Event-related potential evidence for a dual-locus model of global/local processing

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 456-470

  Dalrymple, Kirsten A ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^a   Handy, Todd C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Event related potentials; Global local processing; Hierarchical stimuli

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77949371175     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290903444582     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Clavagnier, S., Fruhmann Berger, M., Klockgether, T., Moskau, S., & Karnath, H.-O. (2006). Restricted ocular exploration does not seem to explain simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2330-2336.
2. Coles, M.,& Rugg, M. (1995). Event-related potentials: An introduction. In M. Rugg & M. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Dalrymple, K. A., Kingstone, A., & Barton, J. (2007). Seeing trees OR seeing forests in simultanagnosia: Attentional capture can be local or global. Neuropsychologia, 45, 871-875.
4. Enns, J., & Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283-291.
5. Huberle, E., & Karnath, H.-O. (2006). Global shape recognition is modulated by the spatial distance of local elements: Evidence from simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 905-911.
6. Karnath, H.-O., Ferber, S., Rorden, C., & Driver, J. (2000). The fate of global information in dorsal simultanagnosia. Neurocase, 6, 295-306.
7. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 24-38.
8. Kinchla, R., & Wolfe, J. (1979). The order of visual processing: "Top-down," "bottom-up," or "middle-out". Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 1-10.
9. Kramer, A., & Strayer, D. (1988). Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biological Psychology, 26, 231-267.
10. Mangun,G. R.,&Hillyard, S. A. (1991).Modulations of sensory-evoled brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 1057-1074.
11. Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7(6), 476-484.
12. Moreaud, O. (2003). Balint syndrome. Archives of Neurology, 60, 1329-1331.
13. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
14. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15. Rafal, R. (2003). Balint's syndrome: A disorder of visual cognition. In M. D'Esposito (Ed.), Neurological foundations of cognitive neuroscience (pp. 27-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Rizzo, M., & Vecera, S. (2002). Psychoanatomical substrates of Balint's syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72, 162-178.
17. Senkowski, D.,&Herrmann,C. S. (2002). Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1742-1753.
18. Shalev, L., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. (2007). Local capture in Balint's syndrome: Effects of grouping and item familiarity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(1), 115-127.
19. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. Koster (Ed.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North Holland.
20. Treisman,A.,&Gelade, G. (1980).A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
21. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005). Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(3), 165-181.
22. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203.
23. Volberg, G., & Hübner, R. (2004). On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1805-1813.