Effects of stimulus type and level repetition on content-level binding in global/local processing

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue JUN, 2011, Pages

  Hübner, Ronald ^a   Kruse, Rana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conjunction errors; Feature binding; Global local processing; Visual field effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867082684     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00134     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Doricchi, F., and Incoccia, C. (1998). Seeing only the right half of the forest but cutting down all the trees? Nature 394, 75-78.
2. Flevaris, A. V., Bentin, S., and Robertson, L. C. (2010). Local or global? Attentional selection of spatial frequencies binds shapes to hierarchical levels. Psychol. Sci. 21, 424-431
3. Flevaris, A. V., Bentin, S., and Robertson, L. C. (2011). Attention to hierarchical level influences attentional selection of spatial scale. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 12-22.
4. Hübner, R. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Percept. Psychophys. 59, 187-201.
5. Hübner, R. (2000). Attention shifting between global and local target levels: the persistence of level-repetition effects. Vis. Cogn. 7, 465-484.
6. Hübner, R., and Malinowski, P. (2002). The effect of response competition on functional hemispheric asymmetries for global/local processing. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1290-1300.
7. Hübner, R., and Studer, T. (2009). Functional hemispheric differences for the categorization of global and local information in naturalistic stimuli. Brain Cogn. 69, 11-18.
8. Hübner, R., and Volberg, G. (2005). The integration of object levels and their content: a theory of global/local processing and related hemispheric differences. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 520-541.
9. Hübner, R., Volberg, G., and Studer, T. (2007). Hemispheric differences for global/local processing in divided attention tasks: further evidence for the integration theory. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 413-421.
10. Hughes, H. C., Nozawa, G., and Kitterle, F. (1996). Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 197-230.
11. Ivry, R. B., and Robertson, L. C. (1998). The Two Sides of Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Kim, N., Ivry, R. B., and Robertson, L. C. (1999). Sequential priming in hierarchically organized figures: effects of target level and target resolution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 715-729.
13. Lamb, M. R., and Yund, E. W. (1996). Spatial frequency and attention: effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms. Percept. Psychophys. 58, 363-373.
14. Lamb, M. R., Yund, E. W., and Pond, H. M. (1999). Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128, 88-94.
15. Lovegrove, W. J., and Pepper, K. (1994). "The influence of low-level processing in the global precedence effect," in Cognitive Approches to Human Perception, ed. S. Ballesteros (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum), 71-90.
16. Malinowski, P., Hübner, R., Keil, A., and Gruber, T. (2002). The influence of response competition on cerebral asymmetries for processing hierarchical stimuli revealed by ERP recordings. Exp. Brain Res. 144, 136-139
17. May, J. G., Gutierrez, C., and Harsin, C. A. (1995). The time-course of global precedence and consistency effects. Int. J. Neurosci. 80, 237-245.
18. Miller, J., and Navon, D. (2002). Global precedence and response activation: evidence from LRPs. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 55, 289-310.
19. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before the trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353-393.
20. Robertson, L. C. (1996). Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125, 227-249.
21. Robertson, L. C., Egly, R., Lamb, M. R., and Kerth, L. (1993). Spatial attention and cuing to global and locallevels of hierarchical structure. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19, 471-487.
22. Treisman, A., and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn. Psychol. 12, 97-136.
23. Treisman, A., and Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 107-141.
24. Van Kleeck, M. H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia 27, 1165-1178.
25. Volberg, G., and Hübner, R. (2004). On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 42, 1805-1813.
26. Yovel, G., Yovel, I., and Levy, J. (2001). Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 1369-1385.