Functional hemispheric asymmetries of global/local processing mirrored by the steady-state visual evoked potential

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 161-166

  Martens, Ulla ^a   Hübner, Ronald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

EEG; Global local; Hemispheric differences; Object perception; SSVEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84871022858     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Boles D.B., Karner T.A. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing: Still unclear. Brain and Cognition 1996, 30:232-243.
2. Christman S. Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research. Brain and Cognition 1989, 11(2):238-257.
3. Dalrymple K.A., Kingstone A., Handy T.C. Event-related potential evidence for a dual-locus model of global/local processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2009, 26(5):456-470.
4. Evans M.A., Shedden J.M., Hevenor S.J., Hahn M.C. The effect of variability of unattended information on global and local processing: Evidence for lateralization at early stages of processing. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(3):225-239.
5. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A., Buchner A. G^* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39(2):175.
6. Flevaris A.V., Bentin S., Robertson L.C. Local or global? attentional selection of spatial frequencies binds shapes to hierarchical levels. Psychological Science 2010, 21(3):424-431. 10.1177/0956797609359909.
7. Flevaris A.V., Bentin S., Robertson L.C. Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: Evidence from EEG. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(7). 10.1167/11.7.11.
8. Gruber T., Müller M.M. Oscillatory brain activity dissociates between associative stimulus content in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(1):109-116.
9. Han S., Liu W., Yund E.W., Woods D.L. Interactions between spatial attention and global/local feature selection: An ERP study. Neuroreport 2000, 11(12):2753-27588.
10. Heinze H.J., Hinrichs H., Scholz M., Burchert W., Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of global and local processing: A combined PET and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10(4):485-498.
11. Heinze H.J., Münte T.F. Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31(8):841-852.
12. Hellige J.B. Hemispheric asymmetry for visual information processing. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 1996, 56:485-497.
13. Henson R., Shallice T., Dolan R. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 2000, 287(5456):1269.
14. Henson R.N.A., Rugg M.D. Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(3):263-270.
15. Hübner R., Kruse R. Effects of stimulus type and level repetition on content-level binding in global/local processing. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:1. doi: 10.2289/fpsyg.2011.00134.
16. Hübner R., Malinowski P. The effect of response competition on functional hemispheric asymmetries for global/local processing. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64(8):1290-1300.
17. Hübner R., Volberg G. The integration of object levels and their content: A theory of global/local processing and related hemispheric differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(3):520.
18. Junghöfer M., Elbert T., Tucker D.M., Rockstroh B. Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 2000, 37(04):523-532.
19. Kaspar K., Hassler U., Martens U., Trujillo-Barreto N., Gruber T. Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition. Brain Research 2010, 1343:112-121. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.072.
20. Kimchi R. Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112(1):24.
21. Lamb M.R., Robertson L.C. The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1988, 44(2):172-181.
22. Malinowski P., Hübner R., Keil A., Gruber T. The influence of response competition on cerebral asymmetries for processing hierarchical stimuli revealed by ERP recordings. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 144(1):136-139.
23. Martens U., Gruber T. Sharpening and formation: Two distinct neuronal mechanisms of repetition priming. European Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 36:2989-2995. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08222.x.
24. Martens U., Trujillo Barreto N., Gruber T. Perceiving the tree in the woods: Segregating brain responses to stimuli constituting natural scenes. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(48):17713-17718.
25. Morgan S.T., Hansen J.C., Hillyard S.A. Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1996, 93(10):4770.
26. Müller M.M., Andersen S., Trujillo N.J., Valdés-Sosa P., Malinowski P., Hillyard S.A. Feature-selective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103(38):14250-14254.
27. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 9(3):353-383.
28. Peyrin C., Chauvin A., Chokron S., Marendaz C. Hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes. Brain and Cognition 2003, 53(2):278-282.
29. Roalf D., Lowery N., Turetsky B.I. Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing. Brain and Cognition 2006, 60(1):32-42.
30. Robertson L.C., Ivry R. Hemispheric asymmetries. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2000, 9(2):59.
31. Romei V., Driver J., Schyns P.G., Thut G. Rhythmic TMS over parietal cortex links distinct brain frequencies to global versus local visual processing. Current Biology 2011, 21(4):334-337.
32. Silberstein R.B., Nunez P.L., Pipingas A., Harris P., Danieli F. Steady state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) topography in a graded working memory task. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2001, 42(2):219-232.
33. Stoffer T.H. Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: Effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset. Psychological Research 1994, 56(2):83-98.
34. Van Kleeck M.H. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia 1989, 27(9):1165-1178.
35. Volberg G., Hübner R. On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(13):1805-1813.
36. Volberg G., Hübner R. Do the hemispheres differ in their preparation for global/local processing?. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 176(3):525-531.
37. Weissman D.H., Woldorff M.G. Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(6):870.
38. Yamaguchi S., Yamagata S., Kobayashi S. Cerebral asymmetry of the" top-down" allocation of attention to global and local features. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20(9):72.
39. Yovel G., Yovel I., Levy J. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: Effects of stimulus and task factors* 1. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(6):1369-1385.