An assignment of intrinsically disordered regions of proteins based on NMR structures

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 181, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 29-36

  Ota, Motonori ^a   Koike, Ryotaro ^a   Amemiya, Takayuki ^a   Tenno, Takeshi ^a   Romero, Pedro R ^b   Hiroaki, Hidekazu ^a   Dunker, A Keith ^b   Fukuchi, Satoshi ^c  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MAEBASHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Deviations; Intrinsically disordered proteins; Matthews's correlation coefficient; Missing residues; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84870947569     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: 10958657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Altschul S.F., et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:3389-3402.
2. Berman H., et al. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10:980.
3. Brunger A.T. X-ray crystallography and NMR reveal complementary views of structure and dynamics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4(Suppl.):862-865.
4. Cheng Y., et al. Abundance of intrinsic disorder in protein associated with cardiovascular disease. Biochemistry 2006, 45:10448-10460.
5. Chou P.Y., Fasman G.D. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1978, 47:45-148.
6. Doreleijers J.F., et al. NRG-CING: integrated validation reports of remediated experimental biomolecular NMR data and coordinates in wwPDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D519-D524.
7. Dunker A.K., et al. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 2002, 41:6573-6582.
8. Dunker A.K., et al. Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2001, 19:26-59.
9. Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:197-208.
10. Feng Y., et al. Solution structure and mapping of a very weak calcium-binding site of human translationally controlled tumor protein by NMR. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 467:48-57.
11. Fukuchi S., et al. Binary classification of protein molecules into intrinsically disordered and ordered segments. BMC Struct. Biol. 2011, 11:29.
12. Fukuchi S., et al. IDEAL: intrinsically disordered proteins with extensive annotations and literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D507-D511.
13. Fuxreiter M., et al. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 338:1015-1026.
14. Galea C.A., et al. Regulation of cell division by intrinsically unstructured proteins: intrinsic flexibility, modularity, and signaling conduits. Biochemistry 2008, 47:7598-7609.
15. Garbuzynskiy S.O., et al. Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures: is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X-ray-and NMR-resolved protein structures?. Proteins 2005, 60:139-147.
16. Goroncy A.K., et al. NMR solution structures of actin depolymerizing factor homology domains. Protein Sci. 2009, 18:2384-2392.
17. Gould C.M., et al. ELM: the status of the 2010 eukaryotic linear motif resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:D167-D180.
18. He B., et al. Predicting intrinsic disorder in proteins: an overview. Cell Res. 2009, 19:929-949.
19. Hellman M., et al. Solution structure of coactosin reveals structural homology to ADF/cofilin family proteins. FEBS Lett. 2004, 576:91-96.
20. Henrick K., Thornton J.M. PQS: a protein quaternary structure file server. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23:358-361.
21. Hornbeck P.V., et al. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D261-D270.
22. Iakoucheva L.M., et al. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 323:573-584.
23. Jones D.T., Ward J.J. Prediction of disordered regions in proteins from position specific score matrices. Proteins 2003, 53(Suppl. 6):573-578.
24. Larsson G., et al. Detection of nano-second internal motion and determination of overall tumbling times independent of the time scale of internal motion in proteins from NMR relaxation data. J. Biomol. NMR 2003, 27:291-312.
25. Lartigue A., et al. X-ray structure and ligand binding study of a moth chemosensory protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:32094-32098.
26. Le Gall T., et al. Intrinsic disorder in the Protein Data Bank. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2007, 24:325-342.
27. Lee M.R., et al. Inhibition of APP intracellular domain (AICD) transcriptional activity via covalent conjugation with Nedd8. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 366:976-981.
28. Lobanov M.Y., et al. Library of disordered patterns in 3D protein structures. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000958.
29. Markley J.L., et al. Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. IUPAC-IUBMB-IUPAB inter-union task group on the standardization of data bases of protein and nucleic acid structures determined by NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR 1998, 12:1-23.
30. Marx U.C., et al. Solution structures of human parathyroid hormone fragments hPTH(1-34) and hPTH(1-39) and bovine parathyroid hormone fragment bPTH(1-37). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 267:213-220.
31. Matthews B.W. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975, 405:442-451.
32. Minezaki Y., et al. Human transcription factors contain a high fraction of intrinsically disordered regions essential for transcriptional regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 359:1137-1149.
33. Mittag T., Forman-Kay J.D. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 17:3-14.
34. Mohan A., et al. Influence of sequence changes and environment on intrinsically disordered proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000497.
35. Mohan A., et al. Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 362:1043-1059.
36. Mosbah A., et al. Solution structure of a chemosensory protein from the moth Mamestra brassicae. Biochem. J. 2003, 369:39-44.
37. Muchmore S.W., et al. X-ray and NMR structure of human Bcl-xL, an inhibitor of programmed cell death. Nature 1996, 381:335-341.
38. Pawley N.H., et al. An improved method for distinguishing between anisotropic tumbling and chemical exchange in analysis of 15N relaxation parameters. J. Biomol. NMR 2001, 20:149-165.
39. Rabut G., Peter M. Function and regulation of protein neddylation. 'Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects' review series. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:969-976.
40. Serrano P., et al. Comparison of NMR and crystal structures highlights conformational isomerism in protein active sites. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. F: Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2010, 66:1393-1405.
41. Sickmeier M., et al. DisProt: the database of disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:D786-D793.
42. Sikic K., et al. Systematic comparison of crystal and NMR protein structures deposited in the protein data bank. Open Biochem. J. 2010, 4:83-95.
43. Sprangers R., et al. Refinement of the protein backbone angle PSI in NMR structure calculations. J. Biomol. NMR 2000, 16:47-58.
44. Sugase K., et al. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 2007, 447:1021-1025.
45. Sugase K., et al. Tailoring relaxation dispersion experiments for fast-associating protein complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129:13406-13407.
46. Tamiola K., et al. Sequence-specific random coil chemical shifts of intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 132:18000-18003.
47. Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D214-D219. The UniProt Consortium.
48. Tomaselli S., et al. The alpha-to-beta conformational transition of Alzheimer's Abeta-(1-42) peptide in aqueous media is reversible: a step by step conformational analysis suggests the location of beta conformation seeding. ChemBioChem 2006, 7:257-267.
49. Tompa P. The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:3346-3354.
50. Tzakos A.G., et al. NMR techniques for very large proteins and rnas in solution. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2006, 35:319-342.
51. Ulrich E.L., et al. BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:D402-D408.
52. Uversky V.N., Dunker A.K. Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804:1231-1264.
53. Uversky V.N., et al. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions?. Proteins 2000, 41:415-427.
54. Ward J.J., et al. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337:635-645.
55. Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293:321-331.
56. Zhang M., et al. Calcium-induced conformational transition revealed by the solution structure of apo calmodulin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2:758-767.
57. Zhang Y., et al. Between order and disorder in protein structures: analysis of "dual personality" fragments in proteins. Structure 2007, 15:1141-1147.