Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement: Teachers' views

British Educational Research Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 593-614

  Connolly, Stephen ^a   Klenowski, Valentina ^a   Wyatt Smith, Claire Maree ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863855513     PISSN: 01411926     EISSN: 14693518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01411926.2011.569006     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Adie, L. (2010) Developing shared understandings of standards-based assessment: online moderation practices across geographically diverse contexts. Ph.D. thesis, QUT.
2. Bazeley, P. 2007. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo, Los Angeles: SAGE.
3. Cooksey, R., Freebody, P. and Wyatt-Smith, C. 2007. Assessment as judgment-in-context: analysing how teachers evaluate students' writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(5): 401-434.
4. Creswell, J. 2008. Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
5. Davison, C. 2004. The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 21(3): 305-334.
6. Klenowski, V. (2006) Evaluation report of the pilot of the 2005 Queensland Assessment Task (QAT). Available online at: http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/research/reports.html (accessed 17 January 2010).
7. Klenowski, V. (2007) Evaluation of the effectiveness of the consensus-based standards validation process. Available online at: http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/html/lce_eval.html (accessed 2 February 2010).
8. Klenowski, V. and Adie, L. 2009. Moderation as judgement practice: reconciling system-level accountability and local-level practice. Curriculum Perspectives, 29(1): 10-28.
9. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
10. Maxwell, G. 2009. "Defining standards for the twenty-first century". In Educational assessment in the twenty-first century, Edited by: Wyatt-Smith, C.M. and Cumming, J.J. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
11. Miles, M. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Queensland Studies Authority (QSA). (2005) Moderation processes for senior certification. (Brisbane, Australia, Queensland Studies Authority).
13. QSA. (2007) Information statement February 2007: essential learnings draft 2. (Brisbane, Australia, Queensland Studies Authority).
14. Sadler, D.R. 2005. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2): 175-194.
15. Sadler, D.R. 2009. Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2): 159-179.
16. Saldaña, J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, London: SAGE.
17. Simons, H. 2009. Case study research in practice, Los Angeles: SAGE.
18. Wyatt-Smith, C.M. 1999. Reading for assessment: how teachers ascribe meaning and value to student writing. Assessment in Education, 6(2): 195-223.
19. Wyatt-Smith, C. and Castleton, G. 2004. Factors affecting writing achievement: mapping teacher beliefs. English in Education, 38(1): 37-61.
20. Wyatt-Smith, C. and Castleton, G. 2005. Examining how teachers judge student writing: an Australian case study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2): 131-154.
21. Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V. and Gunn, S.J. 2010. The centrality of teachers' judgement practice in assessment: a study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education, 17(1): 59-76.