioprosthesis in the aortic position: Hemodynamic performance after 2 years. Ann Thorac Surg 1998 66 : S126 S129.
35. Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG, et al : Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996 62 (3 683 690.
36. Shub C, Klein AL, Zachariah PK, et al : Determination of left ventricular mass by echocardiography in a normal population: Effect of age and sex in addition to body size. Mayo Clin Prac 1994 69 : 205 211.