Impact of river bed morphology on discharge and water levels simulated by a 1D Saint-Venant hydraulic model at regional scale

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 476, Issue , 2013, Pages 169-177

  Saleh, F ^a,b   Ducharne, A ^a   Flipo, N ^b   Oudin, L ^a   Ledoux, E ^b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

1D Saint Venant; Hydraulics; Hydrology; Regional scale; River morphology; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

BED-LEVEL; CHANNEL GEOMETRY; CONTROL POINT; CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPE; DEGRADED CHANNEL; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FLOOD FORECAST; HEC-RAS; HIGH RESOLUTION; HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL; HYDROGRAPHS; LOGICAL MODELS; MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT; MAPPING APPLICATIONS; PARAMETERIZED; REGIONAL SCALE; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; RIVER BED; RIVER GEOMETRY; RIVER MORPHOLOGY; RIVER STAGES; SAINT-VENANT; UNSTEADY HYDRAULICS; WATER DEPTH; WIDE SPECTRUM;

FLOOD CONTROL; FLUID DYNAMICS; GEOMETRY; HYDRAULIC MODELS; HYDRAULICS; HYDROLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING; RIVERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER LEVELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FLOOD FORECASTING; GEOMETRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDRAULICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROGEOLOGY; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; RIVER BED; RIVER DISCHARGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLOPE; WATER LEVEL;

FRANCE; SEINE RIVER;

EID: 84870976873     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arora V.K., Boer G.J. A variable velocity flow routing algorithm for GCMs. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104(D24):30965-30979.
2. Arora V.K., Seglenieks F., Kouwen N., Soulis E. Scaling aspects of river flow routing. Hydrol. Process. 2001, 15(3):461-477.
3. Bailly J.-S., Le Coarer Y., Languille P., Stigermark C.-J., Allouis T. Geostatistical estimations of bathymetric LiDAR errors on rivers. Earth Surf. Process. Land. 2010, 35(10):1199-1210.
4. Barkau, R.L., 1985. A Mathematical Model of Unsteady Flow Through a Dendritic Network, Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University, Collins, CO.
5. Barré de Saint-Venant, 1871. Théorie du mouvement nonpermanent des eaux, avec application aux crues des rivières et à l'introduction des marées dans leur lit. C.R. [Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences. Paris.] 73, 147-154, 237-240..
6. Bates P.D., Marks K.J., Horritt M.S. Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrol. Process. 2003, 17(3):537-557.
7. Bathurst J.C. Flow processes and data provision for channel flow models. Modelling Geomorphological Systems 1988, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
8. Becker, A., Serban, P., 1990. Hydrological Models for Water-Resources Systems Design and Operation. WMO Operational Hydrology Report No. 34.
9. Benito G., Sánchez-Moya Y., Sopeña A. Sedimentology of high-stage flood deposits of the Tagus River, Central Spain. Sediment. Geol. 2003, 157(1-2):107.
10. Brunner G.W. HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual 2008, US Army Corps of Engineers, CA Davis.
11. Brunner, G.W., 2008b. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System User's Manual., US Army Corps of Engineers. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis.
12. Chow V.T. Open Channel Hydraulics 1959, McGraw Hill Company Inc., New York.
13. Coe M. A linked global model of terrestrial hydrologic processes: simulation of modern rivers, lakes and wetlands. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103:8885-8899.
14. Cook A., Merwade V. Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. J. Hydrol. 2009, 377(1-2):131-142.
15. Cunge J.A. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method, (Muskingum Method). J. Hydraulic Res. 1969, 7(2):205-230.
16. Cunge, J.A., Holly, F.M., Verwey, A., 1980. Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics Pitman Publishing Ltd. London, (17 CUN).
17. Ducharne A., Golaz C., Leblois E., Laval K., Polcher J., Ledoux E., de Marsily G. Development of a high resolution runoff routing model, calibration and application to assess runoff from the LMD GCM. J. Hydrol. 2003, 280:207-228.
18. Durand M., Rodriguez E., Alsdorf D.E., Trigg M. Estimating river depth from remote sensing swath interferometry measurements of river height, slope, and width. IEEE JSTARS 2010, 3(1).
19. Fekete B., Vörösmarty C., Lammers R. Scaling gridded river networks for macroscale hydrology: development, analysis, and control of error. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37(7):1955-1967.
20. Flipo N., Even S., Poulin M., Théry S., Ledoux E. Modeling nitrate fluxes at the catchment scale using the integrated tool CAWAQS. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 375:69-79.
21. Flipo, N., Monteil, C., Poulin, M., de Fouquet, C., Krimissa, M., 2012. Hybrid fitting of a hydrosystem model: Long term insight into the Beauce aquifer functioning (France). Water Resour. Res., 48, W05509. doi: 10.1029/2011WR011092.
22. Fonstad M., Marcus W. Remote sensing of stream depths with hydraulically assisted bathymetry (HAB) models. Geomorphology 2005, 72(1-4):107-120.
23. Gomez, E., Ledoux, E., Viennot, P., Mignolet, C., Benoit, M., Bornerand, C., Schott, C., Mary, B., Billen, G., Ducharne, A., Brunstein, D., 2003. Un outil de modélisation intégrée du transfert des nitrates sur un système hydrologique: application au bassin de la Seine. La, Houille Blanche, No. 3/2003.
24. Graff W., Altinakar M.S. Ecoulement nonpermanent et phenomenes de transport 1996, Presse Polytechnique et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.
25. Hagemann S., Dumenil L. A parameterization of lateral water flow for the global scale. J. Clim. Dynam. 1998, 14:17-41.
26. Jenson K., Domingue J.O. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographical information system analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 1988, 54(11):1593-1600.
27. Knebl M.R., Yang Z.L., Hutchison K., Maidment D.R. Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. J. Environ. Manage. 2005, 75:325-336.
28. Kuta R.W., Annable W.K., Tolson B.A. Sensitivity of field data estimates in one-dimensional hydraulic modeling of channels. J. Hydraulic Eng. 2010, 136(6).
29. Ledoux, E., Girard, G., Villeneuve, J.P., 1984. Proposition d'un modèle couplé pour la simulation conjointe des écoulements de surface et des écoulements souterrains sur un bassin hydrologique. La Houille Blanche, 101-110.
30. Ledoux, E., Girard, G., De Marsily, G., Villeneuve, J.P., Deschenes, J., 1989. Spatially distributed modeling: conceptual approach, coupling surface water and groundwater. In: Morel-Seytoux, HJ. (Ed.), Unsaturated Flow in Hydrologic Modeling, Theory and Practice. NATO ASI Ser. CNorwell, Massachussett, Kluwer Academic, pp. 435-454.
31. Ledoux E., Gomez E., Monget J.M., Viavattene C., Viennot P., Ducharne A., Benoit M., Mignolet C., Schott C., Mary B. Agriculture and groundwater nitrate contamination in the Seine Basin. The STICS-MODCOU modelling chain. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 375(33-47).
32. Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G., Miller, J.P., 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.
33. Liggett, J.A., 1975. Basic equations of unsteady flow, in Unsteady Flow in Open Channels. In: Mahmood, K., Yevjevick, V. (Eds.), vol. I, Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 29-62.
34. Lobligeois, F., 2008. Etude des stratégies de couplage entre un modèle hydrologique et un modèle hydraulique. Application à la modélisation-semi distribuée du bassin versant du Serein, ENSEEIHT, Toulouse.
35. Maingi J.K., Marsh S.E. Quantifying hydrologic impacts following dam construction along the Tana River, Kenya. J. Arid Environ. 2002, 50(1):53-79.
36. McCarthy, G.T., 1938. The unit hydrograph and flood routing. In: Conf. of the North Atlantic Division, US Army Corps of Engineers.
37. Mejia A.I., Reed S.M. Evaluating the effects of parameterized cross section shapes and simplified routing with a coupled distributed hydrologic and hydraulic model. J. Hydrol. 2011, 409(1-2):512.
38. Miller J.R., Russell G.L., Caliri G. Continental-Scale river flow in climate models. J. Climatol. 1994, 7:914-928.
39. Nash J.E. The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Bull. IAHS 1958, 3(45):114-121.
40. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, 1-A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
41. Oki T., Sud Y.C. Design of total runoff integrating pathways (TRIP) - a global river channel network. Earth Interact. 1998, 2(1):1-37.
42. Orlandini S., Rosso R. Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34(8):1971-1985.
43. Pavelsky T.M., Smith L.C. Rivwidth: a software tool for the automated detection of river widths from remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Geosci. Rem. Sens. Lett. 2008, 5(1):70-73.
44. Perumal M., Moramarco T., Barbetta S., Melone F., Sahoo B. Real-time flood-stage forecasting by variable parameter Muskingum stage hydrograph routing method. Hydrol. Res. 2011, 42(2-3):150-161.
45. Rivas Casado, M., 2006. The use of geostatistics for hydromorphological assessment in rivers. Ph.D thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield.
46. Rousset, F., Habets, F., Gomez, E., Le Moigne, P., Morel, S., Noilhan, J., Ledoux, E., 2004. Hydrometeorological modeling of the Seine basin using the SAFRAN-ISBA-MODCOU system. Geo. Ress., 109(D14), D14105.
47. Saleh, F., 2010. Contribution of 1D local hydraulic modeling to improve simulations of river stages and stream-aquifer interactions at regional scale, Ph.D thesis, UMR SISYPHE, UPMC (University of Paris VI), Paris.
48. Saleh F., Flipo N., Habets F., Ducharne A., Oudin L., Viennot P., Ledoux E. Modeling the impact of in-stream water level fluctuations on stream-aquifer interactions at the regional scale. J. Hydrol. 2011, 400(3-4):490-500.
49. Schulze K., Hunger M., Doll P. Simulating river flow velocity on global scale. J. Adv. Geosci. 2005, 5:133-136.
50. Strelkoff, T., 1970. Numerical solution of Saint-Venant equations. Journal of hydraulic Division. ASCE, 96.
51. Zhang X., Bao W., Qu S., Yu Z. One-dimensional hydrodynamic model accounting for tidal effect. Hydrol. Res. 2012, 43(1-2):113-122.