Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing: Still unclear

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 232-243

  Boles, David B ^a   Karner, Thomas A ^b  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030110955     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0015     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alivasatos, B., & Wilding, J. 1982. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli. Cortex, 18, 5-21.
2. Barnes, S., & Burke, R. S. 1988. What is Apple-Psych? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 150-154.
3. Blanca, M. J., Zalabardo, C., Garcia-Criado, F., & Siles, R. 1994. Hemispheric differences in global and local processing dependent on exposure duration. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1343-1351.
4. Blanca Mena, M. J. 1992. Can certain stimulus characteristics influence the hemispheric differences in global and local processing? Acta Psychologica, 79, 201-217.
5. Boles, D. B. 1983. Hemispheric interaction in visual field asymmetry. Cortex, 19, 99-113.
6. Boles, D. B. 1984a. Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy? Neuropsychologia, 22, 445-455.
7. Boles, D. B. 1984b. Sex in lateralized tachistoscopic word recognition. Brain and Language, 23, 307-317.
8. Boles, D. B. 1987. Reaction time asymmetry through bilateral vs. unilateral stimulus presentation. Brain and Cognition, 6, 321-333.
9. Boles, D. B. 1989. Do visual field asymmetries intercorrelate? Neuropsychologia, 27, 697-704.
10. Boles, D. B. 1990. What bilateral displays do. Brain & Cognition, 12, 205-228.
11. Boles, D. B. 1991. Factor analysis and the cerebral hemispheres: Pilot study and parietal functions. Neuropsychologia, 29, 59-91.
12. Boles, D. B. 1992. Factor analysis and the cerebral hemispheres: Temporal, occipital and frontal functions. Neuropsychologia, 30, 963-988.
13. Boles, D. B. 1994. An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry. Brain and Cognition, 24, 184-197.
14. Boles, D. B. 1995. Parameters of the bilateral effect. In F. L. Kitterle (Ed)., Hemispheric communication: mechanisms and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
15. Boles, D. B., & Morelli, M. L. 1988. Hemispheric sensitivity to spatial frequencies. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 552-555.
16. Boles, D. B., & Rashid, R. 1993. Spatial frequency masking of lateralized word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 563-565.
17. Delis, D. C., Robertson, L. C., & Efron, R. 1986. Hemipsheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 24, 205-214.
18. Doyon, J., & Milner, B. 1991. Right temporal-lobe contribution to global visual processing. Neuropsychologia, 29, 343-360.
19. Hellige, J. B. 1980. Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 639-651.
20. Jonsson, J. E., & Hellige, J. B. 1986. Lateralized effects of blurring: A test of the visual spatial frequency model of cerebral hemisphere asymmetry. Neuropsychologia, 24, 351-362.
21. Lamb, M. R., & Robertson, L. C. 1988. The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(2), 172-181.
22. Lamb, M. R., & Robertson, L. C. 1989. Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information? Perception & Psychophysics, 46(3), 254-258.
23. Lamb, M. R., Robertson, L. C., & Knight, R. T. 1990. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: Inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 471-483.
24. Martin, M. 1979. Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing. Neuropsychologia, 17, 33-40.
25. Navon, D. 1977. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
26. Navon, D., & Norman, J. 1983. Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(6), 955-965.
27. Osgood, G. 1988. Generalizing the Apple-Psych system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 155-157.
28. Segalowitz, S. J. 1986. Validity and reliability of noninvasive lateralization measures. In J. E. Obrzut, & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Child neuropsychology. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
29. Sergent, J. 1982a. The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 253-272.
30. Sergent, J. 1982b. Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 451-461.
31. Van Kleeck, M. H. 1989. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1165-1178.