Power control to the people? Private consumers' acceptance of smart meters

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Kranz, Johann ^a   Gallenkamp, Julia ^a   Picot, Arnold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Green IT; Smart grid; Smart meter; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

ENERGY SYSTEMS; GREEN-IT; GRID OPERATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; NEW SERVICES; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SEASONAL FLUCTUATIONS; SMART GRID; SMART METERING TECHNOLOGY; SMART METERS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LEAD ACID BATTERIES;

SMART POWER GRIDS;

EID: 84870642506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R. and Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. Mis Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 227-247.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999). Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 361-391.
3. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Baron, R. and Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1173-1182.
5. Beier, G. (2004). Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik: Ein Persönlichkeitsmerkmal mit Relevanz für die Gestaltung technischer Systeme. Berlin: Dissertation.
6. Beier, G., Spiekermann, S. and Rothensee, M. (2006). Die Akzeptanz zukünftiger Ubiquitous Computing Anwendungen. In: Mensch & Computer 2006: Mensch und Computer im Strukturwandel. Heineke, A. and Paul, H. (eds.). Munich: Oldenbourg, pp. 145-154.
7. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 201-214.
8. Chin, W. and Todd, P. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 237-246.
9. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340.
10. Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 475- 487.
11. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
12. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 14, pp. 1111-1132.
13. Devaraj, S., Fan, M. and Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics. Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 316-333.
14. Dirks, K. (2000). Trust in Leadership and Team Performance: Evidence From NCAA Basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, No. 6, pp. 1004-1012.
15. Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A. and Xiaodong, D. (1998). Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Easeof- use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis. Decision Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 839-869.
16. DRSG (2009). Demand Responses and Smart Grid Coalition - Definitions. URL: http://www.drsgcoalition.org/resources/definitions.htm.
17. Fazio, R. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In: The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior. Sorrentino, R. and Higgins, E. (eds.). New York: Guilford, pp. 204- 243.
18. Featherman, M. and Pavlou, P. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 451-474.
19. FMET (2006). Potenziale der Informations- und Kommunikations-Technologien zur Optimierung der Energieversorgungund des Energieverbrauchs (eEnergy).
20. Hendrickson, A., Massey, P. and Cronan, T. (1993). On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 227-230.
21. Hong, S. and Tam, K. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information systems research, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 162.
22. Hu, P., Chau, P., Liu Sheng, O. and Kar Yan, T. (1999). Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 91-112.
23. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. and Davis, G. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 114.
24. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. and Chervany, N. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183-213.
25. Karahanna, E. L., M. (2000). E-Mail and V-Mail Usage: Generalizing Across Technologies. Journal of Organizational Computering & Electronic Commerce, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 49-66.
26. Kim, Y. J., Chun, J. U. and Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 29, No., pp. 67-77.
27. Kirkman, B., Chen, G., Farh, J., Chen, Z. and Lowe, K. (2009). Individual Power Distance Orientation and Follower Reactions to Transformational Leaders: A Cross-Level, Cross-Cultural Examination. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 744-764.
28. Kueck, H. (2009). Information and Communication Technology in Energy Supply and Consumption. In: E-Energy: Wandel und Chance durch das Internet der Energie. Picot, A. and Neumann, K. (eds.). Berlin: Springer, pp. 95-109.
29. Lai, J., Ong, C., Yang, C. and Tang, W. (2005). Factors Influencing Employees' Usage Behavior of KMS in e-business, PACIS 2005 Proceedings.
30. Lederer, A., Maupin, D., Sena, M. and Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 269-282.
31. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. and Larsen, K. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of AIS, Vol. 2003, No. 12, pp. 752-780.
32. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 191- 204.
33. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 173-191.
34. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M. (1996). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
35. Phang, C., Li, Y., Sutanto, J. and Kankanhalli, A. (2005). Senior Citizens' Adoption of E-Government: In Quest of the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness. Proceedings of the 38th HICSS 2005.
36. Plouffe, C., Hulland, J. and Vandenbosch, M. (2001). Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions- understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information systems research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 208.
37. Riemenschneider, C. and Hardgrave, B. (2001). Explaining software development tool use with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 1-8.
38. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
39. Schiffman, L. and Kanuk, L. (2004). Consumer Behavior. 8th. edn., Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
40. Segars, A. and Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 517-525.
41. Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, Vol. 13, No., pp. 290-312.
42. Straub, D. (1994). The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S. . Information Systems Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 23-47.
43. Straub, D., Keil, M. and Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1-11.
44. Subramanian, G. (1994). A Replication of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Measurement. Decision Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 863-874.
45. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-176.
46. Thompson, R. H., J. (1996). Inside the black box of alpha, beta, and gamma change: Using a cognitive-processing model to assess attitude structure. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 655-690.
47. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 239-260.
48. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 342-365.
49. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.
50. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 451-481.
51. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. and Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478.
52. Vijayasarathy, L. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information and Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 747- 762.
53. Wang, C., Lo, S. and Fang, W. (2008). Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile telecommunication innovation: The existence of network externalities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 101-110.
54. Wissner, M. (2009). IKT, Wachstum und Produktivität in der Energiewirtschaft - Auf dem Weg zum Smart Grid. WIK Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 320. URL: www.wik.org/content/diskus/diskus-320.pdf.
55. Yang, H. and Yoo, Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: Revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 19-31.