Real-time flood stage forecasting by Variable Parameter Muskingum Stage hydrograph routing method

Hydrology Research

Volumn 42, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 150-161

  Perumal, Muthiah ^a   Moramarco, Tommaso ^b   Barbetta, Silvia ^b   Melone, Florisa ^b   Sahoo, Bhabagrahi ^a,c  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c ICAR RESEARCH COMPLEX FOR NEH REGION   (India)

Author keywords

Compound channel; Flood; Hydrograph; Muskingum stage; Real time forecasting variable parameter

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL ITALY; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COMPOUND CHANNEL; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOOD WAVES; FORECAST ERRORS; FORECAST MODEL; FORECASTING MODELS; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROGRAPHS; LEADTIME; LINEAR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL; MUSKINGUM STAGE; REAL-TIME FORECASTING; RIVER BASINS; RIVER GAUGING; ROUTING METHODS; TIME INTERVAL; TRAVEL TIME; VARIABLE PARAMETERS; WARNING SYSTEMS;

FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; REAL VARIABLES; RIVERS;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ERROR ANALYSIS; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOOD WAVE; FLOODING; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROMETRY; NUMERICAL MODEL; REAL TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRAVEL TIME;

ITALY; TIBER RIVER;

EID: 79955751275     PISSN: 00291277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2011.063     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ahsan, M. & O'Connor, K. M. 1994 A reappraisal of the Kalman filtering technique, as applied in river flow forecasting. J. Hydrol. 161, 197-226. (Pubitemid 290126)
2. Apollov, B. A., Kalinin, G. P. & Komarov, V. D. 1964 Hydrological Forecasting (translated from Russian). Israel Programme for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
3. ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models of the Watershed Management Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Division 1993 Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng ASCE 119(3), 429-442.
4. Babovic, V., Canizares, R, Jensen, H. R & Klinting, A. 2001 Neural networks as routine for error updating of numerical models. J. Hydraul. Eng ASCE 127(3), 181-193. (Pubitemid 32337853)
5. Barbetta, S., Brocea, L., Melone, F. & Moramarco, T. 2008 On the lateral inflows assessment within a real-time stage monitoring addressed to flood forecasting. In: Proceedings of the iEMSs Fourth Biennial Meeting: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software (iEMSs 2008) (Sanchez-Marrè, M., Béjar, J., Comas, J., Rizzoli, A. E. & Guariso, G. (eds.)). International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Barcelona, pp. 438-445
6. Box, G. E. P. & Jenkins, G. M. 1970 Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden-Bay Inc, San Francisco.
7. Cunge, J. A. 1969 On the subject of a flood propagation method (Muskingum Method). J. HydrauL Res., IAHR 7(2), 205-230.
8. Dooge, J. C. I., Strupczewski, W. G. & Napiorkowski, J. J. 1982 Hydrodynamic derivation of storage parameters of the Muskingum model. J. Hydrol. 54(4), 371-387. (Pubitemid 12260329)
9. Gelb, A. (ed.) 1974 Applied Optimal Estimation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Huang, W.-C. 1999 Kalman filter effective to hydrologie routing? J. Marine Sei. Tech. 7(1), 65-71.
11. Moramarco, T., Barbetta, S., Melone, F. & Singh, V. P. 2006 A real time stage Muskingum forecasting model for a site without rating curve. Hydrol. Sci. J. IAHS 51(1), 66-82. (Pubitemid 43231067)
12. Nash, J. E. & Sutcliffe, J. V. 1970 River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part-1: A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3), 282-290.
13. Neal, J. C., Atkinson, P. M. & Hutton, C. W. 2007 Flood inundation model updating using an ensemble Kalman filter and spatially distributed measurements. J. Hydrol. 336(3-4), 401-415. (Pubitemid 46399730)
14. Perumal, M. 1994a Hydrodynamic derivation of a variable parameter Muskingum method: 1. Theory and solution procedure. Hydrol. Sci. J. IAHS 39(5), 431-442. (Pubitemid 289104)
15. Perumal, M. 1994b Hydrodynamic derivation of a variable parameter Muskingum method: 2. Verification. Hydrol. Sci. J. IAHS 39(5), 443-458. (Pubitemid 289115)
16. Perumal, M. & Ranga Raju, K. G. 199&2 Variable-parameter stagehydrograph routing method. I: Theory. J. Hydrol. Engg ASCE 3(2), 109-114.
17. Perumal, M. & Ranga Raju, K. G. 1998b Variable-parameter stagehydrograph routing method. II: Evaluation. J. HydroL Engg. ASCE 3(2), 115-121.
18. Perumal, M. & Ranga Raju, K. G. 1999 Approximate convection diffusion equations. J. Hydrol. Engg. ASCE 4(2), 161-164.
19. Perumal, M., Moramarco, T., Sahoo, B. & Barbetta, S. 2007 A methodology for discharge estimation and rating curve development at ungauged river sites. Water Resour. Res. 43(2), W02412, 1-22.
20. Perumal, M., Moramarco, T., Sahoo, B. & Barbetta, S. 2010 On the practical applicability of the VPMS routing method for rating curve development at ungauged river sites. Water Resour. Res. 46(3), W03522.
21. Refsgaard, J. C. 1997 Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting. Nordic Hydrology 28, 65-84.