Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 364, Issue 1516, 2009, Pages 481-488

  Stevens, Martin ^a   Merilaita, Sami ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Background matching; Camouflage; Crypsis; Dazzle coloration; Disruptive coloration; Predation

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; COLOR; CRYPSIS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PREDATION;

EID: 58249110422     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0216     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Armbruster, J. W. & Page, L. M. 1996 Convergence of a cryptic saddle pattern in benthic freshwater fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 45, 249-257.
2. Barlow, G. W. 1972 The attitude of fish eye-lines in relation to body shape and to stripes and bars. Copeia 1972, 4-12.
3. Beatson, R. R. 1976 Environmental and genetical correlates of disruptive coloration in the water snake, Natrix s. sipedon. Evolution 30, 241-252.
4. Beddard, F. E. 1895 Animal coloration; an account of the principle facts and theories relating to the colours and markings of animals, 2nd edn. London, UK: Swan Sonnenschein.
5. Bohlin, T., Tullberg, B. S. & Merilaita, S. 2008 The effect of signal appearance and distance on detection risk in an aposematic butterfly larva (Parnassius apollo). Anim. Behav. 76, 577-584.
6. Chiao, C., Kelman, E. J. & Hanlon, R. T. 2005 Disruptive body patterning of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) requires visual information regarding edges and contrast of objects in natural substrate backgrounds. Biol. Bull. 208, 7-11.
7. Cott, H. B. 1940 Adaptive coloration in animals. London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
8. Cuthill, I. C. & Székely, A. 2009 Coincident disruptive coloration. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 489-496.
9. Cuthill, I. C., Stevens, M., Sheppard, J., Maddocks, T., Párraga, C. A. & Troscianko, T. S. 2005 Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434, 72-74.
10. Cuthill, I. C., Hiby, E. & Lloyd, E. 2006a The predation costs of symmetrical cryptic coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1267-1271.
11. Cuthill, I. C., Stevens, M., Windsor, A. M. M. & Walker, H. J. 2006b The effects of pattern symmetry on the antipredator effectiveness of disruptive and background matching coloration. Behav. Ecol. 17, 828-832.
12. Edmunds, M. 1974 Defence in animals: a survey of antipredator defences. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Group Ltd.
13. Endler, J. A. 2006 Disruptive and cryptic coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2425-2426.
14. Fraser, S., Callahan, A., Klassen, D. & Sherratt, T. N. 2007 Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1325-1331.
15. Hailman, J. P. 1977 Optical signals: animal communication and light. London, UK: Indiana University Press.
16. Hanlon, R. T. & Messenger, J. B. 1988 Adaptive coloration in young cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L.): the morphology and development of body pattern and their relation to behaviour. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 320, 437-487.
17. Järvi, T., Sillèn-Tullberg, B. & Wiklund, C. 1981 The cost of being aposematic. An experimental study of predation on larvae of Papilio machaon by the great tit Parus major. Oikos 36, 267-272.
18. Kelman, E. J., Tiptus, P. & Osorio, D. 2006 Juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) produce camouflage by flexibly combining two separate patterns. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3288-3292.
19. Kelman, E., Baddeley, R., Shohet, A. & Osorio, D. 2007 Perception of visual texture, and the expression of disruptive camouflage by the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1369-1375.
20. Merilaita, S. 1998 Crypsis through disruptive coloration in an isopod. Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 1059-1064.
21. Merilaita, S. & Lind, J. 2005 Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 665-670.
22. Merilaita, S. & Lind, J. 2006 Great tits (Parus major) searching for artificial prey: implications for cryptic coloration and symmetry. Behav. Ecol. 17, 84-87.
23. Osorio, D. & Srinivasan, M. V. 1991 Camouflage by edge enhancement in animal coloration patterns and its implications for visual mechanisms. Proc. R. Soc. B 244, 81-85.
24. Poulton, E. B. 1890 The colours of animals: their meaning and use. Especially considered in the case of insects. The international scientific series, 2nd edn. London, UK: Kegan Paul, Trench Trübner, & Co. Ltd.
25. Rowland, H. M. 2009 From Abbott Thayer to the present day: what have we learned about the function of countershading? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 519-527.
26. Rowland, H. M., Speed, M. P., Ruxton, G. D., Edmunds, M., Stevens, M. & Harvey, I. F. 2007 Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. Anim. Behav. 74, 1249-1258.
27. Schaefer, M. H. & Stobbe, N. 2006 Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2427-2432.
28. Sherratt, T. N., Rashed, A. & Beatty, C. D. 2005 Hiding in plain sight. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 414-416.
29. Stevens, M. 2007 Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1457-1464.
30. Stevens, M. & Cuthill, I. C. 2006 Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2141-2147.
31. Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. 2009 Introduction. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 423-427.
32. Stevens, M., Cuthill, I. C., Párraga, C. A. & Troscianko, T. 2006a The effectiveness of disruptive coloration as a concealment strategy. In Progress in brain research (eds J.-M. Alonso, S. Macknik, L. Martinez, P. Tse & S. Martinez-Conde), pp. 49-65. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
33. Stevens, M., Cuthill, I. C., Windsor, A. M. M. & Walker, H. J. 2006b Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2433-2438.
34. Stevens, M., Yule, D. H. & Ruxton, G. D. 2008 Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2639-2643.
35. Stevens, M., Graham, J., Winney, I. S. & Cantor, A. In press. Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction? Biol. Lett.
36. Stobbe, N. & Schaefer, H. M. 2008 Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1535-1541.
37. Stoner, C. J., Caro, T. M. & Graham, C. M. 2003 Ecological and behavioural correlates of coloration in artiodactyls: systematic analyses of conventional hypotheses. Behav. Ecol. 14, 823-840.
38. Thayer, G. H. 1909 Concealing-coloration in the animal kingdom: an exposition of the laws of disguise through color and pattern: being a summary of Abbott H. Thayer's discoveries. New York, NY: Macmillan.
39. Tullberg, B. S., Merilaita, S. & Wiklund, C. 2005 Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1315-1321.
40. Wallace, A. R. 1889 Darwinism. An exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. London, UK: Macmillan & Co.
41. Wilkinson, D. M. & Sherratt, T. N. 2008 The art of concealment. Biologist 55, 10-15.