Language efficiency and visual technology - Minimizing collaborative effort with visual information

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 491-517

  Gergle, Darren ^a   Kraut, Robert E ^a   Fussell, Susan R ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Communication; Computer supported collaborative work; Discourse; Shared visual space

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044287181     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X04269589     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barnard, P., May, J., & Salber, D. (1996). Deixis and points of view in media spaces: An empirical gesture. Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 37-50.
3. Boyle, E. A., Anderson, A. H., & Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue and performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language & Speech, 37, 1-20.
4. Brennan, S. E. (in press). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), World situated language use: Psycholinguistic, linguistic and computational perspectives on bridging the product and action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., & Weeks, G. D. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors, 14, 487-509.
6. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA.
8. Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 62-81.
9. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In B. L. Webber, A. K. Joshi, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 1063). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
11. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors Special Issue: Situation Awareness, 37, 32-64.
12. Fussell, S. R., Kraut, R. E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (CSCW), 2(3), 21-30.
13. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., & Kraut, R. E. (2003). Effects of head-mounted and sceneoriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), 5(1), 513-520.
14. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., & Parker, E. M. (2003). Where do helpers look? Gaze targets during collaborative physical tasks. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (Extended Abstracts), 5(1), 768-769.
15. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E. M., & Kramer, A. (2004). Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 273-309.
16. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (in press). Action as language in a shared visual space. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). New York: ACM Press.
17. Gergle, D., Millen, D., Kraut, R., & Fussell, S. (2004). Persistence matters: Making the most of chat in tightly-coupled work. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 6(1), 431-438.
18. Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
19. Krauss, R. M., & Bricker, P. D. (1967). Effects of transmission delay on the efficiency of verbal communication. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 41, 286-292.
20. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human Computer Interaction, 18, 13-49.
22. Kraut, R. E., Gergle, D., & Fussell, S. R. (2002). The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: Informing the development of virtual co-presence. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (CSCW), 4(3), 31-40.
23. Nardi, B. A., Schwarz, H., Kuchinsky, A., Leichner, R., Whittaker, S., & Sclabassi, R. (1993). Turning away from talking heads: The use of video-as-data in neurosurgery. In S. Ashlund, K. Mullet, A. Henderson, E. Hollnagel, & T. White (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (pp. 327-334). New York: ACM Press.
24. Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47, 1-24.
25. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
26. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.