Changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of avicel cellulose with conversion

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1122-1128

  Yang, Bin ^a   Willies, Deidre M ^a   Wyman, Charles E ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulase; Cellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Substrate reactivity; Testarted hydrolysis

Indexed keywords

ENZYMES; HYDROLYSIS; SUBSTRATES;

CELLULASE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; SUBSTRATE REACTIVITY; TESTARTED HYDROLYSIS;

CELLULOSE;

CELLULASE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; PROTEINASE; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; ENZYME DEGRADATION; ENZYME INACTIVATION; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME REACTIVATION; HYDROLYSIS;

BETA-GLUCOSIDASE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME STABILITY; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TRICHODERMA;

CELLULOSE; HYDROLYSIS; SUBSTRATES;

EID: 33747114376     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20942     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beldman G, Voragen AGJ, Rombouts FM, Searlevanleeuwen MF, Pilnik W. 1987. Adsorption and kinetic-behavior of purified endoglucanases and exoglucanases from Trichoderma-viride. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:251-257.
2. Breyer WA, Matthews BW. 2001. A structural basis for processivity. Protein Sci 10:1699-1711.
3. Caminal G, Lopez-Santin J, Sola C. 1985. Kinetic modeling of the enzymic hydrolysis of pretreated cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:1282-1290.
4. Converse AO, Matsuno R, Tanaka M, Taniguchi M. 1988. A model of enzyme adsorption and hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with slow deactivation of the adsorbed enzyme. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:38-45.
5. Desai SG, Converse AO. 1997. Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:650-655.
6. Eriksson T, Borjesson J, Tjerneld F. 2002a. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 31(3):353-364.
7. Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F. 2002b. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 101:41-60.
8. Gan Q, Allen SJ, Taylor G. 2003. Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: An overview, an experimental study and mathematical modelling. Process Biochem 38:1003-1018.
9. Ghose TK. 1987. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257-268.
10. Gonzalez G, Caminal G, De Mas C, Lopez-Santin J. 1989. A kinetic model for pretreated wheat straw saccharification by cellulase. J Cheml Technol Biotechnol 44:275-288.
11. Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP. 1992. A theoretical analysis of cellulase product inhibition effect of cellulase binding constant, enzyme substrate ratio, and beta-glucosidase activity on the inhibition pattern. Biotechnol Bioeng 40(6):663-671.
12. Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Klesov AA. 1985. Kinetic model of the enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose in a column type reactor. Biotekhnologiya 3:112-122.
13. Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Klesov AA. 1987. Factors affecting the enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose in batch and continuous reactors: Computer simulation and experiment. Biotechnol Bioeng 29:906-910.
14. Hames B, Scarlata C, Sluiter A. 2004. Determination of protein content in biomass. In: National Bioenergy Center, Laboratory Analytical Procedure 2004. Gloden, CO: National Renewable Energy laboratory.
15. Holtzapple M, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C. 1990. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng 36:275-287.
16. Kadam KL, Rydholm EC, Knutsen JS, McMillan JD. 2002. Kinetic model for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Abstracts of Papers, 224th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA, United States, August 18-22, 2002:59.
17. Lynd LR, Cushman JH, Nichols RJ, Wyman CE. 1991. Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science 251:1318-1323.
18. Lynd LR, Elander RT, Wyman CE. 1996. Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57-58:741-761.
19. Mukataka S, Tada M, Takahashi J. 1983. Effects of agitation on enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose in a stirred-tank reactor. J Ferment Technol 61:615-621.
20. Nidetzky B, Steiner W. 1993. A new approach for modeling cellulase cellulose adsorption and the kinetics of the enzymatic-hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:469-479.
21. Nutor JRK, Converse AO. 1991. The effect of enzyme and substrate levels on the specific hydrolysis rate of pretreated poplar wood. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28-29:757-772.
22. Ooshima H, Burns DS, Converse AO. 1990. Adsorption of cellulase from Trichoderma reesei on cellulose and lignacious residue in wood pretreated by dilute sulfuric acid with explosive decompression. Biotechnol Bioeng 36:446-452.
23. Ooshima H, Kurakake M, Kato J, Harano Y. 1991. Enzymatic activity of cellulase adsorbed on cellulose and its change during hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 31:253-266.
24. Reese ET. 1982. Protection of Trichoderma reesei cellulase from inactivation due to shaking. Solution Behavior. Surfactants: Theor Appl Aspects [Proc Int Symp] 2:1487-1504.
25. Sinitsyn AP, Mitkevich OV, Klesov AA. 1986. Inactivation of cellulolytic enzymes by stirring and their stabilization by cellulose. Prikladnaya Biokhimiya i Mikrobiologiya 22:759-765.
26. Sutcliffe R, Saddler JN. 1986. The role of lignin in the adsorption of cellulases during enzymatic treatment of lignocellulosic material. Biotechnol Bioeng 17:749-762.
27. Todorovic R, Grujic S, Matavulj M. 1987. Effect of reaction end-products on the activity of cellulolytic enzymes and xylanase of Trichoderma harzianum. Microbios Lett 36:113-119.
28. Valjamae P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1998. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. Eur J of Biochem 253:469-475.
29. Wang SS, Converse AO. 1992. On the use of enzyme adsorption and specific hydrolysis rate to characterize thermal chemical pretreatment. Appl Biochem and Biotechnol 34-35:61-74.
30. Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J. 1999. Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: A tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol Progr 15:794-803.
31. Wyman CE. 1999. Biomass ethanol: Technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Ann Rev Energy Environ 24:189-226.
32. Zhang S, Wolfgang DE, Wilson DB. 1999. Substrate heterogeneity causes the nonlinear kinetics of insoluble cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 66:35-41.
33. Zou Jy, Kleywegt GJ, Stahlberg J, Driguez H, Nerinckx W, Claeyssens M, Koivula A, Teeri TT, Jones TA. 1999. Crystallographic evidence for substrate ring distortion and protein conformational changes during catalysis in cellobiohydrolase Ce16A from trichoderma reesei. Structure Fold Des 7:1035-1045.