The institutional embedding of interactive policy making: Insights from a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 125-148

  Edelenbos, Jurian ^a,b   Klok, Pieter Jan ^b   Van Tatenhove, Jan ^a,c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Embedding; Governance; Impact; Institutions; Interactive policy making

Indexed keywords

EID: 58849127020     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074008317157     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks. Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53 (4). 1044-1074.
3. Braybrooke, D. (1974). Traffic congestion goes through the issue-machine. London / Boston: Routledge / Kegan Paul.
4. Burns, T.R., Baumgarten, Th., & Deville, Ph. (1985). Man, decisions, society: The theory of actor-system dynamics for social scientists. New York: Gordon & Breach.
5. DeLeon, P. (1992). The democratization of the policy sciences. Public Administration Review, 52, 125-129.
6. DeLeon, P. (1994). Democracy and the policy sciences: Aspirations and operations. Policy Studies Journal, 22, 200-212.
7. Dryzek, J.S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dryzek, J.S. (2007). Networks and democratic ideals: Equality, freedom, and communication. In E. Sarenson & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 262-273). London: Palgrave.
9. Dunn, W. (1994) Public policy analysis. An introduction. (2 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
10. Edelenbos, J. (2004) Quick scan interactive policy making at departmental level in the Netherlands (in Dutch). Amsterdam: Institute for Public and Politics.
11. Edelenbos, J. (2005) Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance, 18 (1). 111-134.
12. Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.H. (2006). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (3). 417-446.
13. Edelenbos, J., Klok, P.J., van Tatenhove, J., & Domingo, A. (2006). Citizens as policy advisors. A comparative research to eight interactive projects at three departments (in Dutch). Amsterdam: Institute for Public and Politics.
14. Edelenbos, J., & Monnikhof, R. (Eds.). (2001). Local interactive policy development (in Dutch). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Lemma.
15. Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, experts and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16. Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W.D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Goodin, R.E. (1996). The theory of institutional design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hall, P.A., & Taylor, R.C.R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
19. Healy, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
20. Hogwood, B.W. (1983). Policy dynamics. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf.
21. Huberman, M. (1994). Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 7 (4). 13-33.
22. King, L.A. (2003). Deliberation, legitimacy, and multilateral democracy. Governance, 16, 23-50.
23. Kiser, L., & Ostrom, E. (1982). The three worlds of action: A meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: E. Ostrom (Ed.), Strategies of political inquiry (pp. 82-97). London: Sage.
24. Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. (2000). Politicians and interactive decision-making: Institutional spoilsport or play-makers ? Public Administration, 78 (2). 365-387.
25. Klijn, E.H., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not ? Public Administration, 85 (3). 587-609.
26. Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, 1 (4). 537-578.
27. Koppenjan, J.F.M., & Klijn, E.H.Y. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
28. Lowndes, V., Pratchet, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 1, local government perspectives, Public Administration, 76 (2). 205-222.
29. Mayer, I., Edelenbos, J., & Monnikhof, R. (2005). Interactive policy development: Undermining or sustaining democracy. Public Administration, 83 (1). 179-199.
30. McLaverty, P. (Ed.). (2002). Public participation and innovations in community governance. Ashgate, UK Aldershot.
31. Peters, G.B. (2005). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Continuum.
32. Peters, G.B., & Hogwood, Brian W. (1980). Policy succession: The dynamics of policy change. Glasgow, UK: Centre for the Study of Public Policy.
33. Prapper, I., & Steenbeek, D. (1999). The approach of interactive policy making: Every situation is different (in Dutch). Bussum, the Netherlands: Coutinho.
34. Scharpf, F.W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy Research. Boulder, CO / Oxford, UK: Westview.
35. Shulha, L.M., & Cousins, J.B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18 (3). 195-208.
36. Sarenson, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1). 98-114.
37. Sarenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network politics, political capital and democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 26 (6). 609-634.
38. Wagschal, U. (1997). Direct democracy and public policymaking. Journal of Public Policy, 17, 223-245.
39. Weiss, C. H. (Ed.). (1977). Using social research in public policy making. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Lexington Books.
40. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Young, I.M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29 (5). 670-90.