Elucidation of cellulose accessibility, hydrolysability and reactivity as the major limitations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 107, Issue , 2012, Pages 243-250

  Bansal, Prabuddha ^a   Vowell, Bryan J ^a   Hall, Mélanie ^a,b   Realff, Matthew J ^a   Lee, Jay H ^a,c   Bommarius, Andreas S ^a,d  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^c Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^d GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis; Hydrolysability; Kinetic modeling; Reactivity

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; CRYSTALLINITIES; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; ENZYMATIC CELLULOSE; FRACTAL KINETICS; HYDROLYSABILITY; HYDROLYSIS RATE; HYDROLYTIC ACTIVITIES; KINETIC MODELING; RATE LIMITING FACTORS; RATE RETARDATION; SUBSTRATE DEPLETION;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; REACTIVITY (NUCLEAR);

CELLULOSE;

CELLULOSE;

BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDROLYSIS; POLYMERIZATION; REACTION KINETICS; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; CHEMOREACTIVITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPLETION; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROLYSIS KINETICS; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADSORPTION; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS;

EID: 84856578303     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.063     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bansal P., Hall M., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27:833-848.
2. Bansal P., Hall M., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S. Multivariate statistical analysis of x-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(12):4461-4471.
3. Bommarius A.S., Katona A., Cheben S.E., Patel A.S., Ragauskas A.J., Knudson K., Pu Y. Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. Metab. Eng. 2008, 10(6):370-381.
4. Brown R.E., Jarvis K.L., Hyland K.J. Protein measurement using bicinchonic acid: elimination of interfering substances. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 180:136-139.
5. Caminal G., López-Santín J., Solà C. Kinetic modeling of the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985, 27:1280-1282.
6. Chen Y., Stipanovic A.J., Winter W.T., Wilson D.B., Kim Y.-J. Effect of digestion by pure cellulases on crystallinity and average chain length for bacterial and microcrystalline celluloses. Cellulose 2007, 14:283-293.
7. Divne C., Stahlberg J., Reinikainen T., Ruohonen L., Pettersson G., Knowles J.K.C., Teeri T.T., Jones A. The three-dimensional structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 1994, 265:524-528.
8. Hall M., Bansal P., Lee J.H., Realff M.J., Bommarius A.S. Biological pretreatment of cellulose: enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis rate using cellulose-binding domains from cellulases. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(3):2910-2915.
9. Hall M., Bansal P., Lee J.H., Realff M.J., Bommarius A.S. Cellulose crystallinity - a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J. 2010, 277(6):1571-1582.
10. Hall M., Rubin J., Behrens S.H., Bommarius A.S. The cellulose-binding domain of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is also a thermostabilizing domain. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 155(4):370-376.
11. Heinzelman P., Snow C.D., Wu I., Nguyen C., Villalobos A., Govindarajan S., Minshull J., Arnold F.H. A family of thermostable fungal cellulases created by structure-guided recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(14):5610-5615.
12. Henrissat B. Cellulases and their interaction with cellulose. Cellulose 1994, 1(3):169-196.
13. Himmel M.E., Ding S.-Y., Johnson D.K., Adney W.S., Nimlos M.R., Brady J.W., Foust T.D. Biomass recalcitrance. Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315:804-807.
14. Hong J., Ye X., Zhang Y.-H.P. Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing cbm and gfp with its applications. Langmuir 2007, 23(25):12535-12540.
15. Igarashi K., Uchihashi T., Koivula A., Wada M., Kimura S., Okamoto T., Penttilä M., Ando T., Samejima M. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulases on cellulose surface. Science 2011, 333(6047):1279-1282.
16. Jalak J., Väljamäe P. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 106(6):871-883.
17. Jervis E.J., Haynes C.A., Kilburn D.G. Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272(38):24016-24023.
18. Kongruang S., Han M.J., Breton C.I.G., Penner M.H. Quantitative analysis of cellulose reducing ends. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2004, 113-116:213-231.
19. Kopelman R. Rate processes on fractals: theory, simulations and experiments. J. Stat. Phys. 1986, 42(1/2):185-200.
20. Kumar R., Wyman C.E. Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology?. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(18):4193-4202.
21. Kurasin M., Väljamäe P. Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286(1):166-177.
22. Levenspiel, O. 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
23. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., Zyl W.H.v., Pretorius I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66(3):506-577.
24. Park, S., Baker, J.O., Himmel, M.E., Parilla, P.A., Johnson, D.K., 2010. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 3(10).
25. Paul R., Teli M.D. Effect of swelling and reactive dyeing on the accessibility of cotton to cellulase enzymes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 121:1946-1950.
26. Praestgaard E., Elmerdahl J., Murphy L., Nymand S., McFarland K.C., Borch K., Westh P. A kinetic model for the burst phase of processive cellulases. FEBS J. 2011, 278(9):1547-1560.
27. Ragauskas, A.J., Williams, C.K., Davison, B.H., Britovsek, G., Cairney, J., Eckert, C.A., Jr., W.J.F., Hallett, J.P., Leak, D.J., Liotta, C.L., Mielenz, J.R., Murphy, R., Templer, R., Tschaplinski, T., 2006. The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials. Science, 311, 484-489.
28. Schubert C. Can biofuels finally take center stage?. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24:777-784.
29. Sin, G., Meyer, A.S., Gernaey, K.V., 2009. Are mechanistic cellulose-hydrolysis models reliable for use in biofuel process design? - Identifiability and sensitivity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Foundations of Computer-aided Process Design (FOCAPD).
30. Teeri T.T. Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol. 1997, 15:160-167.
31. The Mathworks Inc. R2008b. MATLAB.
32. Väljamäe P., Kipper K., Petterson G., Johansson G. Synergistic cellulose hydrolysis can be described in terms of fractal-like kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84(2):254-257.
33. Väljamäe P., Sild V., Pettersson G., Johansson G. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 253:469-475.
34. Xu F., Ding H. A new kinetic model for heterogeneous (or spatially confined) enzymatic catalysis: contributions from the fractal and jamming (overcrowding) effects. Appl. Catal. A 2007, 317:70-81.
35. Zhang Y.-H.P., Lynd L.R. Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:1510-1515.
36. Zhang Y.-H.P., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88(7):797-824.