Enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose and pretreated wheat straw: A detailed comparison using convenient kinetic analysis

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 128, Issue , 2013, Pages 679-687

  Monschein, Mareike ^a   Reisinger, Christoph ^b   Nidetzky, Bernd ^a,c  

^a AUSTRIAN CENTRE OF INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b SÜD CHEMIE AG   (Germany)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Hydrolysis rate; Lignocellulose; Microcrystalline cellulose

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; KINETICS; SUBSTRATES; SUGARS;

CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; DESCRIPTORS; HYDROLYSIS RATE; KINETIC ANALYSIS; KINETIC REGIME; LIGNOCELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; LOW DEGREE; LOW TEMPERATURES; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; REDUCING SUGARS; SOLUBLE SUGARS; SPACE TIME YIELD; SUBSTRATE CONVERSION; SUBSTRATE PROPERTIES; TRICHODERMA REESEI; WHEAT STRAWS;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

CELLULASE; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE;

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNGUS; HYDROLYSIS; KINEMATICS; LOW TEMPERATURE; SUBSTRATE; WHEAT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; HYDROLYSIS; HYPOCREA JECORINA; KINETICS; LOW TEMPERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84870669392     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.129     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agbor V.B., Cicek N., Sparling R., Berlin A., Levin D.B. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29:675-685.
2. Alvira P., Tomás-Pejó E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4851-4861.
3. Bansal P., Hall M., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27:833-848.
4. Bansal P., Vowell B.J., Hall M.J., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S. Elucidation of cellulose accessibility, hydrolysability and reactivity as the major limitations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 107:243-250.
5. Berlin A., Balakshin M., Gilkes N., Kadla J., Maximenko V., Kubo S., Saddler J. Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 125:198-209.
6. Billard, H., Faraj, A., Lopes Ferreira, N., Menir, S., Heiss-Blanquet, S., in press. Optimization of a synthetic mixture composed of major Trichoderma reesei enzymes for the hydrolysis of steam-exploded wheat straw. Biotechnol. Biofuels, doi:10.1186/1754-6834-5-9.
7. Bommarius A.S., Katona A., Cheben S.E., Patel A.S., Ragauskas A.J., Knudson K., Pu Y. Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. Metab. Eng. 2008, 10:370-381.
8. Bubner P., Dohr J., Plank H., Mayrhofer C., Nidetzky B. Cellulases dig deep: in situ observation of the mesoscopic structural dynamics of enzymatic cellulose degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:2759-2765.
9. Chang V.S., Holtzapple M.T. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86:5-37.
10. Gharpuray M.M., Lee Y.-H., Fan L.T. Structural modification of lignocellulosics by pretreatments to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25:157-172.
11. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59:257-268.
12. I. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 109:665-675.
13. Hall M., Bansal P., Lee J.H., Realff M.J., Bommarius A.S. Cellulose crystallinity-a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J. 2010, 277:1571-1582.
14. Hendriks A.T.W.M., Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:10-18.
15. Himmel M.E., Ding S.Y., Johnson D.K., Adney W.S., Nimlos M.R., Brady J.W., Foust T.D. Biomass recalcitrance. Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315:804-807.
16. Igarashi K., Uchihashi T., Koivula A., Wada M., Kimura S., Okamoto T., Penttilä M., Ando T., Samejima M. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 2011, 333:1279-1282.
17. Jorgensen H., Kristensen J.B., Felby C. Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels. Bioprod. Bioref. 2007, 1:119-134.
18. Kadam K.L., Rydholm E.C., McMillan J.D. Development and validation of a kinetic model for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20:698-705.
19. Kumar R., Wyman C.E. Access of cellulase to cellulose and lignin for poplar solids produced by leading pretreatment technologies. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25:807-819.
20. Kumar L., Arantes V., Chandra R., Saddler J. The lignin present in steam pretreated softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103:201-208.
21. Levine S.E., Fox J.M., Blanch H.W., Clark D.S. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107:37-51.
22. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., van Zyl W.H., Pretorius I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66:506-577.
23. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31:426-428.
24. Nidetzky B., Steiner W. A new approach for modeling cellulase-cellulose adsorption and the kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 42:469-479.
25. Nidetzky B., Steiner W., Hayn M., Esterbauer H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw after steam pretreatment: experimental data and kinetic modelling. Bioresour. Technol. 1993, 44:25-32.
26. Nidetzky B., Zachariae W., Gercken G., Hayn M., Steiner W. Hydrolysis of cellooligosaccharides by Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases - experimental-data and kinetic modeling. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, 16:43-52.
27. Steiner W., Sattler W., Esterbauer H. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei cellulase on cellulose: Experimental data and their analysis by different equations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1988, 32:853-865.
28. Varnai A., Siika-Aho M., Viikari L. Restriction of the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce by lignin and hemicellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 46:185-193.
29. Wyman C.E. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25:153-157.
30. Xu F., Ding H. A new kinetic model for heterogeneous (or spatially confined) enzymatic catalysis: contributions from the fractal and jamming (overcrowding) effects. Appl. Catal. A 2007, 317:70-81.
31. 4 pretreatments in Miscanthus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5:58.
32. Yang B., Willies D.M., Wyman C.E. Changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of Avicel cellulose with conversion. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94:1122-1128.
33. Yu A.H.C., Lee D., Saddler J.N. Adsorption and desorption of cellulase components during the hydrolysis of steam-exploded birch substrate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1995, 21:203-216.
34. Yu Z., Jameel H., Chang H.-M., Philips R., Park S. Evaluation of the factors affecting Avicel reactivity using multi-stage enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109:1131-1139.
35. Zhang Y.H., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88:797-824.