Marine protected areas-substantiating their worth

Marine Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 421-430

  Glenn, H ^a   Wattage, P ^a   Mardle, S ^a   Rensburg, T Van ^b   Grehan, A ^b   Foley, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Marine protected area

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL REEF; CORAL REEF; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENT; MARINE PARK; MARINE POLICY; PROTECTED AREA;

IRELAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANTHOZOA;

EID: 76549105979     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Draft Marine Bill, cm 7351. London: HM Government; April 2008.
2. Balmford A., Gravestock P., Hockley N., McClean C.J., and Roberts C.M. The world wide costs of marine protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 101 26 (2004) 9694-9697
3. Gravestock P., Roberts C.M., and Bailey A. The income requirements of marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 51 3 (2008) 272-283
4. Moran D, Hussain S, Fofana A, Frid C, Paramour O, Robinson L, et al. Marine Bill-marine nature conservation proposals, valuing the benefits. CRO380-Natural Environment Group Science Division, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; 2007.
5. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (2005), Island Press, Washington, DC
6. Beaumont N.J., Austen M.C., Atkins J.P., Burdon D., Degraer S., Dentinho T.P., et al. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54 (2007) 253-265
7. Brown T.C., Bergstrom J.C., and Loomis J.B. Defining, valuing and providing ecosystem goods and services. Natural Resources Journal 47 2 (2007) 329-376
8. Farrow S. Marine protected areas: emerging economics. Marine Policy 20 6 (1996) 439-446
9. Subade RF. Mechanisms to capture economic values of marine biodiversity: the case of Tubbataha Reefs UNESCO world heritage site, Philippines. Marine Policy; 2007.
10. Beaumont N.J., Austen M.C., Mangi S.C., and Townsend M. Economic valuation for the conservation of marine biodiversity. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56 3 (2008) 386-396
11. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74 (1966) 132-157
12. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., and Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1998) 64-75
13. Louviere J.J., and Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research XX (1983) 350-367
14. Carson R.T., Nicholas E.F., and Meade N.F. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2001) 173-210
15. Barkmann J., Glenk K., Keil A., Leemhuis C., Dietrich N., Gerold G., et al. Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: the case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 48-62
16. Adamowicz W, Boxall P. Future directions of stated choice methods for environment valuation. Paper prepared for Choice experiments: a new approach to environment valuation, London, England; April 10, 2001.
17. Carson R.T., Louviere J.J., Anderson D.A., Arabie P., Bunch D., Henisher D.A., et al. Experimental analysis of choice. Marketing Letters 5 4 (1994) 351-368
18. Green P.E., and Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5 (1978) 103-123
19. Green P.E., and Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing 3-19 (1990)
20. Viscusi W.K., Megat W.A., and Huber J. Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments for risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21 (1991) 32-51
21. Opaluch J.J., Swallow S., Weaver T., Wessels C., and Wichlens D. Evaluating impacts from noxious waste facilities, including public preferences in current siting mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24 (1993) 41-59
22. Adamowicz W., Louviere J., and Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (1994) 271-292
23. In: Bennett J., and Blamey R. (Eds). The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation, new horizons in environmental economics (2001), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
24. Farber S.C., Costanza R., and Wilson M.A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 41 (2002) 375-392
25. Powe N.A., Garrod G.D., and McMahon P.L. Mixing methods within stated preference environmental valuation: choice experiments and post-questionnaire quantitative analysis. Ecological Economics 52 (2005) 513-526
26. Hall J., Fiebig D.G., King M.T., Hossain I., and Louviere J.J. What influences participation in genetic carrier testing? Results from a discrete choice experiment. Journal of Health Economics 25 (2006) 520-537
27. Kjaer T., and Gyrd-Hansen D. Preference heterogeneity and choice of cardiac rehabilitation program: results from a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy 85 (2008) 124-132
28. Hjelmgren J., and Anell A. Population preferences and choice of primary care models: a discrete choice experiment in sweden. Health Policy 83 (2007) 314-322
29. Hensher D.A., Stopher P.R., and Louviere J.J. An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application. Journal of Air Transport Management 7 (2001) 373-379
30. Banfi S., Farsi M., Filippini M., and Jakob M. Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings. Energy Economics 30 (2008) 503-516
31. Wessells CR, Johnston RJ, Donath H. Assessing consumer preferences for eco-labelled seafood: the influence of species, certifier, and household attributes. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association, Nashville, USA; August 1999.
32. Beckett A, Rollins K, Kanetkar V, Van Duren E. Using a random utility model to measure willingness to pay for "green" attributes of green goods: implications for market provision of environmental quality. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association, Nashville, USA; 1999.
33. Teisl MF, Roe B, Levy AS. Eco-certification: why it may not be a 'field of dreams'. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association, Nashville, USA; August 8-11, 1999.
34. Pickering HJ, editor. Market-driven incentive structures for sustainable fisheries management. EU FAIR Project Final Report CT984255, Portsmouth: CEMARE, University of Portsmouth; 2001.
35. Brau R, Cao D. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists' preferences: a choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. FEEM Working paper No.33. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei; 2006.
36. Rae D. The value to visitors of improving visibility at Mesa Verde and Great Smoky National Parks. In: Rowe R.D., and Chestnut L.G. (Eds). Managing air quality and scenic resources at national parks and wilderness areas (1983), Westview Press, Boulder, CO 217-234
37. Rae D.A. Benefits of visual air quality in Cincinnati (1984), Charles River Associates, Boston, MA
38. Lareau T.J., and Rae D.A. Valuing WTP for diesel odor reductions: an application of contingent ranking technique. Southern Economics Journal 55 3 (1989) 728-742
39. Mackenzie J. Conjoint analysis of deer hunting. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19 2 (1990) 109-117
40. Mackenzie J. Evaluating recreation trip attributes and travel time via conjoint analysis. Journal of Leisure Research 24 2 (1992) 171-184
41. Mackenzie J.A. A comparison of contingent preference models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (1993) 593-603
42. Gan C., and Luzar E.J. A conjoint analysis of waterfowl hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25 2 (1993) 36-45
43. Boxall P., Adamowicz W., Swait J., Williams M., and Louviere J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18 (1996) 243-253
44. Smith V.K., and Desvousges W.H. Measuring water quality benefits (1986), Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston MA
45. Roe B., Boyle K.J., and Teisl M.F. Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (1996) 145-159
46. Adamowicz W.L., Swait J., Boxall P., Louviere J., and Williams M. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (1997) 65-84
47. Christie M., Hanley N., and Hynes S. Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods. Journal of Forest Economics 13 2-3 (2007) 75-102
48. Beharry N, Scarpa R. Joint vs separate decisions with taste variation: exploring responses of couples in choice experiments for coastal water quality valuation in Tobago. Paper presented at the third World congress of environmental and resource economists, Kyoto, Japan, 3-7 July 2006.
49. Eggert H., and Olsson B. Valuing multi-attribute marine water quality. Marine Policy 33 2 (2009) 201-206
50. Sorice MG, Oh C-O, Ditton RB. Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment to analyze scuba diver preferences for coral reef conservation. Final Project Report for the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, College Station, TX: Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University; 2005.
51. Wattage P., Mardle S., and Pascoe S. Evaluation of the importance of fisheries management objectives using choice experiments. Ecological Economics 55 (2005) 85-95
52. DeShazo J.R., and Fermo G. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 1 (2002) 123-143
53. Louviere J.J. Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preference. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXII 1 (1988) 93-118
54. Louviere J.J., and Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research XX (1983) 350-367
55. Ryan M. Using consumer preferences in health care decision making: the application of conjoint analysis (1996), Office of Health Economics, London
56. Dixon J., and Sherman P. Economics of protected areas (1990), Island Press, Washington DC
57. Pendleton L.H. Valuing coral reef protection. Ocean and Coastal Management 26 2 (1995) 119-131
58. Dixon J. Economic benefits of marine protected areas. Oceanus 36 3 (1993) 35-41
59. Dixon J., Scura L.F., and vant Hof T. Meeting ecological and economic goals: marine parks in the Caribbean. Ambio 22 2-3 (1993) 2-3
60. Edwards P. Sustainable financing for ocean and coastal management in Jamaica: the potential for revenues from tourist user fees. Marine Policy 33 2 (2009) 376-385
61. Department of Environment (DoE). Heritage and Local Government. Annual report 2006. Environment & Natural Heritage 〈http://www.environ.ie/〉 [Accessed 29 May 2007].
62. Aas O., Haider W., and Hunt L. Angler responses to potential harvest regulations in a Norwegian sport fishery: a conjoint-based choice modelling approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20 (2000) 940-950
63. van Til J.A., Stiggelbout A.M., and Ijzerman M.J. The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis. Patient Education and Counseling 74 2 (2009) 264-271
64. Mitchell R.C., and Carson R.T. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method (1989), Resources For The Future, Washington DC
65. Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Working papers in economics No. 52. Gothenbourg, Sweden: Department of Economics, Gothenbourg University; 2001.
66. Brander L.M., Beukering P.V., and Cesar H.S.J. The recreational value of coral reefs: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 63 1 (2007) 209-218
67. Brookshire D.S., and Neil H.R. Benefit transfers: conceptual and empirical issues. Water Resources Research 28 (1992) 651-655
68. Morrison M., and Bennett J. Valuing New South Wales rivers for use in benefit transfer. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48 4 (2004) 591-611
69. Bennett J. A threshold value analysis of proposed forestry reserves. Australian Forestry 61 (1999) 1-8
70. Desvousges W.H., Naughton M.C., and Parsons G.R. Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resources Research 28 (1992) 675-683
71. Loomis J.B. The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. Water Resources Research 28 (1992) 701-705
72. Morrison M.D., Bennett J.W., Blamey R.K., and Louviere J.J. Choice modelling and tests of benefit transfer. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (2002) 161-170
73. Pomeroy R.S., Park J.E., and Watson L.W. How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area effectiveness (2004), IUCN, Cambridge
74. Fiske S.J. Sociocultural aspects of establishing marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 18 (1992) 25-46
75. Kelleher C., and Recchia C. Lessons from marine protected areas around the world. Parks 8 2 (1998) 1-4
76. Pinnegar JK, Bell E. How do we judge whether an MPA has been 'successful' or not? Paper produced as an output of the EU 6th Framework funded specific targeted research Project Nu. SSP8-CT-2004-513670-Marine Protected Areas as a Tool for Ecosystem Conservation and Fisheries Management (PROTECT). Lowestoft: CEFAS, Lowestoft Laboratory; 2005.
77. National Research Council (US). Marine protected areas: tools for sustaining ocean ecosystems. Committee on the Evaluation, Design and Monitoring of Marine Reserves and Protected Areas in the United States. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.