Impacts of implementing enterprise content management systems

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Grahlmann, Knut R ^a   Hilhorst, Cokky ^b   Van Amerongen, Sander ^c   Helms, Remko ^a   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Beijing PricewaterhouseCoopers Management Consulting   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Enterprise content management systems; IS evaluation; IS impact; IS success failure

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; IS EVALUATION; IS IMPACTS; IS SUCCESS; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENTS;

INDUSTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

QUEUEING NETWORKS;

EID: 84870631886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Aalst, W.M.P. van der. (2004). Business Process Management Demystified: A Tutorial on Models, Systems and Standards for Workflow Management. In J. Desel, W. Reisig, & G. Rozenberg (Eds.), Lectures on Concurrency and Petri Nets (Vol. 3098/2004, pp. 1-65). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
3. Andersen, R. (2008). The Rhetoric of Enterprise Content Management (ECM): Confronting the Assumptions Driving ECM Adoption and Transforming Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 61-87.
4. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-386.
5. Bentley, K., & Yoong, P. (2000). Knowledge work and telework: an exploratory study. Internet Research, 10(4), 346 - 356.
6. Bouwman, H., Hooff, B. van den, Wijngaert, L. van de, & Dijk, J. van. (2005). Information and Communication Technology in Organizations : Adoption, Implementation, Use and Effects. London, UK: SAGE.
7. Bridges, J.D. (2007). Taking ECM From Concept to Reality. The Information Management Journal, 41(6), 30-39.
8. Cooper, R.B., & Zmud, R.W. (1990). Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123-139.
9. Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 207-224.
10. Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273-289.
11. Dourish, P., Edwards, W.K., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K., Salisbury, M., et al. (2000). Extending Document Management Systems with User-Specific Active Properties. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(2), 140-170.
12. Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices, Trends, and Recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597-636.
13. Engel, E., Hayes, R.M., & Wang, X. (2007). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and firms' going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 116-145.
14. Gilliland-Swetland, A. (2005). Electronic Records Management. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 39, pp. 219-253).
15. Grahlmann, K.R., Helms, R., Brinkkemper, S., Hilhorst, C. & Amerongen, S. van (submitted for publication). Towards a Reference Architecture for Enterprise Content Management.
16. Grahlmann, K.R., Hilhorst, C., Amerongen, S. van, Helms, R. & Brinkkemper, S. (2009). Categorizing impacts of implementing Enterprise Content Management Systems. Technical report from Utrecht University, Dept. of Information and Computing Sciences.
17. Grudin, J. (2006). Enterprise Knowledge Management and Emerging Technologies. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, HI, USA, January 4-7.
18. Hong, K., & Kim, Y. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 25-40.
19. Irani, Z. (2002). Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain. Information & Management, 40(1), 11-24.
20. Karimi, J., Somers, T.M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The Impact of ERP Implementation on Business Process Outcomes: A Factor-Based Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 101-134.
21. Mabert, V. A., Soni, A., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2003). The impact of organization size on enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations in the US manufacturing sector. Omega, 31(3), 235-246.
22. Mani, D., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. (2007). Conflict Resolution or Informational Response? An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Governance Choice in Business Process Outsourcing Relationships. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems. Montreal, Canada, December 9 - 12.
23. McKeever, S. (2003). Understanding Web content management systems: evolution, lifecycle and market. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(9), 686 - 692.
24. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2008). impact. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impact%5B2%5D.
25. Nordheim, S., & Päivärinta, T. (2006). Implementing enterprise content management: from evolution through strategy to contradictions out-of-the-box. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 648-662.
26. O'Leary, D.E. (1997). The Internet, Intranets, and the AI Renaissance. Computer, 30(1), 71-78.
27. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
28. Päivärinta, T., & Munkvold, B.E. (2005). Enterprise Content Management: An Integrated Perspective on Information Management. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA, January 3-6.
29. Pentland, B.T. (2003). Conceptualizing and Measuring Variety in the Execution of Organizational Work Processes. Management Science, 49(7), 857-870.
30. Shang, S., & Seddon, P.B. (2002). Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective. Information Systems Journal, 12(4), 271-299.
31. Smith, H. A. & McKeen, J.D. (2003). Developments in Practice VIII: Enterprise Content Management. In Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11(33), 647-659.
32. Smithson, S., & Hirschheim, R. (1998). Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(3), 158-174.
33. Sprague, R.H. (1995). Electronic Document Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Information Systems Managers. MIS Quarterly, 19(1), 29-49.
34. Suchan, J., & Hayzak, G. (2001). The Communication Characteristics of Virtual Teams: A Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(3), 174-186.
35. Trippe, B. (2005). Component Content Management in Practice - Meeting the Demands of the Most Complex Content Applications. Retrieved December 16, 2008, from http://www.single-sourceforum.de/rueckblicke/2005/folien/ssf05-folien- kuppers.pdf.
36. Tyrväinen, P., Päivärinta, T., Salminen, A., & Iivari, J. (2006). Characterizing the evolving research on enterprise content management. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 627-634.
37. Vom Brocke J., Simons A., & Cleven A. (2008). A Business Process Perspective on Enterprise Content Management: Towards a Framework for Organisational Change. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, Ireland, June 9 - 11.
38. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research : Design and Methods. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.