Using visual information for grounding and awareness in collaborative tasks

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-39

  Gergle, Darren ^a,d   Kraut, Robert E ^b   Fussell, Susan R ^c,e  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^d Northwestern University   (United States)

^e Social Dynamics Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE TASKS; COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; COORDINATION PROCESS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FUTURE DESIGNS; SITUATION AWARENESS; THEORY DEVELOPMENT; VIEWING AREA; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EXPERIMENTS;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84871211624     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2012.678246     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E. H., Doherty, G. M., Garrod, S. C., Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language & Speech, 34, 351-366.
2. Bolstad, C. A., & Endsley, M. R. (1999). Shared mental models and shared displays: An empirical evaluation of team performance. Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society. Houston, TX: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3. Boyle, E. A., Anderson, A. H., & Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue and performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language & Speech, 37, 1-20.
4. Brennan, S. E. (1990). Seeking and providing evidence for mutual understanding (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
5. Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. C. Trueswell&M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 95-129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking whilemonitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 62-81.
9. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
11. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
12. Cohen, K. (1982). Speaker interaction: Video teleconferences versus face-to-face meetings. Proceedings of the Teleconferencing and Electronic Communications. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Convertino, G., Mentis, H. M., Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M., Slavkovic, A., & Ganoe, C. H. (2008). Articulating common ground in cooperative work: Content and process. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008). New York, NY: ACM Press.
14. Convertino, G.,Mentis,H.M., Rosson,M. B., Slavkovic, A.,& Carroll, J.M. (2009). Supporting content and process common ground in computer-supported teamwork. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009). New York, NY: ACM Press.
15. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
16. Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A., & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: Fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 21-58.
17. Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A. O'Malley, C. & Langton, S., Garrod, S., & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialog structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 105-125.
18. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
19. Endsley, M. R., & Garland, D. J. (2000). Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Fussell, S. R., Kraut, R. E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2000). New York, NY: ACM Press.
21. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., & Kraut, R. E. (2003). Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003). New York, NY: ACM Press.
22. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2004a). Action as language in a shared visual space. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork (CSCW 2004). New York, NY: ACM Press.
23. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2004b). Language efficiency and visual technology: Minimizing collaborative effort with visual information. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 23, 491-517.
24. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2006). The impact of delayed visual feedback on collaborative performance. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006). New York, NY: ACM Press.
25. Gergle, D., Millen,D. E., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2004). Persistence matters: Making the most of chat in tightly-coupled work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004). New York, NY: ACM Press.
26. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 411-446.
27. Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1992). New York, NY: ACM Press.
28. Hupet,M., Seron, X., &Chantraine, Y. (1991). The effects of the codability and discriminability of the referents on the collaborative referring procedure. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 449-462.
29. Karsenty, L. (1999). Cooperative work and shared context: An empirical study of comprehension problems in side by side and remote help dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 283-315.
30. Krauss, R. M., & Bricker, P. D. (1967). Effects of transmission delay and access delay on the efficiency of verbal communication. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 286-292.
31. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 137-164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human Computer Interaction, 18, 13-49.
33. Kraut, R. E., Gergle, D., & Fussell, S. R. (2002). The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: Informing the development of virtual co-presence. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2002). New York, NY: ACM Press.
34. Kraut, R. E., Miller,M. D., & Siegel, J. (1996). Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: Effects on outcomes and communication. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1996). New York, NY: ACM Press.
35. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Monk, A., & Watts, L. (2000). Peripheral participation in video-mediated communication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 933-958.
37. Nardi, B., Schwarz, H., Kuchinsky, A., Leichner, R., Whittaker, S., & Sclabassi, R. T. (1993). Turning away from talking heads: The use of video-as-data in neurosurgery. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERCHI 1993). New York, NY: ACM Press.
38. Nardi, B., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face to face communication in distributed work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. O'Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., & Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 389-428.
40. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-178.
41. Ranjan, A., Birnholtz, J. P., & Balakrishnan, R. (2007). Dynamic shared visual spaces: Experimenting with automatic camera control in a remote repair task. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007). New York, NY: ACM Press.
42. Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47, 1-24.
43. Schober, M. F. (1995). Speakers, addressees, and frames of reference: Whose effort is minimized in conversations about locations. Discourse Processes, 20, 219-247.
44. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: Wiley.
45. Snook, S. A. (2000). Friendly fire: The accidental shootdown of U. S. Blackhawks over northern Iraq (Vol. 280). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Velichkovsky, B. (1995). Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmatics & Cognition, 3, 199-224.
47. Whittaker, S. (2003). Things to talk about when talking about things. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 149-170.
48. Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E., & Robinson, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: How do they work and when are they useful? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 813-842.
49. Whittaker, S., & O'Conaill, B. (1997). The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B.Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication (pp. 23-49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976