Relationships between kinetic constants and the amino acid composition of enzymes from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycolysis pathway

Eurasip Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology

Volumn 2012, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Zikmanis, Peteris ^a   Kampenusa, Inara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA   (Latvia)

Author keywords

Glycolytic enzymes; Michaelis Menten constant; Multivariate relationships; Sequence dependent properties; Specificity constant; Turnover number

Indexed keywords

GLYCOLYTIC ENZYME; MICHAELIS-MENTEN CONSTANT; MULTIVARIATE RELATIONSHIPS; SEQUENCE-DEPENDENT; SPECIFICITY CONSTANT; TURNOVER NUMBER;

AMINO ACIDS; ASCORBIC ACID; ENZYME KINETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; RATE CONSTANTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

YEAST;

ENOLASE; GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; GLYCOLYTIC ENZYME; HEXOKINASE; PHOSPHOGLYCERATE KINASE; PHOSPHOGLYCERATE MUTASE; PYRUVATE CARBOXYLASE; PYRUVATE DECARBOXYLASE; PYRUVATE KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TRIOSEPHOSPHATE ISOMERASE;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOCATALYST; CATALYSIS; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME KINETICS; GLYCOLYSIS; MICHAELIS CONSTANT; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TURNOVER TIME;

EID: 84870775587     PISSN: 16874145     EISSN: 16874153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1687-4153-2012-11     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. L Gerosa, U Sauer, Regulation and control of metabolic fluxes in microbes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 1-10 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04. 016
2. PK Agarwal, Enzymes: an integrated view of structure, dynamics and function. Microbial Cell. Fact 5, 2 (2006). doi:10.1186/1475-2859-5-2
3. DA Kraut, KS Carroll, D Herschlag, Challenges in enzyme mechanism and energetics. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 517-571 (2003). doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem. 72.121801.161617
4. SC Pegg, SD Brown, S Ojha, J Seffernick, EC Meng, JH Morris, PJ Chang, CC Huang, TE Ferrin, PC Babbitt, Leveraging enzyme structure-function relationships for functional inference and experimental design: the structure-function linkage database. Biochemistry 45, 2545-2555 (2006). doi:10.1021/bi052101l
5. E Nevoigt, Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 72, 379-412 (2008). doi:10.1128/MMBR.00025-07
6. C Magyar, E Tudos, I Simon, Functionally and structurally relevant residues of enzymes: are they segregated or overlapping? FEBS Lett 567, 239-242 (2004)
7. DD Boehr, R Nussinov, PE Wright, The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol 5, 789-796 (2009). doi:10.1038/nchembio.232
8. Z Zhang, S Kochhar, MG Grigorov, Descriptor-based protein remote homology identification. Protein Sci 14, 431-444 (2005). doi:10.1110/ps.041035505
9. S Rackovsky, Sequenced physical properties encode the global organization of protein structure space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14345-14348 (2009). doi:10.1073/pnas.0903433106
10. A Deiana, A Giansanti, Predictors of natively unfolded proteins: unanimous consensus score to detect a twilight zone between order and disorder in generic datasets. BMC Bioinforma 11, 198 (2010). doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-198
11. MM Gromiha, Intrinsic relationship of amino acid composition/occurrence with topological parameters and protein folding rate. Open Struct. Biol. J 3, 126 (2009)
12. S Roy, D Martinez, H Platero, T Lane, M Werner-Washburne, Exploiting amino acid composition for predicting protein-protein interactions. PLoS One 4(11), e7813 (2009)
13. MA Antal, C Böde, P Csermely, Perturbation waves in proteins and protein networks: Applications of percolation and game theories in signaling and drug design. Curr. Protein Peptide Sci 10, 161 (2009)
14. KA Johnson, Role of induced fit in enzyme specificity: a molecular forward/reverse switch. J Biol. Chem 283, 26297-26301 (2008). doi:10.1074/jbc.R800034200
15. BRENDA (D Schomburg, Braunschweig, 2002). http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/. Accessed 27 December 2011
16. UniProtKB (The UniProt Consortium, 2008). http://www.uniprot.org. Accessed 27 December 2011
17. C Bauer, G Cercignani, GM Mura, M Paolini, A unified theory of enzyme kinetics based upon the systematic analysis of the variations of kcat, KM, and kcat/KM and the relevant ΔG0≠ values - possible implications in chemotherapy and biotechnology. Biochem. Pharmacol 61, 1049-1055 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0006-2952(01)00579-2
18. SA Benner, Enzyme kinetics and molecular evolution. Chem. Rev 89, 789-806 (1989). doi:10.1021/cr00094a004
19. E Gasteiger, A Gattiker, C Hoogland, I Ivanyi, RD Appel, A Bairoch, ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 3784-3788 (2003). doi:10.1093/nar/gkg563
20. MM Gromiha, AM Thangakani, S Selvaraj, Fold-rate: prediction of protein folding rates from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 34, W70-W74 (2006)
21. S Arlot, A Cellise, A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat. Surv 4, 40- 79 (2010). doi:10.1214/09-SS054
22. RM O'Brien, A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant 41, 673-690 (2007). doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
23. R Bhaskaran, PK Ponnuswamy, Positional flexibilities of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Int. J Pept. Protein Res 32, 242-255 (1988). doi:10.1111/j.1399-3011.1988.tb01258.x
24. G Deleage, B Roux, Algorithm for protein secondary structure prediction based on class prediction. Protein Eng 1, 289-294 (1987). doi:10.1093/protein/1. 4.289
25. JM Zimmerman, N Eliezer, R Simha, The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods. J Theor. Biol 21, 170-201 (1968)
26. S Lifson, C Sander, Nature 282, 109 (1979)
27. B Teusink, J Passage, CA Reijenga, E Esgalhado, CC van der Wejden, M Schepper, MC Walsh, BM Bakker, HV Westerhoff, JL Snoep, Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing Biochemistristy. Eur. J. Biochem 267, 1 (2000). doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000. 01527.x
28. K van Eunen, J Bouwman, P Daran-Lapujade, J Postmus, AB Canelas, FIC Mensonides, R Orij, I Tuzun, J van den Brink, GJ Smits, WM van Gulik, S Brul, JJ Heijnen, JH de Winde, MJT de Mattos, C Kettner, J Nielsen, HV Westerhoff, BM Bakker, Measuring enzyme activities under standardized in vivo-like conditions for systems biology. FEBS J 277, 749 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07524. x
29. C Böde, IA Kovács, MS Szalay, R Palotai, T Korcsmáros, P Csermely, Network analysis of protein dynamics. FEBS Lett 281, 2776-2782 (2007)
30. K.C. Li, Nonlinear confounding in high dimensional regression. Ann. Stat 25, 577-612 (1997). doi:10.1214/aos/1031833665
31. SM Yan, DQ Shi, H Nong, G Wu, Predicting KM values of beta-glucosidases using cellobiose as substrate. Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci 4, 1 -8 (2012)
32. SM Yan, G Wu, Prediction of Michaelis-Menten constant of betaglucosidases using nitrophenyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside as substrate. Protein Peptide Lett 18, 1053 (2011)
33. RR Gabdoulline, M Stein, RC Wade, qPIPSA: relating enzymatic kinetic parameters and interaction fields. BMC Bioinforma 8, 373 (2007). doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-373