Using a high-fidelity patient simulator with first-year medical students to facilitate learning of cardiovascular function curves

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 213-219

  Harris, David M ^a   Ryan, Kathleen ^a   Rabuck, Cynthia ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Curricula; Manikins; Medical education; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870864232     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00058.2012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Carlin RD. Survey results and a recommendation for a change in U.S. medical physiology curricula. Acad Med 64: 202-207, 1989.
2. Association of American Medical Colleges Institute for Improving Medical Education. Effective Use of Educational Technology in Medical Education. Colloquium on Educational Technology: Recommendations and Guidelines for Medical Educators (online). https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Effective%20Use%20of%20Educational.pdf [20 June 2012].
3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical Simulation in Medical Education: Results of an AAMC Survey (online). https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Medical%20Simulation%20in%20Medical%20Education%20Results%20of%20an%20AAMC%20Survey.pdf [20 June 2012].
4. Euliano TY. Small group teaching: clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. Adv Physiol Educ 25: 36-43, 2001.
5. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada. From the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin Number Four, 1910. Bull World Health Organ 80: 594-602, 2002.
6. Garrett BM, MacPhee M, Jackson C. Implementing high-fidelity simulation in Canada: reflections on 3 years of practice. Nurse Educ Today 31: 671-676.
7. Gates MG, Parr MB, Hughen JE. Enhancing nursing knowledge using high-fidelity simulation. J Nurs Educ. 51: 9-15.
8. Gordon JA, Oriol NE, Cooper JB. Bringing good teaching cases "to life": a simulator-based medical education service. Acad Med 79: 23-27, 2004.
9. Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 29: 38-42, 2007.
10. Halm BM, Lee MT, Franke AA. Improving medical student toxicology knowledge and self-confidence using mannequin simulation. Hawaii Med J 69: 4-7.
11. Hodge M, Martin CT, Tavernier D, Perea-Ryan M, Alcala-Van Houten L. Integrating simulation across the curriculum. Nurse Educ 33: 210-214, 2008.
12. Hurst JW. The overlecturing and underteaching of clinical medicine. Arch Intern Med 164: 1605-1608, 2004.
13. Leigh GT. High-fidelity patient simulation and nursing students' selfefficacy: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 5: article 37, 2008.
14. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 44: 50-63.
15. Partin JL, Payne TA, Slemmons MF. Students' perceptions of their learning experiences using high-fidelity simulation to teach concepts relative to obstetrics. Nurs Educ Perspect 32: 186-188.
16. Richardson D, Birge B. Teaching physiology by combined passive (pedagogical) and active (andragogical) methods. Adv Physiol Educ 13: 66-74, 1995.
17. Russell JA, Barrett LF. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. J Pers Soc Psychol 76: 805-819, 1999.
18. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA. Using simulation-based training to improve patient safety: what does it take? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31: 363-371, 2005.
19. Wilford A, Doyle TJ. Integrating simulation training into the nursing curriculum. Br J Nurs 15: 926-930, 2006.