Calibration and confidence: Where to next?

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 62-66

  Hattie, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Calibration; Confidence; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871024972     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ausubel D.P. Educational psychology: A cognitive view 1968, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory 1986, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
3. Connolly S.R., Klenowski V., Wyatt-Smith C. Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement: teachers' views. British Educational Research Journal 2011, 30(1):1-22. 10.1080/01411926.2011.569006.
4. Cooksey R.W. Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications 1996, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. Crissman, J. K. (2006). The design and utilization of effective worked examples: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
6. Cronbach L.J., Furby L. How we should measure "change" - or should we?. Psychological Bulletin 1970, 74:68-80. 10.1037/h0029382.
7. Dinsmore D.L., Parkinson M.M. What are confidence judgments made of? Students' explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration. Learning and Instruction 2013, 24:4-14.
8. Hadwin A.F., Webster E.A. Calibration in goal setting: examining the nature of judgments of confidence. Learning and Instruction 2013, 24:37-47.
9. Hattie J.A.C. Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement 2009, Routledge, Oxford, UK.
10. Hattie J.A.C. Visible learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on achievement 2012, Routledge, Oxford, UK.
11. Hattie J.A.C., Brown G.T., Keegan P. A national teacher-managed, curriculum-based assessment system: Assessment Tools for Teaching & Learning (asTTle). International Journal of Learning 2005, 10:770-778.
12. Hattie J.A., Fletcher R.B. Self-esteem=success/pretensions: assessing pretensions/importance in self-esteem. International advances in self research 2006, Vol. II. Information Age Publishers, Charlotte, NC.
13. Hattie J.A.C., Gan M. Instruction based on feedback. Handbook of research on learning and instruction 2011, 249-271. Routledge, New York. R.H. Mayer, P.A. Alexander (Eds.).
14. Kane T.J., Staiger D.O. Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains 2012, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. http://metproject.org/downloads/MET_Gathering_Feedback_Practioner_Brief.pdf.
15. Kuncel N.R., Crede M., Thomas L.L. The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research 2005, 75(1):63-82. 10.3102/00346543075001063.
16. van Loon M.H., de Bruin A.B.H., van Gog T., van Merrienboer J.J.G. Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students' metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction 2013, 24:15-25.
17. Lord F.M. The measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1956, 16:321-437. 10.1177/001316445601600401.
18. Mabe P.A., West S.G. Validity of self-evaluation of ability: a review and meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 1982, 67(3):280-296. 10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280.
19. Piaget J. The language and thought of the child 1962, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
20. Sadler R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 1989, 18:119-144. 10.1007/BF00117714.
21. Schraw G., Kuch F., Gutierrez A.P. Measure for measure: calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores. Learning and Instruction 2013, 24:48-57.
22. Shuford E.H., Brown T.A. Elicitation of personal probabilities and their assessment. Instructional Science 1975, 4:137-188. 10.1007/BF00051729.
23. Smith, S. L. (2009). Academic target setting: Formative use of achievement data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
24. Wainer H., Thissen D. How is reliability related to the quality of test scores? What is the effect of local dependence on reliability?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1996, 15(1):22-29. 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1996.tb00803.
25. Wang M.W., Stanley J.C. Differential weighting: a review of methods and empirical studies. Review of Educational Research 1970, 40(5):663-705. 10.3102/00346543040005663.
26. Warrens M.J. Similarity coefficients for binary data 2008, Proefschriftmaken, Oisterwijk, Netherlands, Retrieved from. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/12987/Full?sequence=2.
27. Wyatt-Smith C., Klenowski V., Gunn S. The centrality of teachers' judgement practice in assessment: a study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 2010, 17(1):59-75. 10.1080/09695940903565610.