Revealed by conspicuousness: Distractive markings reduce camouflage

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 213-222

  Stevens, Martin ^a   Marshall, Kate L A ^a   Troscianko, Jolyon ^a   Finlay, Sive ^a,b   Burnand, Dan ^a   Chadwick, Sarah L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

camouflage; conspicuousness; distraction; learning; predation; vision

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIRD; COMPUTER; CRYPSIS; FACILITATION; LEARNING; NATURAL SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; SURVIVAL; VISION;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

EID: 84871231628     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars156     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. 2008. Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 59:390-412.
2. Bond AB, Kamil AC. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:3214-3219.
3. Caro T. 2011. The functions of black-and-white coloration in mammals: review and synthesis. In: Stevens M, Merilaita S, editors. Animal camouflage: mechanisms and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 298-329.
4. Chung ST, Levi DM, Legge GE. 2001. Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Res. 41:1833-1850.
5. Cott HB. 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
6. Crawley MJ. 2005. Statistics: an introduction using R. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
7. Cuthill IC, Stevens M, Sheppard J, Maddocks T, Párraga CA, Troscianko TS. 2005. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature. 434:72-74.
8. Cuthill IC, Székely A. 2009. Coincident disruptive coloration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 364:489-496.
9. Dimitrova M, Stobbe N, Schaefer HM, Merilaita S. 2009. Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds. Proc Biol Sci. 276:1905-1910.
10. Fraser S, Callahan A, Klassen D, Sherratt TN. 2007. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability. Proc Biol Sci. 274:1325-1331.
11. Guilford T, Dawkins MS. 1987. Search images not proven: a reappraisal of recent evidence. Anim Behav. 35:1838-1845.
12. Hanlon RT, Chiao CC, Mäthger LM, Barbosa A, Buresch KC, Chubb C. 2009. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 364:429-437.
13. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB. 1988. Adaptive coloration in young cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L.) : the morphology and development of body pattern and their relation to behaviour. Philos T Roy Soc B. 320:437-487.
14. Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC, Bennett AT. 2000. Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.) . J Comp Physiol A. 186:375-387.
15. Hurlbert SH. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr. 54:187-211.
16. Kelman EJ, Baddeley RJ, Shohet AJ, Osorio D. 2007. Perception of visual texture and the expression of disruptive camouflage by the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Proc Biol Sci. 274:1369-1375.
17. Manceau M, Domingues VS, Mallarino R, Hoekstra HE. 2011. The developmental role of Agouti in color pattern evolution. Science. 331:1062-1065.
18. Marples NM, Kelly DJ. 1999. Neophobia and dietary conservatism: two distinct processes? Evol Ecol. 13:641-653.
19. Marples NM, Roper TJ, Harper DGC. 1998. Responses of wild birds to novel prey: evidence of dietary conservatism. Oikos. 83:161-165.
20. Marshall NJ. 2000. Communication and camouflage with the same 'bright' colours in reef fishes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 355:1243-1248.
21. Merilaita S, Lind J. 2005. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc Biol Sci. 272:665-670.
22. Merilaita S, Stevens M. 2011. Crypsis through background matching. In: Stevens M, Merilaita S, editors. Animal camouflage: mechanisms and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 17-33.
23. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www. R-project. org
24. Rosenblum EB, Hoekstra HE, Nachman MW. 2004. Adaptive reptile color variation and the evolution of the Mc1r gene. Evolution. 58:1794-1808.
25. Rosenthal GG. 2007. Spatiotemporal dimensions of visual signals in animal communication. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 38:155-178.
26. Rowland HM, Cuthill IC, Harvey IF, Speed MP, Ruxton GD. 2008. Can't tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland. Proc Biol Sci. 275:2539-2545.
27. Rowland HM, Speed MP, Ruxton GD, Edmunds M, Stevens M, Harvey IF. 2007. Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. Anim Behav. 74:1249-1258.
28. Ruxton GD, Beauchamp G. 2008. Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing. Behav Ecol. 19:690-693.
29. Schaefer HM, Stobbe N. 2006. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching. Proc Biol Sci. 273:2427-2432.
30. Scott-Samuel NE, Baddeley R, Palmer CE, Cuthill IC. 2011. Dazzle camouflage affects speed perception. PLoS ONE. 6:e20233.
31. Steiner CC, Weber JN, Hoekstra HE. 2007. Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biol. 5:e219.
32. Stevens M. 2005. The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally demonstrated in the Lepidoptera. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 80:573-588.
33. Stevens M. 2007. Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proc Biol Sci. 274:1457-1464.
34. Stevens M, Castor-Perry SA, Price JRF. 2009a. The protective value of conspicuous signals is not impaired by shape, size, or position asymmetry. Behav Ecol. 20:96-102.
35. Stevens M, Cuthill IC, Windsor AM, Walker HJ. 2006. Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage. Proc Biol Sci. 273:2433-2438.
36. Stevens M, Graham J, Winney IS, Cantor A. 2008a. Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction? Biol Lett. 4:648-650.
37. Stevens M, Hardman CJ, Stubbins CL. 2008b. Conspicuousness, not eye mimicry, makes "eyespots" effective anti-predator signals. Behav Ecol. 19:525-531.
38. Stevens M, Merilaita S. 2009a. Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 364:481-488.
39. Stevens M, Merilaita S. 2009b. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 364:423-427.
40. Stevens M, Merilaita S. 2011. Animal camouflage: mechanisms and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Stevens M, Searle WT, Seymour JE, Marshall KL, Ruxton GD. 2011. Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses. BMC Biol. 9:81.
42. Stevens M, Stubbins CL, Hardman CJ. 2008c. The anti-predator function of 'eyespots' on camouflaged and conspicuous prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62:1787-1793.
43. Stevens M, Winney IS, Cantor A, Graham J. 2009b. Outline and surface disruption in animal camouflage. Proc Biol Sci. 276:781-786.
44. Stevens M, Yule DH, Ruxton GD. 2008d. Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proc Biol Sci. 275:2639-2643.
45. Stobbe N, Schaefer HM. 2008. Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies. Proc Biol Sci. 275:1535-1541.
46. Thayer GH. 1909. Concealing-coloration in the animal kingdom: an exposition of the laws of disguise through color and pattern: being a summary of Abbott H. Thayer's discoveries. New York: Macmillan.
47. Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 1998. Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc Biol Sci. 265:351-358.
48. Wertheim AH, Hooge IT, Krikke K, Johnson A. 2006. How important is lateral masking in visual search? Exp Brain Res. 170: 387-402.
49. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer.
50. Zylinski S, Osorio D, Shohet AJ. 2009. Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 364:439-448.
51. Zylinski S, Osorio D, Shohet AJ. 2010. Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion. Proc Biol Sci. 276:3963-3969.